Sleepless in.... - SeriousLee - Jan 21, 2018 - 10:13am
 
What are you listening to now? - SeriousLee - Jan 21, 2018 - 10:04am
 
Counting with Pictures - SeriousLee - Jan 21, 2018 - 9:43am
 
Poll: Do You Sleep to RP? - SeriousLee - Jan 21, 2018 - 9:35am
 
Trump - Red_Dragon - Jan 21, 2018 - 9:34am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - oppositelock - Jan 21, 2018 - 9:29am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - islander - Jan 21, 2018 - 9:01am
 
What Are You Going To Do Today? - islander - Jan 21, 2018 - 9:00am
 
Name My Band - Coaxial - Jan 21, 2018 - 8:25am
 
The Saddest Songs - maryte - Jan 21, 2018 - 8:17am
 
Things that make you go Hmmmm..... - Red_Dragon - Jan 21, 2018 - 8:12am
 
What Did You Do Today? - miamizsun - Jan 21, 2018 - 8:03am
 
Coffee - miamizsun - Jan 21, 2018 - 7:23am
 
what else do you listen to? (RP alternatives) - miamizsun - Jan 21, 2018 - 7:21am
 
What Makes You Sad? - kurtster - Jan 21, 2018 - 6:30am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos; Please Limit to 510 ... - SeriousLee - Jan 21, 2018 - 6:01am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - Alexandra - Jan 20, 2018 - 8:14pm
 
Celebrity Face Recognition - Antigone - Jan 20, 2018 - 6:27pm
 
FLAC stream - jbuhl - Jan 20, 2018 - 6:25pm
 
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - SeriousLee - Jan 20, 2018 - 11:38am
 
Geeky Jokes - SeriousLee - Jan 20, 2018 - 5:55am
 
Quotations - Antigone - Jan 20, 2018 - 5:22am
 
NETFLIX - Alexandra - Jan 20, 2018 - 12:45am
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - SeriousLee - Jan 19, 2018 - 3:42pm
 
Radio Paradise Flac in Volumio - wtrepode - Jan 19, 2018 - 1:58pm
 
What makes you smile? - Antigone - Jan 19, 2018 - 12:46pm
 
Oops! - Proclivities - Jan 19, 2018 - 12:32pm
 
Animal Resistance - pigtail - Jan 19, 2018 - 10:18am
 
OUR CATS!! - pigtail - Jan 19, 2018 - 9:45am
 
Oh, The Stupidity - Red_Dragon - Jan 19, 2018 - 8:45am
 
I SCREAM FOR ICE CREAM ! - ScottFromWyoming - Jan 19, 2018 - 7:22am
 
The Image Post - SeriousLee - Jan 19, 2018 - 6:01am
 
Outstanding Covers - JrzyTmata - Jan 19, 2018 - 5:58am
 
Canzoniere Grecanico Salentino & other musica italiana - GiorgioLIC - Jan 18, 2018 - 11:10pm
 
Things You Thought Today - islander - Jan 18, 2018 - 9:06pm
 
The Wilderness Downtown. - miamizsun - Jan 18, 2018 - 2:55pm
 
Freedom of speech? - miamizsun - Jan 18, 2018 - 12:08pm
 
Maps • Google • GeoGuessr - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jan 18, 2018 - 11:55am
 
Amazon Products (May Contain Spam) - miamizsun - Jan 18, 2018 - 11:55am
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - pigtail - Jan 18, 2018 - 11:33am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - sirdroseph - Jan 18, 2018 - 8:08am
 
End of the Journals ? - Mugro - Jan 18, 2018 - 8:04am
 
HEOS by Denon vs ... - Alchemist - Jan 17, 2018 - 11:23pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - BlueHeronDruid - Jan 17, 2018 - 6:38pm
 
Best Song Comments. - haresfur - Jan 17, 2018 - 2:52pm
 
Poetry Forum - Antigone - Jan 17, 2018 - 2:44pm
 
Breaking News - Proclivities - Jan 17, 2018 - 9:35am
 
Baseball, anyone? - Red_Dragon - Jan 17, 2018 - 6:27am
 
Irony 101 - miamizsun - Jan 17, 2018 - 4:37am
 
Sick And Satired - miamizsun - Jan 17, 2018 - 4:21am
 
Reccomended System or Powered Speakers - miamizsun - Jan 17, 2018 - 4:11am
 
Little known information...maybe even facts - spammer - Jan 16, 2018 - 9:52pm
 
Crimes and Misdemeanors (not bad ones, mostly amusing) - ScottFromWyoming - Jan 16, 2018 - 8:05pm
 
