Avg rating:
Your rating:
Total ratings: 2679
Length: 9:42
Plays (last 30 days): 0
Cheers, tulfan.
"Live Bullet" was a great live album, before Bob became mega-popular.
The thing of it is, Miles was smart enough (e.g. Bob Dylan, Neil Young, Joni Mitchell, Lucinda Williams) to hire really, really good musicians and give them space to play and create,
He and the band members use a "circle of 5ths" to arrange notes, chords, harmonics, melodics...tones.
So there's a structure but freedom to move (like John Mayhall says).
* Mayall
The thing of it is, Miles was smart enough (e.g. Bob Dylan, Neil Young, Joni Mitchell, Lucinda Williams) to hire really, really good musicians and give them space to play and create,
He and the band members use a "circle of 5ths" to arrange notes, chords, harmonics, melodics...tones.
So there's a structure but freedom to move (like John Mayhall says).
To say Davis "hired" Bill Evans or "hired" Coltrane or the rest is to diminish each one's individual genius. These guys had all been working together one way or another for years.
The thing of it is, Miles was smart enough (e.g. Bob Dylan, Neil Young, Joni Mitchell, Lucinda Williams) to hire really, really good musicians and give them space to play and create,
He and the band members use a "circle of 5ths" to arrange notes, chords, harmonics, melodics...tones.
So there's a structure but freedom to move (like John Mayhall says).
And, it seems to work very well!!
You're so right. Miles was such a hack. What did he ever do for music? He certainly can't hold a candle to Rush or Bob Seger, who you rate "8"! No doubt Miles spent many a tortured, sleepless night, cursing his fate; "Why, oh why, can't I have the talent of Bob Seger? Why, WHY, WHYYYYYYYYYYY?!".
Easy there. Each artist has their place and no comparison of their particular genres would be apt or fair. Being raised in Seger country I grew weary of his "hits" long ago but if one dug deep he is/was quite accomplished. Miles, as an innovator, was likely subjected to more scrutiny than he deserved but that is often the cost for a true "artist". I appreciate both aforementioned artists and am most grateful that Miles led me to learn about and appreciate pianist Bill Evans. I was also quite interested about the time Miles spent in Detroit.
Still trying to figure out the circle of fifths, when I hear these guys play.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circle_of_fifths
In the town where I went to college the closest liquor store was downtown, on small traffic circle, which the music students called... you guessed it... the "Circle of Fifths".
Still trying to figure out the circle of fifths, when I hear these guys play.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circle_of_fifths
Thank You for the info.
sublime...just sublime....
as is the whole album.
I Agree!!
as is the whole album.
It's that river thing that make crazy cats our of normal people.
I've seen it.
Like Chuck Berry, Uncle Tupelo, Wilco, Son Volt. Same place...different time...same river.
Same old same old. Every artists tunes have the same walking bass, with a load of tuneless wanking over the top, jazz what is it good for?
"Stupidity has a certain charm - Ignorance does not" - Frank Zappa.
It's like the French say: "Magnifique"!
And so was Bill Evans, John Coltrane and Cannonball Adderly. and they all played on this album too.
One of the many reasons this is called a "seminal work".
The thing of it is, Miles was smart enough (e.g. Bob Dylan, Neil Young, Joni Mitchell, Lucinda Williams) to hire really, really good musicians and give them space to play and create,
He and the band members use a "circle of 5ths" to arrange notes, chords, harmonics, melodics...tones.
So there's a structure but freedom to move (like John Mayhall says).
This album is now 60 years old - a year older than I am. I was introduced to it when I was 21 or 22 - a time when my tastes ranged from Elton John to Steely Dan, Pink Floyd to Steeleye Span, Bowie to Tull, with heavy doses of Zepplin and Hawkwind balanced by Kate Bush and Talking Heads. I wasn't afraid to explore diffetent musical genres but knew fuck all about jazz beyond the Steely Dan and Joni influences. While my folks had raised me on 40s swing Big Bands like Glen Miller and Benny Goodman I'd never heard anything like Miles. Immediately hooked. I went forwards and backwards in Miles's catalogue - the earlier covers of classics were "nice", later Bitches Brew fusion stuff was (still is) nearly unlistenable to my ears. Over the years I've enjoyed his explorations into other territories - love Aura and Doobop especially. But Kinda Blue has remained a very particular form of aural Comfort Food. Anyone moaning about it needs to sit down with their mellow of choice and a fine set of speakers or headphones and just let it flow. Take the time to REALLY listen.
Yes! I listen to it directly. But also I use a mix of Miles Davis, Dizzy Gillespie, Thelonius Monk, and Dave Brubeck when I have people over... the music helps make it elegant and enjoyable.
And so was Bill Evans, John Coltrane and Cannonball Adderly. and they all played on this album too.
One of the many reasons this is called a "seminal work".
memoryboxer wrote:
Yes! They did it together with a loose idea and then ...just created from air. Those 9 mins and 45 seconds were set aside by God. She sat amongst them, cheering, cajoling and laughing as they played. I know they felt and saw her but kept it to themselves.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circle_of_fifths
Wow!
Thank you, idiot_wind, for helping to educate me musically. This "circle of fifths" insight into music theory just blows my mind. It reminds me how much I wish I'd studied music in college.
But that's another story.Thank all that brought RP into my life.
Excellent take!
Miles
encore
et souvent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circle_of_fifths
Word ...
