Things You Thought Today - BlueHeronDruid - May 26, 2018 - 8:20pm
Trump - kcar - May 26, 2018 - 7:50pm
Crazy conspiracy theories - ScottFromWyoming - May 26, 2018 - 7:48pm
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - May 26, 2018 - 7:41pm
Baseball, anyone? - spammer - May 26, 2018 - 7:19pm
More reggae, less Marley please - R_P - May 26, 2018 - 6:46pm
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - May 26, 2018 - 6:03pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - dxnerd86 - May 26, 2018 - 5:57pm
What are you doing RIGHT NOW? - SeriousLee - May 26, 2018 - 5:33pm
Name My Band - Antigone - May 26, 2018 - 5:17pm
Geldof, Hutchins mess? - jambo - May 26, 2018 - 3:37pm
Error: Could not retrieve offline list - Steve - May 26, 2018 - 3:25pm
What makes you smile? - Antigone - May 26, 2018 - 1:57pm
Favorite Quotes - oldviolin - May 26, 2018 - 1:39pm
Freedom of speech? - R_P - May 26, 2018 - 12:56pm
What Makes You Laugh? - Steely_D - May 26, 2018 - 12:38pm
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - May 26, 2018 - 8:18am
That's a terrible idea. Let's do it! - Alexandra - May 26, 2018 - 7:53am
YouTube: Music-Videos - SeriousLee - May 26, 2018 - 7:38am
Today in History - Red_Dragon - May 26, 2018 - 7:27am
Election 2018 - Red_Dragon - May 26, 2018 - 7:15am
The war on funk is over! - rhahl - May 26, 2018 - 6:43am
What are you listening to now? - SeriousLee - May 26, 2018 - 6:39am
TV shows you watch - R_P - May 26, 2018 - 12:54am
Those lovable acronym guys & gals - ScottFromWyoming - May 25, 2018 - 9:10pm
Free Mp3s - R_P - May 25, 2018 - 5:38pm
Gotta Get Your Drink On - Antigone - May 25, 2018 - 3:21pm
World Music - rhahl - May 25, 2018 - 2:43pm
Things You Thought You Heard Out Loud - Proclivities - May 25, 2018 - 1:57pm
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - oldviolin - May 25, 2018 - 1:23pm
Coffee - Proclivities - May 25, 2018 - 1:11pm
Guns - R_P - May 25, 2018 - 12:54pm
Mixtape Culture Club - Lazy8 - May 25, 2018 - 12:42pm
Way Cool Video - SeriousLee - May 25, 2018 - 12:22pm
Bad Poetry - oldviolin - May 25, 2018 - 12:13pm
how do you feel right now? - SeriousLee - May 25, 2018 - 11:44am
What Did You Do Today? - SeriousLee - May 25, 2018 - 11:09am
deleting/editing comments function gone - sirdroseph - May 25, 2018 - 10:51am
Radio Paradise Comments - Chwkbud - May 25, 2018 - 10:48am
North Korea - cc_rider - May 25, 2018 - 9:17am
Nature's Creatures - Proclivities - May 25, 2018 - 9:14am
Memorial Day - cc_rider - May 25, 2018 - 8:14am
songs that ROCK! - sirdroseph - May 25, 2018 - 2:23am
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - haresfur - May 24, 2018 - 10:17pm
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - AliGator - May 24, 2018 - 9:06pm
Race in America - R_P - May 24, 2018 - 6:33pm
Live Music - kurtster - May 24, 2018 - 6:30pm
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - May 24, 2018 - 4:13pm
Things that piss me off - Antigone - May 24, 2018 - 2:59pm
New Music - ptooey - May 24, 2018 - 2:02pm
Art Show - oldviolin - May 24, 2018 - 1:16pm
Animal Resistance - Proclivities - May 24, 2018 - 1:10pm
Military Matters - R_P - May 24, 2018 - 1:03pm
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - sirdroseph - May 24, 2018 - 11:37am
Afghanistan - R_P - May 24, 2018 - 10:28am
Photos you haven't taken of yourself - Antigone - May 24, 2018 - 10:19am
Books read recently - islander - May 24, 2018 - 9:48am
illegal immigrants - meower - May 24, 2018 - 7:16am
The Truth Unfolds - Red_Dragon - May 23, 2018 - 6:15pm
Breaking News - R_P - May 23, 2018 - 10:49am
Celebrity Deaths - GeneP59 - May 23, 2018 - 9:16am
Celebrity Face Recognition - Proclivities - May 23, 2018 - 6:56am
Environmental, Brilliance or Stupidity - miamizsun - May 23, 2018 - 5:04am
Latin Music - R_P - May 23, 2018 - 12:24am
The Obituary Page - ScottN - May 22, 2018 - 8:54pm
BACK TO THE 80's - R_P - May 22, 2018 - 7:16pm
How To Be Politically Correct, A Primer - R_P - May 22, 2018 - 4:09pm
oh boy CAKE! - haresfur - May 22, 2018 - 2:49pm
what about those emo kids? - Proclivities - May 22, 2018 - 11:27am
When are you too old to drive? - meower - May 22, 2018 - 10:27am
Back to the 00's - rhahl - May 22, 2018 - 10:21am
XPRIZE & Singularity University - miamizsun - May 22, 2018 - 4:12am
Milk squirting in Turkey??? - miamizsun - May 22, 2018 - 4:06am
Your Current Crush - Alexandra - May 21, 2018 - 11:12pm
Immigration - haresfur - May 21, 2018 - 11:11pm
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Climate Change Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 76, 77, 78  Next
Post to this Topic