Cool Photo - Proclivities - Jan 16, 2018 - 1:57pm
 
Great guitar faces - Proclivities - Jan 16, 2018 - 1:27pm
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - kcar - Jan 16, 2018 - 11:08am
 
Capitalism and Consumerism... now what? - Red_Dragon - Jan 16, 2018 - 10:14am
 
Mobile App - Proclivities - Jan 16, 2018 - 9:31am
 
Radio Paradise on the Amazon Echo - BillG - Jan 16, 2018 - 8:50am
 
A Proposal For Haiti - cc_rider - Jan 16, 2018 - 8:38am
 
Sixth Sense and a Thankyou! - oldviolin - Jan 16, 2018 - 8:08am
 
Immigration - Red_Dragon - Jan 16, 2018 - 7:25am
 
The Obituary Page - miamizsun - Jan 16, 2018 - 6:25am
 
Nuclear power - saviour or scourge? - miamizsun - Jan 16, 2018 - 4:44am
 
XPRIZE & Singularity University - miamizsun - Jan 16, 2018 - 4:23am
 
You might be getting old if...... - Coaxial - Jan 15, 2018 - 7:23pm
 
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes. - Antigone - Jan 15, 2018 - 1:28pm
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - ScottFromWyoming - Jan 15, 2018 - 11:53am
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - Jan 15, 2018 - 11:05am
 
Great Old Songs You Rarely Hear Anymore - pigtail - Jan 15, 2018 - 9:41am
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - ScottFromWyoming - Jan 15, 2018 - 8:11am
 
Martin Luther King day - miamizsun - Jan 15, 2018 - 6:45am
 
Same origin policy - BillG - Jan 15, 2018 - 4:10am
 
WTF??!! - ScottFromWyoming - Jan 14, 2018 - 6:26pm
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - Coaxial - Jan 14, 2018 - 6:24pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Race in America Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 27, 28, 29  Next
Post to this Topic
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Nov 2, 2017 - 4:20pm

I suppose social media gives a voice to unimaginative racists and sectarian warriors who have always been with us.

I admire her bravery.  Folks who think like that in Canada tend to keep their mouths shut.  (I run into them in private settings ... often.)


Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Nov 2, 2017 - 12:02pm

 aflanigan wrote:
One of the great things about living in the 21st century melting pot that is the USA is that being an overt racist P.O.S. can sometimes have significant consequences.
America’s Far-Right Sweetheart Laura Loomer Wants To Sue Uber And Lyft For NOT Being Bigots


 
What an asshat.
aflanigan
Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity
aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Aquarius
Chinese Yr: Rat


Posted: Nov 2, 2017 - 11:49am

One of the great things about living in the 21st century melting pot that is the USA is that being an overt racist P.O.S. can sometimes have significant consequences.
America’s Far-Right Sweetheart Laura Loomer Wants To Sue Uber And Lyft For NOT Being Bigots

kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Libra
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Oct 30, 2017 - 6:22am

WHY ARE ALL THE CONSERVATIVE LOUDMOUTHS IRISH-AMERICAN?

Why has the ascent of a bunch of people who in an earlier period might have been called Micks drawn no notice at all?
...
By the 1960s, however, Catholics, especially Irish Catholics, had finally made it and become fully “white,” a long process indeed. Having fought their way to full inclusion, many were intent on pulling up the drawbridge.

To get at the special role of Irishmen, we need to examine “how the Irish became white,” as in the title of Noel Ignatiev’s 1995 book ...

... Jump forward to the present. Outside of the impoverished anomaly of Whitey Bulger’s Boston and some points north (think Dennis Lehane, The Fighter , Manchester By the Sea ), Irish America has lost virtually all its distinctive qualities, becoming just one more version of whiteness colored by ethnicity.



sirdroseph
Endeavor to Perservere
sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Sagittarius
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Oct 12, 2017 - 9:49am

 oldviolin wrote:

A ha! A racist purest! I knew it! Well, in the vernacular let me leave you wit dis...I loves me some black peoples...

