Avg rating:
Your rating:
Total ratings: 1649
Length: 3:23
Plays (last 30 days): 3
Was waitin' around, but you never came
So I ran into Tony
He grabbed on my body
I told him I missed you
He told me he loved me
And hey, I liked the way he said my name
That's all he had to say
The damage is done, but so is the wait
And I tried not to run cause it would be a mistake
But it would be a mistake if I just took my time
Cause I'd be waiting around just to pay for your crimes
And hey, I know what it takes to be wrong but it feels all right to me
Even though I know you let me down
I don't know why I can't come around
And even though I know my mind is sound
Couldn't walk away from what I've found
Your honesty's good but too much is bad
And I've been trying to hold on to something I've never had
Cause I've never had you just as I have you now
That you're afraid of losin' but you're not scared enough
Hey wait, you wipe that smile right off of your face
Cause I don't know where it came from
Even if I know I won't be found
I will still be hiding underground
Even if I go outside I find
You've already left me far behind
Even when this song comes crashing down
I don't wanna hear another sound
No I don't wanna hear another sound
You should make it your life's work to drag the careers of Adele and Amy Winehouse out from the dark shadows where they currently dwell in obscurity....
Both great voices, but I think Norah Jones is more interesting musically (and lyrically) than either of them. Just my preference! I guess I'm just not cool enough to appreciate obscure talents like Adele and Amy Winehouse.
Well, Amy Winehouse is deceased, so I guess she could be considered to be dwelling in shadows or obscurity, but Adele has won several Grammy awards and sold over 150 million albums worldwide - I wouldn't call her "obscure" by any definition.
You should make it your life's work to drag the careers of Adele and Amy Winehouse out from the dark shadows where they currently dwell in obscurity....
Both great voices, but I think Norah Jones is more interesting musically (and lyrically) than either of them. Just my preference! I guess I'm just not cool enough to appreciate obscure talents like Adele and Amy Winehouse.
Yes..I mean it isn't like Adele has ever gotten any Facebook likes or been seen outside her studio apartment. lmao
lol I totally hear this.
Interesting how a middling talent like this gets all this alt airplay whilst huge talents like Amy Winehouse or Adele are ignored.
Ah, the not-so-wise-king, reminding us all that underneath his cool sophisticated exterior beats the heart of a simple troll...
she is never trying to be sexy, she is a serious musician and human being who happens to be female.
I agree, still thinks she's sexy
I'm on meds. After reading a couple sentences of this comment my brain started reading it in Yoda's voice.
On "Meds" we are
unclehud wrote:
Check your pulse.
Yep... it's a flat line.
You should make it your life's work to drag the careers of Adele and Amy Winehouse out from the dark shadows where they currently dwell in obscurity....
Both great voices, but I think Norah Jones is more interesting musically (and lyrically) than either of them. Just my preference! I guess I'm just not cool enough to appreciate obscure talents like Adele and Amy Winehouse.
What's your point?
Adele and Amy Winehouse are being ignored? Really?
Do please share your talent rating algorithm—objective, of course. I'm sure Bill & Rebecca would be quite interested as would the rest of us.
I do sooo agree!
A) I didn't quote you out of context. Not sure why you can't figure that out. I simply replied to someone who did quote you out of context. It must be said that to reply to your endless tome needlessly fills up yet another page, effectively bumping all the more succinct comments on the board.
B) Lighten up for God's sake. You like Nora's early work and are not thrilled with the new disk. We get it. You don't need to rewrite "War & Peace". Crack a brewski and listen to something else.
Err....On_the_Beach & Calypso.........what!? Heh!
I like it!
Highlow
American Net'Zen
Check your pulse.
she is never trying to be sexy, she is a serious musician and human being who happens to be female.
She's a fine musician and singer who definitely deserves respect, but take a look at the CD cover. I think it's safe to say that she's trying to look sexy. It's working for me.
Perhaps you have, but I detect no lisping in this song. Maybe you've been listening to too much Barbara Walters.
she is never trying to be sexy, she is a serious musician and human being who happens to be female.
Peter_Bradshaw wrote:
Yes black321, I can certainly see that. D'oh!