pigtail Avatar

Location: Southern California
Gender: Female
Zodiac: Taurus
Chinese Yr: Dragon

Posted: May 17, 2018 - 10:04am

Doesn't he just look like someone that  could give a rat's ass about future generations?
Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar

Posted: May 17, 2018 - 9:57am

Republican lawmaker: Rocks tumbling into ocean causing sea level rise
Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar

Posted: May 14, 2018 - 4:06pm

Climate Crisis Clobbers Trump Denials

(...) According to the aforementioned Grist article, runoff from the Rocky Mountains to the Colorado River is expected to be down by 40% this year, or in other words, an extreme severe continuation of a merciless 19-year drought that’s literally parching large swaths of the Southwest. It is a vicious megadrought that won’t quit!

The Bureau claims the odds have tripled, three-times as likely, that reservoirs fall below critical levels with an another 50% probability that, by 2020, the first official water shortage hits the Colorado River. Watch out below!

The crux of the problem is all about living standards. According to laws governing the Colorado River, Arizona is first in line for big-time cuts, which means water allotments could be cut by 20% or more. Meanwhile, Burman has called for “conservation” measures.” Ahem… well, better late than never.

It’s not like scientists have not advertised this upcoming crisis. An article by Robinson Meyer in The Atlantic (2016) spelled out the danger “A Mega-Drought is Coming to America’s Southwest,” furthermore “Unless carbon emissions plummet soon, the risk of a region-altering disaster in Arizona and New Mexico will exceed 99 percent,” prompting a big important question: How is it possible to cut carbon emissions when America’s stated energy policy gooses up fossil fuel exploration, production, and use? Answer: Not.

A “region-altering” disaster with 99% risk of it happening in Arizona and New Mexico implies a worst-case scenario, which is a breakdown of the ecosystem and consequent life support system. There are no silver linings to be found in that analysis, less bathing, no lawn watering, forget car washes, close swimming pools, and dried out splotchy sandy golf courses, among other inconveniences.

Toby Ault, professor of earth science at Cornell University, one of the authors of the study in The Atlantic, says: “As we add greenhouse gases into the atmosphere – and we haven’t put the brakes on stopping this- we are weighting the dice for mega-drought conditions,” or in plain English 99% certainty it’ll happen. Take that to the craps table for a sure-fire winner.

Ten years ago an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) paper (2008) by Justin Sheffield and Eric F. Wood, “Projected Changes in Drought Occurrence Under Future Global Warming From Multimodel, Multi-Scenario, IPCC AR34 Simulations,” clearly stated that America’s Southwest is one of the most sensitive regions in the world for increased risk of drought caused by global warming.

In fact, scientists have been warning about the relationship of global warming/climate change, aka: climate crisis and droughts for decades, but the United States has not taken bait. The U.S. has never ever, not even a whisper, instituted a nationwide plan to forestall or to beat back a climate crisis that is quickly, very quickly getting out of hand. Is it too late?