 




lol! Aren't the society police ridiculous?
oldviolin
ab origine
oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Leo


Posted: Oct 12, 2017 - 8:13am

 sirdroseph wrote:
 oldviolin wrote:

Well, IMHO they kind of do not have any, an opinion shared by many of my liberated African American friends who, ironically, fear the reprecussion feedback they would expect to voice said honest opinion...

 


That's racist, you are not supposed to tell anyone you have Arican American friends or you will be deemed racist. ;-)

 
A ha! A racist purest! I knew it! Well, in the vernacular let me leave you wit dis...I loves me some black peoples...
sirdroseph
Endeavor to Perservere
sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Sagittarius
Chinese Yr: Dragon


Posted: Oct 12, 2017 - 8:09am

 oldviolin wrote:

Well, IMHO they kind of do not have any, an opinion shared by many of my liberated African American friends who, ironically, fear the reprecussion feedback they would expect to voice said honest opinion...

 




That's racist, you are not supposed to tell anyone you have Arican American friends or you will be deemed racist. ;-)
oldviolin
ab origine
oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Leo


Posted: Oct 12, 2017 - 7:59am

 miamizsun wrote:
i'm losing it

i thought i just heard that black lives matter was protesting the aclu on free speech

what?

and that they said liberalism is white supremacy?

how in the hell do they get that?

chances are if you're reading this you're a white supremacist?

this is not good


how are these folks supposed to have any credibility?

 
Well, IMHO they kind of do not have any, an opinion shared by many of my liberated African American friends who, ironically, fear the repercussion feedback they would expect to voice said honest opinion...


miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 9, 2017 - 10:08am

i'm losing it

i thought i just heard that black lives matter was protesting the aclu on free speech

what?

and that they said liberalism is white supremacy?

how in the hell do they get that?

chances are if you're reading this you're a white supremacist?

this is not good




how are these folks supposed to have any credibility?


westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Oct 4, 2017 - 1:50pm

 R_P wrote: 
I think it would have been even far worse if he had called the coach a "good nigger".  

Gotta admire the fire chief for providing more proof-of-the-pudding data behind what motivated the protest.  
 
FWIW, good on the NFL players for adopting this form of non-violent political protest.   Well done.  


R_P
Ni dieu ni maître
R_P Avatar



Posted: Sep 26, 2017 - 9:58am

Pennsylvania fire chief calls Steelers coach Mike Tomlin a ‘no-good n*gger’ over NFL protests
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Sep 10, 2017 - 3:50pm

NPR has an interesting podcast on the Southern Poverty Law Centre.
On the Media:  Duck and Cover
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Sep 9, 2017 - 10:05am

Interesting discussion.  I grew up listening to Nazi occupation stories.  My grandfather was a capo terrorist who went on to be a very successful businessman with conservative political leanings.  He was also one of the most civil persons I have ever known.

I quickly figured out that my mother's use of the term 'hate' was very different from my spoiled Canadian class mates who 'hated' this or that.

Maybe the USA should be occupied by a foreign power to regain perspective?
—————————————————————————————-

I looked up Charles Murray and found this on the wiki-page:

Incident at Middlebury College<edit>

On March 2, 2017, Murray was shouted down at Middlebury College (Middlebury, Vermont) by students and others not connected with the school, and prevented from speaking at the original location on campus. The speech was moved to another location and a closed circuit broadcast showed him being interviewed by professor Allison Stanger. After the interview, there was a violent confrontation between protesters and Murray, Vice President for Communications Bill Burger, and Stanger (who was hospitalized with a neck injury and concussion) as they left the McCullough Student Center. Middlebury students claimed that Middlebury Public Safety officers instigated and escalated violence against nonviolent protesters and that administrator Bill Burger assaulted protesters with a car. Middlebury President Laurie L. Patton responded after the event, saying the school would respond to "the clear violations of Middlebury College policy that occurred inside and outside Wilson Hall." The school took disciplinary action against 67 students for their involvement in the incident.


On a purely emotional level, I would have been tempted to shave the heads of these students and then parade them through campus as disgraced Nazis.  


Lazy8
human
Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 2, 2017 - 5:52pm

 aflanigan wrote:
You make a good point. I wonder if they began putting assets for their nest egg in offshore accounts from the beginning, or only began doing so recently?

