Moby — All The Hurts We Made
Album: More Fast Songs About The ApocalypseAvg rating:
Your rating:
Total ratings: 1805
Length: 3:36
Plays (last 30 days): 2
share
tweet
Won't you save a place for this?
Facing all there is to miss
A change of heart
A change of pain
It was going wrong
For the longest time
I'd rather die than feel this pain
What to do, with old dreams?
To feel a new kind of pain
As the sun pulls behind the sky
I'd rather die than feel this pain
Give up the world give up my life
Give up the pain give up the right
Give up the love give up the shade
Give up the blame for all the hurts we made
Give up the sun give up the night
Give up the fear give up the fight
Give up the guilt for all the ways we strayed
Give up the pain for all the hurts we made
Facing all there is to miss
A change of heart
A change of pain
It was going wrong
For the longest time
I'd rather die than feel this pain
What to do, with old dreams?
To feel a new kind of pain
As the sun pulls behind the sky
I'd rather die than feel this pain
Give up the world give up my life
Give up the pain give up the right
Give up the love give up the shade
Give up the blame for all the hurts we made
Give up the sun give up the night
Give up the fear give up the fight
Give up the guilt for all the ways we strayed
Give up the pain for all the hurts we made
Comments (76)add comment
Call me Ishmael :o)
Sweet.
I worked the early morning shift at a rec center during the Olympics when they would only play the international feed from the IOC. Instead of commericials they would just show city scenes of either Tokyo or Beijing with this song playing on a constant loop. Thanks RP for bringing back these sweat drenched nightmares!!!
fredriley wrote:
Apparently Moby is a great-great-great nephew of Herman Melville, or so he was told by his parents.
I figured out why yer man is called Moby. His first names are Richard Melville, the name of the author who wrote the famous book Moby Dick.
Call me Ishmael :o)
Apparently Moby is a great-great-great nephew of Herman Melville, or so he was told by his parents.
I figured out why yer man is called Moby. His first names are Richard Melville, the name of the author who wrote the famous book Moby Dick.
Call me Ishmael :o)
Call me Ishmael :o)
dwhayslett wrote:
The clip is from "X-Men: Days of Future Past", if I'm not mistaken. Not sure if that's quite what you're asking.
Thanks, yes it is. I don't enjoy the Marvel movie experience so haven't seen any recent ones, but that CGI stuff looks astonishing.
The clip is from "X-Men: Days of Future Past", if I'm not mistaken. Not sure if that's quite what you're asking.
Thanks, yes it is. I don't enjoy the Marvel movie experience so haven't seen any recent ones, but that CGI stuff looks astonishing.
Kind of "Moodybluish" Like it.
DaidyBoy wrote:
The clip is from "X-Men: Days of Future Past", if I'm not mistaken. Not sure if that's quite what you're asking.
Amazing! Where did you find this?
The clip is from "X-Men: Days of Future Past", if I'm not mistaken. Not sure if that's quite what you're asking.
25demayo wrote:
Who would say such a thing? Inconceivable!
Bill, 62% of those that have rated this song have rated it 7 or higher. You're not in the minority. 
Who would say such a thing? Inconceivable!
easmann wrote:
Amazing! Where did you find this?
Amazing! Where did you find this?
Moby is hit or miss for me. This tune is a HIT! Great tune!
25demayo wrote:
2 years later 66% have rated this song a 7 or higher. It's growing on RP listeners.
Bill, 62% of those that have rated this song have rated it 7 or higher. You're not in the minority.
2 years later 66% have rated this song a 7 or higher. It's growing on RP listeners.
unclehud wrote:
You're assuming the drumbeat is off, and the artist/producer/label released the song anyway?
Perhaps what you're hearing is the "backbeat" drum stroke. That's common in a lot of blues and some rock music. For example, in 4/4 time (1-2-3-4-1-2-3-4) emphasis is usually place on beats 1 and 3; but it does have to be.
If you count "ands" (1-and-2-and-3-and-4-and-1-and-2-and-3-and 4) you can more easily hear the backbeat.
By the way, consistently hitting the backbeat is difficult, especially when a song's tempo is as fast as this one is.
Freakin' love all the music nerds here.
You're assuming the drumbeat is off, and the artist/producer/label released the song anyway?
Perhaps what you're hearing is the "backbeat" drum stroke. That's common in a lot of blues and some rock music. For example, in 4/4 time (1-2-3-4-1-2-3-4) emphasis is usually place on beats 1 and 3; but it does have to be.
If you count "ands" (1-and-2-and-3-and-4-and-1-and-2-and-3-and 4) you can more easily hear the backbeat.