According to Commissioner Burman: “We can’t afford to wait for a crisis before we implement drought contingency plans.” But, it’s already a crisis, just ask the city of Las Vegas about water resources, but whisper, don’t shout. LV has ordinances in place to penalize citizens that waste water, which is increasingly precious as it flows from Lake Mead, which hit record lows in recent years, prompting LV to install a “third straw” lower intake to capture the final drops in an absolute worst-case scenario, which increasingly looks like reality. (...)

Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar

Posted: May 9, 2018 - 10:58pm

Global warming will depress economic growth in Trump country
It’s global warming that will hurt the economy in red states, not a carbon tax.

Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar

Posted: May 4, 2018 - 4:20pm

Make America Deny Again...
EPA’s climate change website went down a year ago for ‘updating.’ It’s still not back.

The news came on a Friday evening in late April last year: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency had removed an informational website about climate change, taking down a page that had been up, in some form, for nearly two decades and under three presidents.

Before its removal, the page had plainly stated a position on climate change: It is caused by humans, and there’s no significant doubt about that. But that position contradicted statements by the new EPA chief, Scott Pruitt, who had expressed doubts about human activity being the dominant driver of climate change.

EPA said at the time that the site had been taken down for review and that it had been archived and was still available as part of a “snapshot” of the state of the site on Jan. 19, 2017, just as the new administration took command.

But a year later, the agency’s climate page is still down, and would-be visitors are redirected to a notice saying that “this page is being updated.”

“We are currently updating our website to reflect EPA’s priorities under the leadership of President Trump and Administrator Pruitt,” it reads. (The archived snapshot remains in place.)

The removal of EPA’s main page on climate change (though it also has a number of others that remain online), an extensive informational resource, is significant because it underscores the ambivalence about climate change science within the Trump administration. From Trump to Pruitt, there are many who have called into question the scientific consensus on climate change. (...)

Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar

Posted: May 3, 2018 - 2:12pm

Earth’s atmosphere just crossed another troubling climate change threshold
A recent CO2 measurements at Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii. (Scripps Institution of Oceanography)

For the first time since humans have been monitoring, atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide have exceeded 410 parts per million averaged across an entire month, a threshold that pushes the planet ever closer to warming beyond levels that scientists and the international community have deemed “safe.”

The reading from the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii finds that concentrations of the climate-warming gas averaged above 410 parts per million throughout April. The first time readings crossed 410 at all occurred on April 18, 2017, or just about a year ago.

Carbon dioxide concentrations — whose “greenhouse gas effect” traps heat and drives climate change — were around 280 parts per million circa 1880, at the dawn of the industrial revolution. They’re now 46 percent higher.

As you can see in the famed “saw-toothed curve” graph above, more formally known as the Keeling Curve, concentrations have ticked upward in an unbroken progression for many decades. But they also go up and down on an annual cycle that’s controlled by the patterns and seasonality of plant growth around the planet.

The rate of growth is about 2.5 parts per million per year, said Ralph Keeling, who directs the CO2 program at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, which monitors the readings. The rate has been increasing, with the decade of the 2010s rising faster than the 2000s.

“It’s another milestone in the upward increase in CO2 over time,” Keeling said of the newest measurements. “It puts us closer to some targets we don’t really want to get to, like getting over 450 or 500 ppm. That’s pretty much dangerous territory.”

“As a scientist, what concerns me the most is not that we have passed yet another round-number threshold but what this continued rise actually means: that we are continuing full speed ahead with an unprecedented experiment with our planet, the only home we have,” Katharine Hayhoe, a climate scientist at Texas Tech University, said in a statement on the milestone.

Planetary carbon dioxide levels have been this high or even higher in the planet’s history — but it has been a long time. And scientists are concerned that the rate of change now is far faster than what Earth has previously been used to.

In the mid-Pliocene warm period more than 3 million years ago, they were also around 400 parts per million — but Earth’s sea level is known to have been 66 feet or more higher, and the planet was still warmer than now.

As a recent federal climate science report (co-authored by Hahyoe) noted, the 400 parts per million carbon dioxide level in the Pliocene “was sustained over long periods of time, whereas today the global CO2 concentration is increasing rapidly.” In other words, Earth’s movement toward Pliocene-like conditions may play out in the decades and centuries ahead of us.