Are they being injudicious or engaging in hype with the "hate group" label? Which groups that have been so-labeled do you feel don't deserve the label? 

According to the article posted it began no later than 2014, but the nature of offshore accounts makes them harder to track. Unless they come clean there may be no way to know what their offshore books look like.

The biggest problem with the SPLC's criteria for being listed as a hate group is how vague and squishy it is. From their web site:
  • "All hate groups have beliefs or practices that attack or malign an entire class of people, typically for their immutable characteristics." And both "attack" and "malign" seem to be very flexible verbs.
  • "Hate group activities can include criminal acts, marches, rallies, speeches, meetings, leafleting or publishing." Well, golly—hard to think of an activist organization not engaged in marches, rallies, speeches, meetings, leafleting or publishing.
A more conventional definition would be groups that advocate violence. SPLC lists organizations like the Family Research Council, which promotes anti-gay initiatives, but not other organizations (like, say, the Mormon church) that back the same initiatives and take pretty much identical positions, The Family Research Council doesn't have the resources to sue the SPLC for libel, and that may figure in to whom they pick on. FRC formed in 1981 but SPLC didn't list them as a hate group until 2010. Did something change between those two dates? Not at the FRC.

Opposition to gay marriage seems to be enough to label you an anti-gay extremist...depending on who you are. It didn't get Barrack Obama labeled as such (before he changed positions in 2012) or Hillary Clinton (2013). The SPLC has gone on several tirades against the NRA (here's one) labeling them as extremists and anti-Muslim (among other things)...but hasn't quite had the courage to officially list them.

Anti-feminist/conservative political groups like the late Phyllis Schlafly's Eagle Forum get tagged, as do anti-immigration groups. In fact SPLC counts every single Eagle Forum chapter as a separate extremist group to pump the numbers up.

They labeled Charles Murray as a "white nationalist", which is so absurd it would be funny if it hadn't lead to threats to his life and limb.

On balance I'm glad they're around. They are taking on an important role tracking legitimate threats, but by conflating conservative political views with hate they are diluting the impact they could be having.
 
 

aflanigan
Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity
aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Aquarius
Chinese Yr: Rat


Posted: Sep 2, 2017 - 4:19pm

 Lazy8 wrote:

 

The listing of salaries is the least-troubling aspect of the report; they aren't out of line with other (large) nonprofits and they are pitifully small compared to what the same people could command in private or corporate practice.

They are a 501 C(3) entity. They don't pay taxes. Moving vast sums of money to the Cayman Islands makes it easier to avoid oversight on that money, so as a donor that makes me suspicious—I see no legitimate reason for that, and I'll remind you how tight it would wind your knickers if a for-profit entity were behaving like this.

Spending 68% of revenue on programs isn't horrible for a non-profit but not exemplary either. I suspect (given the sums moving offshore) that there is some creative accounting defining the words "revenue" and "programs", but even that isn't the most troubling thing about the SPLC's behavior.

They are squandering their credibility by labeling people with politics they disagree with as "hate groups". That dilutes the term and softens the blows they need to deliver to legitimately dangerous groups. They've done great things in the past, and the need for watchdogs like them has never been greater, but they are pulling their own fangs by crying wolf at every barking dog.
 


 
You make a good point. I wonder if they began putting assets for their nest egg in offshore accounts from the beginning, or only began doing so recently?

Are they being injudicious or engaging in hype with the "hate group" label? Which groups that have been so-labeled do you feel don't deserve the label? 
islander
Thalassophile
islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Scorpio
Chinese Yr: Cock


Posted: Sep 2, 2017 - 2:32pm

 Lazy8 wrote:
 aflanigan wrote:
This strikes me as more of a hit piece than credible journalism.

He's got some tepid scare quotes, but where is the context? He could have easily done some digging on the hundreds/thousands of other 501(c)3 nonprofits in the US, both conservative, progressive, nonpartisan, etc. to buttress his insinuations, i.e. to find out if other such orgs. hold offshore assets, how much their salaries for top employees tend to be, etc.

The inclusion of editorializing comments and criticisms from anti-LGBT organizations it has labeled "Hate groups" (not sure how that's not true) seems to be fairly irrelevant to the issue of whether what they are doing is a) unusual, b) illegal, or c) unethical.