Yes black321, I can certainly see that. D'oh!
https://itunes.apple.com/album/...little-broken-hearts/id507325356 according to google.
you live in freaking san jose, get over it.............
uh no.
Apparently, it's a bonus track on the deluxe edition.
However, I do not want let answer you .
Do not wait from me, either now or in the future, the "politically correct", the "convenient", the "innocent sympathy", the "infatuation", about any artist who plays here. And if there are exceptions, it is because of my sentimental side.
I have for me, each musical work that is being proposed by an artist, is unique, and it is like the first.
And when analyzing consciously this work, we must put aside the credits, merits, successes already achieved, awards, the commercial weight of the name in the market, the celebrity. Staying distant and exempt from these restrictions, the most often subvert and distort, benefit or harm, the analysis of concrete work.
The main "sin" of the latter album, is a mistake to think that the artist can resolve the situation, with a few studio sessions with ingenious and easy, and even vulgar, musical solutions, and presenting them as if they were the result of musical development, the culmination of many years of work, a decade, justifying it as a requirement to provide change of musical and artistic direction.
We all know that after reaching a certain level of commercial success, the artists brake intense fighting, either by competition, new talent emerging, for maintaining the "status" by the pressure of the objectives of the business, and contract enforcement inherent.
In the field of music can not improvise everything, not everything can "over the knee" because the expectations generated by this artist were high, and listen and meditate on the last proposed album, there is a huge deficit of creativity/inspiration, maturity, uncertainty on course and style, the matrix musical, beyond that the songs were not sufficiently worked the instrumental level, because the basis on which they are conceived, not allow to go further. "When we do not have a dog, we hunted with cat". No, thanks.
Only our "I sentimental" makes us, perhaps, even get a little attached to this artist, as always we feel about our first love.
I also think, after passing the phase of this disc, of precipitate and occasional character, with more reflection, and means of support, adequate musicians, etc, Norah might be able to shine again.
By the way, say, for a young lady of 33 years old, it would be nice to go over to the gym, jogging, and taking care of a proper diet to avoid having to wear "kilts" in their performances live on stage ....
Now (On_The_Beach), about the "out of context", you are. That you are decontextualize what I said, why are you removing a phrase of my entire comment. An ability to "smart-ass". Not pass.
Then I'll remind you again, my entire comment, and maybe now you understand better ....
calypsus_1 wrote:
Your generosity and kindness. You can get "right in picture". But not so. I'm obviously a different perspective about "doing thing differently." Evil things are when an artist needs the permittivity and complacency of fans. Everything on the contrary, an artist needs rigor and demands constant from the audience, just like the artists remain on alert, and awake to new challenges.
"she's a cutie?", but surely it is, and it was never in question, everything in its right place. I'm in "the first row" of those who are sad and surprised by the circumstances that led to the artist Norah J. choose to follow this path lately. But I try not to mix and confuse, analysis and artistic rigor, with sympathy.
And you remember what I'll say now: The audience will be very alert and expectant, not to say "on the back foot" with the work that the artist Norah Jones may submit in the future. Is it, "the first time, anyone can fall, but the second one only falls whoever".
I'm sorry to say this, would not be so sincere, go so far, but the truth is that content, of the last record of Norah Jones, negatively affected in me, the level of interest and hearing, not only now, as records discographic previous, as i fear affecting decisively in the future. I hope not.
A) I didn't quote you out of context. Not sure why you can't figure that out. I simply replied to someone who did quote you out of context. It must be said that to reply to your endless tome needlessly fills up yet another page, effectively bumping all the more succinct comments on the board.
B) Lighten up for God's sake. You like Nora's early work and are not thrilled with the new disk. We get it. You don't need to rewrite "War & Peace". Crack a brewski and listen to something else.
Oh sure, quote him out of context!
.
It is not my intention to dwell too much on this subject, the troubled and confusing stage that crosses the artistic life of this artist, because I have already made it clear what I think about it.
However, I do not want let answer you .
Do not wait from me, either now or in the future, the "politically correct", the "convenient", the "innocent sympathy", the "infatuation", about any artist who plays here. And if there are exceptions, it is because of my sentimental side.