Even farther back, in the Miocene era between 14 million and 23 million years ago, carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere are believed to have reached 500 parts per million. Antarctica lost tens of meters of ice then, probably corresponding to a sea level rise once again on the scale of that seen in the Pliocene.

Farther back still, at the Eocene-Oligocene boundary around 34 million years ago, Antarctica is believed to have had no ice at all, with atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations of 750 parts per million.

These data points help show why it is that scientists believe that planetary temperatures, sea levels and carbon dioxide levels all tend to rise and fall together — and thus, why Earth is now headed back toward a period like the mid-Pliocene or even, perhaps, the Miocene, if current trends continue.

Keeling said that the planet, currently at 1 degree Celsius (1.8 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels, is probably not yet committed to a warming of 1.5 or 2 degrees Celsius, but it’s getting closer all the time — particularly for 1.5 C. “We don’t have a lot of headroom,” he said.

“It’s not going to be a sudden breakthrough, either,” Keeling continued. “We’re just moving further and further into dangerous territory.”

Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar

Posted: May 1, 2018 - 10:31pm

Pruitt's EPA Is on the Verge of 'Regulatory Capture', Study Says
When EPA decisions are based on industry priorities instead of public interest, it's regulatory capture. Researchers say industry has more sway now than with Reagan.
Under the Trump administration, the Environmental Protection Agency has veered so far from its foundational mission of protecting human health and the environment that it faces the highest risk in its 47-year history of being reshaped to serve industry rather than the American public, according to a new study in the American Journal of Public Health.

The EPA routinely faces criticism from environmental and public health advocates for allegedly quashing science and softening rules to help industry. During the early years of the Reagan presidency in particular, EPA Administrator Anne Gorsuch worked to scale back the agency's activities.

But the new study, based on interviews with current and former EPA staff and reviews of White House and EPA initiatives, concluded that the agency is now on the edge of "regulatory capture," when industry priorities determine policy rather than the public interest and impartial research.

"New EPA leadership has thus far aimed at deconstructing, rather than reconstructing, the agency by comprehensively undermining many of the agency's rules, programs, and policies while also severely undercutting its budget, work capacity, internal operations and morale," concluded the study, titled "The Environmental Protection Agency in the Early Trump Administration: Prelude to Regulatory Capture."

The study, part of the American Journal of Public Health's special issue on climate change, adds to the mounting scrutiny and criticism of EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt's policy, personnel and operational decisions, which sometimes weave together.

For instance, the study suggests that the undermining of the EPA's public health mission is enabled in part by Pruitt and his aides making policy decisions with little input from longtime staff and scientists.

Such isolation is cemented by "the extraordinary lengths that Pruitt has to preserve secrecy and autonomy from the EPA career staff, such as cordoning his office wing off from career employees, reportedly forbidding note taking at some meetings and employing 24-hour armed guards," the report said. The study was accepted by the peer-reviewed journal in February of this year, before some of the recent scandals around Pruitt had surfaced, including his condo rental from the wife of a lobbyist. He currently faces at least 10 investigations from his EPA tenure. (...)


miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male

Posted: Apr 26, 2018 - 4:05pm

 R_P wrote:
 miamizsun wrote:
his senior role at libertarian think tank Cato Institute demanded it

i don't know if those are jerry's words, but i appreciate his attempt at his own "libertarian" shop

this guy is trying to build a bridge between the two wings for economic climate action

it might surprise people to know that there are many politicians in the gop (according to taylor) that are in favor of action on co2

according to jerry, mccain's climate plan (as the nominee) for co2 was aggressive

i don't read everything they put out but it seems that they're trying to get out in front of this transition by proposing something reasonable and market based

versus leaving it up to politicians clueless about economics

Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar

Posted: Apr 26, 2018 - 3:30pm

 miamizsun wrote:
his senior role at libertarian think tank Cato Institute demanded it


miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male

Posted: Apr 26, 2018 - 3:21pm

i read niskanen site daily (or most days)

Jerry Taylor, the founder of the Niskanen Center, spent years of his career as a professional climate denier - his senior role at libertarian think tank Cato Institute demanded it, and he was unconvinced that the risks of taking action outweighed the destruction that action might have on the world’s economy.

But starting about seven or so years ago, Taylor began to question his own assumptions, and after studying the science - and in particular the academic economics-  more carefully, he had a complete change of heart. Taylor is now an advocate for addressing climate change, and in this talk at the NewCo Shift Forum earlier this year, he explains why.

Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar

Posted: Apr 19, 2018 - 7:08pm

Senate Confirms Climate Change Denier To Lead NASA 

Since 2016, Half of All Coral in the Great Barrier Reef Has Died
A new study warns it has become a “highly altered, degraded system.”
Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar

Posted: Apr 11, 2018 - 2:21pm

Gulf Stream current at its weakest in 1,600 years, studies show

The warm Atlantic current linked to severe and abrupt changes in the climate in the past is now at its weakest in at least 1,600 years, new research shows. The findings, based on multiple lines of scientific evidence, throw into question previous predictions that a catastrophic collapse of the Gulf Stream would take centuries to occur.

Such a collapse would see western Europe suffer far more extreme winters, sea levels rise fast on the eastern seaboard of the US and would disrupt vital tropical rains. The new research shows the current is now 15% weaker than around 400AD, an exceptionally large deviation, and that human-caused global warming is responsible for at least a significant part of the weakening. (...)

Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar

Posted: Apr 8, 2018 - 12:43pm

Wipeout: Human role in climate change removed from science report
National Park Service officials have deleted every mention of humans’ role in causing climate change in drafts of a long-awaited report on sea level rise and storm surge, contradicting Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke’s vow to Congress that his department is not censoring science.

Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar

Posted: Mar 28, 2018 - 8:48pm

This ancient climate catastrophe is our best clue about Earth’s future

I get around
haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male

Posted: Mar 3, 2018 - 5:48pm

 R_P wrote: 
Restore their power after the grid in Puerto Rico is fixed. First come first served.
Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar

Posted: Mar 3, 2018 - 5:18pm

More than 2 million without power as powerful storm moves offshore
People along the Northeast coast braced for more flooding during high tides Saturday even as the powerful storm that inundated roads, snapped trees and knocked out power to more than 2 million homes and businesses moved hundreds of miles out to sea.

Areas from Maryland to Maine remained under flood warnings. Officials in eastern Massachusetts, where dozens of people were rescued from high waters overnight, warned of another round of flooding during high tides expected around noon.

As Saturday's midday high tide arrived, heavy surf crashed into the cliffs along Cape Cod Bay in Bourne, Massachusetts, drawing dozens of onlookers to watch churning brown waves take big bites out of the eroding coastline.

"We've been here a long time and we've never seen it as bad as this," said Alex Barmashi, who lives in the hard-hit village of Sagamore Beach.

Up the coast in Scituate, Massachusetts, Becky Smith watched as ocean waters started to fill up a nearby marina's parking lot from her vantage point at the Barker Tavern, a restaurant overlooking the harbor.

"It looks like a war zone," she said, describing the scene in the coastal town near Boston where powerful waves dumped sand and rubble on roads and winds uprooted massive trees. "It's a lot of debris, big rocks and pieces of wood littering the streets."

Residents in other coastal areas, meanwhile, bailed out basements and surveyed the damage while waiting for power to be restored, a process that power companies warned could take days in parts. More than 2 million homes and businesses remained without power Saturday. (...)

Sink or Swim
sdwright Avatar

Location: underwater
Gender: Female
Zodiac: Taurus
Chinese Yr: Snake

Posted: Mar 2, 2018 - 12:39pm

 R_P wrote:

NICE ONE{#Exclaim}  Is the Prez buried under these poles and wires that I just can't see?
Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar

Posted: Mar 2, 2018 - 12:34pm

Oînk, oînk, OÎNK!
R_P Avatar

Posted: Mar 2, 2018 - 11:59am

Once-in-a-generation flooding possible in Boston — for the second time this year

(...) If it seems like you’re hearing the term “record flooding” more and more in recent years, that’s because you are.

Since 2000, the seas have risen several inches in the Northeast due to climate change. Though it may sound small, that’s oftentimes enough to tip the scales into “record” category. The same storm 50 years ago would be less severe than it is today, simply because the water wasn’t as high back then. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change estimates that coastal flooding threats could triple toward the end of the century.

Sink or Swim
sdwright Avatar

Location: underwater
Gender: Female
Zodiac: Taurus
Chinese Yr: Snake

Posted: Mar 1, 2018 - 6:44pm

Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 76, 77, 78  Next