They seem to have been upfront about wanting to have a nest egg stashed away to deal with the vagaries of fundraising, and started decades ago. Not surprising that like many businesses and entities, they want to shelter their assets from taxes if possible. From Wikipedia:

"The SPLC's activities, including litigation, are supported by fundraising efforts, and it does not accept any fees or share in legal judgements awarded to clients it represents in court. Starting in 1974, the SPLC set aside money for its endowment stating that it was "convinced that the day come when non-profit groups no longer be able to rely on support through mail because of posting and printing costs". For 2016, its endowment was approximately $319 million per its annual report and SPLC spent 68% of its revenue on programs."

The listing of salaries is the least-troubling aspect of the report; they aren't out of line with other (large) nonprofits and they are pitifully small compared to what the same people could command in private or corporate practice.

They are a 501 C(3) entity. They don't pay taxes. Moving vast sums of money to the Cayman Islands makes it easier to avoid oversight on that money, so as a donor that makes me suspicious—I see no legitimate reason for that, and I'll remind you how tight it would wind your knickers if a for-profit entity were behaving like this.

Spending 68% of revenue on programs isn't horrible for a non-profit but not exemplary either. I suspect (given the sums moving offshore) that there is some creative accounting defining the words "revenue" and "programs", but even that isn't the most troubling thing about the SPLC's behavior.

They are squandering their credibility by labeling people with politics they disagree with as "hate groups". That dilutes the term and softens the blows they need to deliver to legitimately dangerous groups. They've done great things in the past, and the need for watchdogs like them has never been greater, but they are pulling their own fangs by crying wolf at every barking dog.
 


 
I'm very disappointed in them taking this action.  I wasn't bothered by the salaries or the percentage spent on programs (although the percentage could have been higher). In general it just looks bad, and especially in this circumstance it is important to not raise questions unnecessarily.  I hope the attention gets them to step back and rethink it and be more aware of the perceptions of their actions. I'll be holding back further donations until then. Plenty of other places doing solid work in this realm that also need support. 
Lazy8
human
Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 1, 2017 - 8:31am

 aflanigan wrote:
This strikes me as more of a hit piece than credible journalism.

He's got some tepid scare quotes, but where is the context? He could have easily done some digging on the hundreds/thousands of other 501(c)3 nonprofits in the US, both conservative, progressive, nonpartisan, etc. to buttress his insinuations, i.e. to find out if other such orgs. hold offshore assets, how much their salaries for top employees tend to be, etc.

The inclusion of editorializing comments and criticisms from anti-LGBT organizations it has labeled "Hate groups" (not sure how that's not true) seems to be fairly irrelevant to the issue of whether what they are doing is a) unusual, b) illegal, or c) unethical.

They seem to have been upfront about wanting to have a nest egg stashed away to deal with the vagaries of fundraising, and started decades ago. Not surprising that like many businesses and entities, they want to shelter their assets from taxes if possible. From Wikipedia:

"The SPLC's activities, including litigation, are supported by fundraising efforts, and it does not accept any fees or share in legal judgements awarded to clients it represents in court. Starting in 1974, the SPLC set aside money for its endowment stating that it was "convinced that the day come when non-profit groups no longer be able to rely on support through mail because of posting and printing costs". For 2016, its endowment was approximately $319 million per its annual report and SPLC spent 68% of its revenue on programs."

The listing of salaries is the least-troubling aspect of the report; they aren't out of line with other (large) nonprofits and they are pitifully small compared to what the same people could command in private or corporate practice.

They are a 501 C(3) entity. They don't pay taxes. Moving vast sums of money to the Cayman Islands makes it easier to avoid oversight on that money, so as a donor that makes me suspicious—I see no legitimate reason for that, and I'll remind you how tight it would wind your knickers if a for-profit entity were behaving like this.

Spending 68% of revenue on programs isn't horrible for a non-profit but not exemplary either. I suspect (given the sums moving offshore) that there is some creative accounting defining the words "revenue" and "programs", but even that isn't the most troubling thing about the SPLC's behavior.