I have for me, each musical work that is being proposed by an artist, is unique, and it is like the first.
And when analyzing consciously this work, we must put aside the credits, merits, successes already achieved, awards, the commercial weight of the name in the market, the celebrity. Staying distant and exempt from these restrictions, the most often subvert and distort, benefit or harm, the analysis of concrete work.
The main "sin" of the latter album, is a mistake to think that the artist can resolve the situation, with a few studio sessions with ingenious and easy, and even vulgar, musical solutions, and presenting them as if they were the result of musical development, the culmination of many years of work, a decade, justifying it as a requirement to provide change of musical and artistic direction.
We all know that after reaching a certain level of commercial success, the artists brake intense fighting, either by competition, new talent emerging, for maintaining the "status" by the pressure of the objectives of the business, and contract enforcement inherent.
In the field of music can not improvise everything, not everything can "over the knee" because the expectations generated by this artist were high, and listen and meditate on the last proposed album, there is a huge deficit of creativity/inspiration, maturity, uncertainty on course and style, the matrix musical, beyond that the songs were not sufficiently worked the instrumental level, because the basis on which they are conceived, not allow to go further. "When we do not have a dog, we hunted with cat". No, thanks.
Only our "I sentimental" makes us, perhaps, even get a little attached to this artist, as always we feel about our first love.
I also think, after passing the phase of this disc, of precipitate and occasional character, with more reflection, and means of support, adequate musicians, etc, Norah might be able to shine again.
By the way, say, for a young lady of 33 years old, it would be nice to go over to the gym, jogging, and taking care of a proper diet to avoid having to wear "kilts" in their performances live on stage ....
Now (On_The_Beach), about the "out of context", you are. That you are decontextualize what I said, why are you removing a phrase of my entire comment. An ability to "smart-ass". Not pass.
Then I'll remind you again, my entire comment, and maybe now you understand better ....
calypsus_1 wrote:
Your generosity and kindness. You can get "right in picture". But not so. I'm obviously a different perspective about "doing thing differently." Evil things are when an artist needs the permittivity and complacency of fans. Everything on the contrary, an artist needs rigor and demands constant from the audience, just like the artists remain on alert, and awake to new challenges.
"she's a cutie?", but surely it is, and it was never in question, everything in its right place. I'm in "the first row" of those who are sad and surprised by the circumstances that led to the artist Norah J. choose to follow this path lately. But I try not to mix and confuse, analysis and artistic rigor, with sympathy.
And you remember what I'll say now: The audience will be very alert and expectant, not to say "on the back foot" with the work that the artist Norah Jones may submit in the future. Is it, "the first time, anyone can fall, but the second one only falls whoever".
I'm sorry to say this, would not be so sincere, go so far, but the truth is that content, of the last record of Norah Jones, negatively affected in me, the level of interest and hearing, not only now, as records discographic previous, as i fear affecting decisively in the future. I hope not.
Apparently, it's a bonus track on the deluxe edition.
nice - best track on the album and it's not "on" the album. So, where does that leave the rest of us who paid for the cd? Classy move, Norah. I now feel zero guilt about illegally downloading this song.
And you remember what I'll say now: The audience will be very alert and expectant, not to say "on the back foot" with the work that the artist Norah Jones may submit in the future. Is it, "the first time, anyone can fall, but the second one only falls whoever".
exactly! er, wait a minute...
Oh sure, quote him out of context!
And you remember what I'll say now: The audience will be very alert and expectant, not to say "on the back foot" with the work that the artist Norah Jones may submit in the future. Is it, "the first time, anyone can fall, but the second one only falls whoever".
exactly! er, wait a minute...
Your generosity and kindness. You can get "right in picture". But not so. I'm obviously a different perspective about "doing thing differently." Evil things are when an artist needs the permittivity and complacency of fans. Everything on the contrary, an artist needs rigor and demands constant from the audience, just like the artists remain on alert, and awake to new challenges.
"she's a cutie?", but surely it is, and it was never in question, everything in its right place. I'm in "the first row" of those who are sad and surprised by the circumstances that led to the artist Norah J. choose to follow this path lately. But I try not to mix and confuse, analysis and artistic rigor, with sympathy.