Know what you mean, but when you listen to these sessions as a unified thing what makes it amazing is finding them all working together. The dif between Miles and Coltrane in the early shift is just so fucking FLAT. Like a thick dark line. What a record. Genius behind all this.
Which is more engaging: Coltrane on this album where's he'a playing with a top notch group.
Or him playing with his own group on Giant Steps or Favorite Things. I mean McCoy Tyner was at top of his game. on piano and Coltrane knew it.
Only the train maybe...
But on this album he lets Coltrane and Adderly "outplay" him at times. This format was adopted in the next decade by alot of RnR bands.
Rebecca and Bill moved from Paradise before the fires hit. They're OK but all of their friends from Paradise lost their homes.
I emailed Bill to see if they got out OK. Obviously radio is still going...
Is that a rhetorical question? Jazz, what is it good for? Well, for one thing, it's the *only* art form that exclusively originated and was mastered in America. It evolves from the history — slavery, blues, gospel, folk. For everything else — movies, painting, all the others — Americans were not first and never necessarily did it better or more incisively than anyone from UK, France, Russia, etc. That's what it's good for. It's *American* music and great art. That's just for starters. And Miles would have been the very first to ask you what your dumb ass question was good for?
Thank you, kingart.
You saved me a lot of typing. ; )
hbs47, what?
Is that a rhetorical question? Jazz, what is it good for? Well, for one thing, it's the *only* art form that exclusively originated and was mastered in America. It evolves from the history -- slavery, blues, gospel, folk. For everything else -- movies, painting, all the others -- Americans were not first and never necessarily did it better or more incisively than anyone from UK, France, Russia, etc. That's what it's good for. It's *American* music and great art. That's just for starters. And Miles would have been the very first to ask you what your dumb ass question was good for?
A1
You said it right, improv is not easy. When you get musicians like these guys they make improv look easy, but it is NOT at all. If done poorly is sounds cacophonous.
You certainly have committed one by apparently dissin' this performance.
If you believe John Coltrane and Davis are 'punishment', I'll be the first to be flogged. Thank you, sir, may I have some more?
A1
But I still love this jazz jam.
You certainly have committed one by apparently dissin' this performance.
If you believe John Coltrane and Davis are 'punishment', I'll be the first to be flogged. Thank you, sir, may I have some more?
Oh you said it already! Now, here, same!
We're now down to nine.
Ardbeg . . . or maybe Lagavulin.
I'd go to that party, Mingus on the ipod to help you out!
along with a few other party favours to ensure the mellowness....
I had to jump in and concur that jazz is not always easy listening for me either. It definitely sets a mood though and I use it almost therapeutically because of that fact. Recently I discovered some Stan Getz with Oscar Peterson and Coleman Hawkins stuff I purchased for my late father who was a fan of each. It is quite amazing stuff in its own right as well. The few Coltrane cuts I have are simply amazing...
Are you genetically defective for not liking Miles? Perhaps, but you're definitely not alone. Frankly, I think it's more like you're in too big a hurry to hear something familiar or relatively familiar. Real jazz isn't always easy listening.
I love Miles; love Coltrane; love Brubeck; love the MJQ; love the Crusadaers; and love many, many others. But I wouldn't put them in my playlist for a cocktail party — unless it's late and everybody's feeling verrrrrrrrry mellow..
I'd go to that party, Mingus on the ipod to help you out!
along with a few other party favours to ensure the mellowness....
painkillers?
My buddy once told me an analogy of how he thinks of it and it rings true for me as well:
"Jazz is all the musicians playing their own song in closed rooms and every now and then someone opens the doors so they can hear each other."
.
Amen to that! (Swing it Shinjuku!)
I will never ridicule free-form jazz music again. It takes bravery to venture out where there are no boundaries. Miles Davis and his band did that, and they did it with style.
Well said!
I will never ridicule free-form jazz music again. It takes bravery to venture out where there are no boundaries. Miles Davis and his band did that, and they did it with style.
Never heard a collection of songs closer to perfection than Kind Of Blue. Its such a pleasure to hear after not listening to it for a while. The genius is that much more apparent.
Maybe a genetic defect?
Are you genetically defective for not liking Miles? Perhaps, but you're definitely not alone. Frankly, I think it's more like you're in too big a hurry to hear something familiar or relatively familiar. Real jazz isn't always easy listening.
I love Miles; love Coltrane; love Brubeck; love the MJQ; love the Crusadaers; and love many, many others. But I wouldn't put them in my playlist for a cocktail party — unless it's late and everybody's feeling verrrrrrrrry mellow..
and maybe a little on the dull side
This coming from someone in a "sea of calm".
and maybe a little on the dull side
That's what she said.
... and I learned to play the sax because of Morphine, Dire Straits, and so on.
Am I alone out here??
Maybe a genetic defect?
Great 50th anniversary remaster out on this.
Yet another remaster? I remember paying far too much for the 20-bit release which first fixed the tape speed problem. I think there have been several re-releases since.
Parker for me, but you can't deny Miles in having huge influence on 99% of todays jazz cats.
I can't answer that, but I can tell you I feel the same way about funk, which gives my DH hives.
This is what God plays when he has a coffee break.
Great 50th anniversary remaster out on this.
You know how the sound of fingernails on a blackboard drives some people nuts and others don't know what you are talking about? The sax in this piece is fingernails-on-a-chalkboard annoying to me. I guess my DNA must be a few strands short...