They are squandering their credibility by labeling people with politics they disagree with as "hate groups". That dilutes the term and softens the blows they need to deliver to legitimately dangerous groups. They've done great things in the past, and the need for watchdogs like them has never been greater, but they are pulling their own fangs by crying wolf at every barking dog.
 

aflanigan
Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity
aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Aquarius
Chinese Yr: Rat


Posted: Sep 1, 2017 - 8:01am

 oldviolin wrote:

A reasonably intelligent person would have to ask themselves if any of this 'hit piece' is true outside of the side show equivocation and resourceful apologetics...It's a bit disturbing and disappointing if not illuminating. Wish I had the time to look further. I always respected this organization for taking on the 'Klan' but it seems like as in everything else, money spoils the day again...
Admittedly I'm not clearly informed if my shallow perception is askew to reality in this case.

 
We probably all want to think the best of both people and organizations we admire, and are ready to think the worst of organizations we don't like. I remember hearing the NPR story on the Red Cross' efforts in Haiti where they spent 500 million with little to show for it. People have brought this up in suggesting that folks not donate to ARC to help Houston victims of Harvey. Established in 1881 by Clara Barton, it has, as someone pointed out, "name recognition to die for". Morris Dees, who founded SPLC, has a similarly heroic stature in the mind of the public. His personal story paints him as a Saint Paul type convert to the fight against racism.

Maybe too much success, growth, and attendant bureaucracy is likely to diminish the virtue and effectiveness of any public service organization over time.


oldviolin
ab origine
oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Leo


Posted: Sep 1, 2017 - 7:21am

 aflanigan wrote:

This strikes me as more of a hit piece than credible journalism.

He's got some tepid scare quotes, but where is the context? He could have easily done some digging on the hundreds/thousands of other 501(c)3 nonprofits in the US, both conservative, progressive, nonpartisan, etc. to buttress his insinuations, i.e. to find out if other such orgs. hold offshore assets, how much their salaries for top employees tend to be, etc.

The inclusion of editorializing comments and criticisms from anti-LGBT organizations it has labeled "Hate groups" (not sure how that's not true) seems to be fairly irrelevant to the issue of whether what they are doing is a) unusual, b) illegal, or c) unethical.

They seem to have been upfront about wanting to have a nest egg stashed away to deal with the vagaries of fundraising, and started decades ago. Not surprising that like many businesses and entities, they want to shelter their assets from taxes if possible. From Wikipedia:

"The SPLC's activities, including litigation, are supported by fundraising efforts, and it does not accept any fees or share in legal judgements awarded to clients it represents in court. Starting in 1974, the SPLC set aside money for its endowment stating that it was "convinced that the day come when non-profit groups no longer be able to rely on support through mail because of posting and printing costs". For 2016, its endowment was approximately $319 million per its annual report and SPLC spent 68% of its revenue on programs."

 


 
A reasonably intelligent person would have to ask themselves if any of this 'hit piece' is true outside of the side show equivocation and resourceful apologetics...It's a bit disturbing and disappointing if not illuminating. Wish I had the time to look further. I always respected this organization for taking on the 'Klan' but it seems like as in everything else, money spoils the day again...
Admittedly I'm not clearly informed if my shallow perception is askew to reality in this case.


aflanigan
Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity
aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male
Zodiac: Aquarius
Chinese Yr: Rat


Posted: Sep 1, 2017 - 6:22am

 miamizsun wrote: 
This strikes me as more of a hit piece than credible journalism.

He's got some tepid scare quotes, but where is the context? He could have easily done some digging on the hundreds/thousands of other 501(c)3 nonprofits in the US, both conservative, progressive, nonpartisan, etc. to buttress his insinuations, i.e. to find out if other such orgs. hold offshore assets, how much their salaries for top employees tend to be, etc.

The inclusion of editorializing comments and criticisms from anti-LGBT organizations it has labeled "Hate groups" (not sure how that's not true) seems to be fairly irrelevant to the issue of whether what they are doing is a) unusual, b) illegal, or c) unethical.

They seem to have been upfront about wanting to have a nest egg stashed away to deal with the vagaries of fundraising, and started decades ago. Not surprising that like many businesses and entities, they want to shelter their assets from taxes if possible. From Wikipedia:

"The SPLC's activities, including litigation, are supported by fundraising efforts, and it does not accept any fees or share in legal judgements awarded to clients it represents in court. Starting in 1974, the SPLC set aside money for its endowment stating that it was "convinced that the day come when non-profit groups no longer be able to rely on support through mail because of posting and printing costs".<117> For 2016, its endowment was approximately $319 million per its annual report and SPLC spent 68% of its revenue on programs.<1>"

 

Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 27, 28, 29  Next