And you remember what I'll say now: The audience will be very alert and expectant, not to say "on the back foot" with the work that the artist Norah Jones may submit in the future. Is it, "the first time, anyone can fall, but the second one only falls whoever".
I'm sorry to say this, would not be so sincere, go so far, but the truth is that content, of the last record of Norah Jones, negatively affected in me, the level of interest and hearing, not only now, as records discographic previous, as i fear affecting decisively in the future. I hope not.
.
cmarcan wrote:
Apparently, it's a bonus track on the deluxe edition.
There's no song on the album by that title, at least what I saw on Amazon.com MP3 downloads. Perhaps it's a lyric in one of the songs?
triviagal wrote:
I'm on meds. After reading a couple sentences of this comment my brain started reading it in Yoda's voice.
.
triviagal wrote:
I'm on meds. After reading a couple sentences of this comment my brain started reading it in Yoda's voice.
Diluted? Deluded? Quaaluded? Please clarify.
Your generosity and kindness. You can get "right in picture". But not so. I'm obviously a different perspective about "doing thing differently." Evil things are when an artist needs the permittivity and complacency of fans. Everything on the contrary, an artist needs rigor and demands constant from the audience, just like the artists remain on alert, and awake to new challenges.
"she's a cutie?", but surely it is, and it was never in question, everything in its right place. I'm in "the first row" of those who are sad and surprised by the circumstances that led to the artist Norah J. choose to follow this path lately. But I try not to mix and confuse, analysis and artistic rigor, with sympathy.
And you remember what I'll say now: The audience will be very alert and expectant, not to say "on the back foot" with the work that the artist Norah Jones may submit in the future. Is it, "the first time, anyone can fall, but the second one only falls whoever".
I'm sorry to say this, would not be so sincere, go so far, but the truth is that content, of the last record of Norah Jones, negatively affected in me, the level of interest and hearing, not only now, as records discographic previous, as i fear affecting decisively in the future. I hope not.
I'm on meds. After reading a couple sentences of this comment my brain started reading it in Yoda's voice.
It is a bit out there for most 'pop'.
I like it. Beat.
Your generosity and kindness. You can get "right in picture". But not so. I'm obviously a different perspective about "doing thing differently." Evil things are when an artist needs the permittivity and complacency of fans. Everything on the contrary, an artist needs rigor and demands constant from the audience, just like the artists remain on alert, and awake to new challenges.
"she's a cutie?", but surely it is, and it was never in question, everything in its right place. I'm in "the first row" of those who are sad and surprised by the circumstances that led to the artist Norah J. choose to follow this path lately. But I try not to mix and confuse, analysis and artistic rigor, with sympathy.
And you remember what I'll say now: The audience will be very alert and expectant, not to say "on the back foot" with the work that the artist Norah Jones may submit in the future. Is it, "the first time, anyone can fall, but the second one only falls whoever".
I'm sorry to say this, would not be so sincere, go so far, but the truth is that content, of the last record of Norah Jones, negatively affected in me, the level of interest and hearing, not only now, as records discographic previous, as i fear affecting decisively in the future. I hope not.
.
cmarcan wrote:
I think this is part of the "real Norah Jones". It's odd, because many people criticized her prior recordings as being "all-the-same". I guess you can't please everyone.
Already has a couple from me after I had the Vasectomy reversed at her pleading request. Have your peeps call my peeps and maybe I can hook you up with her....
Yeah, now that you mention it, definitely the same ring to it...
.
OLDTIREDJEFFRO wrote:
Figures......
Sexy Norah
Leave your nasty comments, John. Not appropiate!
She's mine!
How can I tweet this song, please...?
Anybody done that?
deluded or diluted, either one.
"I Don't Wanna Hear Another Sound"..... hmm? Curious....and, why the hell, are you (Norah) so convinced that we will "ride this wave"? 're not
She's cute, but I still don't think she's sexy.
black321 wrote:
What's your point?
Forgive rhlrstn. He thought he was on the pornhub site. And . . . guys like him allow us to realize how much further some people still need to evolve to catch up with the enlightened folks who appear much more frequently on these posts.