By the way, consistently hitting the backbeat is difficult, especially when a song's tempo is as fast as this one is.
Freakin' love all the music nerds here.
unclehud wrote:
You're assuming the drumbeat is off, and the artist/producer/label released the song anyway?
Perhaps what you're hearing is the "backbeat" drum stroke. That's common in a lot of blues and some rock music. For example, in 4/4 time (1-2-3-4-1-2-3-4) emphasis is usually place on beats 1 and 3; but it does have to be.
If you count "ands" (1-and-2-and-3-and-4-and-1-and-2-and-3-and 4) you can more easily hear the backbeat.
By the way, consistently hitting the backbeat is difficult, especially when a song's tempo is as fast as this one is.
Isn't this what jazz musicians call syncopation? Anyway, the drumbeat sounds great to this philistine...
You're assuming the drumbeat is off, and the artist/producer/label released the song anyway?
Perhaps what you're hearing is the "backbeat" drum stroke. That's common in a lot of blues and some rock music. For example, in 4/4 time (1-2-3-4-1-2-3-4) emphasis is usually place on beats 1 and 3; but it does have to be.
If you count "ands" (1-and-2-and-3-and-4-and-1-and-2-and-3-and 4) you can more easily hear the backbeat.
By the way, consistently hitting the backbeat is difficult, especially when a song's tempo is as fast as this one is.
Isn't this what jazz musicians call syncopation? Anyway, the drumbeat sounds great to this philistine...
That is one seriously weird album cover. I could see a caption like "My plastic polar bear friends and I are coming to get you."
Keeps things interesting!
Keeps things interesting!
jp33442 wrote:
It's you
Is it me or is moby boring
It's you
SmackDaddy wrote:
Isn't a 1/2 beat off the downbeat?
The downbeat is the first beat in the bar.
Isn't a 1/2 beat off the downbeat?
The downbeat is the first beat in the bar.
This sounds like background music for most of the YouTube videos I watch
...but it's good :)
...but it's good :)
I usually enjoy Moby, but this eurodance beat behind destroy the other layers of sound. Or maybe it's just because I'm trying to work!
SmackDaddy wrote:
Isn't a 1/2 beat off the downbeat?
Thanks for getting what I was saying. ;)
Isn't a 1/2 beat off the downbeat?
Thanks for getting what I was saying. ;)
unclehud wrote:
Saying it was "off" was actually a compliment. I completely GET that it is difficult, that is why it is so impressive. To say it is "off" is not a negative comment. Thanks for spelling out more clearly to folks what my point was. :) PEACE!
AhhtheMusic wrote:
You're assuming the drumbeat is off, and the artist/producer/label released the song anyway?
Perhaps what you're hearing is the "backbeat" drum stroke. That's common in a lot of blues and some rock music. For example, in 4/4 time (1-2-3-4-1-2-3-4) emphasis is usually place on beats 1 and 3; but it does have to be.
If you count "ands" (1-and-2-and-3-and-4-and-1-and-2-and-3-and 4) you can more easily hear the backbeat.
By the way, consistently hitting the backbeat is difficult, especially when a song's tempo is as fast as this one is.
I find it amazing to hear the drum beat 1/2 beat off of the actual beat of the song. Very odd, off putting and if I didn't think it was electronically mixed, I would commend the drummer for being able to maintain that off-rhythm throughout the entire cut.
You're assuming the drumbeat is off, and the artist/producer/label released the song anyway?
Perhaps what you're hearing is the "backbeat" drum stroke. That's common in a lot of blues and some rock music. For example, in 4/4 time (1-2-3-4-1-2-3-4) emphasis is usually place on beats 1 and 3; but it does have to be.
If you count "ands" (1-and-2-and-3-and-4-and-1-and-2-and-3-and 4) you can more easily hear the backbeat.
By the way, consistently hitting the backbeat is difficult, especially when a song's tempo is as fast as this one is.
Saying it was "off" was actually a compliment. I completely GET that it is difficult, that is why it is so impressive. To say it is "off" is not a negative comment. Thanks for spelling out more clearly to folks what my point was. :) PEACE!
Loving this loud in my headphones. It's not helping me with the excel spreadsheet though....
Somebody call the wambulance -- Moby's pissin' and moanin' ... again 
unclehud wrote:
I love intelligent replies. I just learned something.
AhhtheMusic wrote:
You're assuming the drumbeat is off, and the artist/producer/label released the song anyway?
Perhaps what you're hearing is the "backbeat" drum stroke. That's common in a lot of blues and some rock music. For example, in 4/4 time (1-2-3-4-1-2-3-4) emphasis is usually place on beats 1 and 3; but it does have to be.
If you count "ands" (1-and-2-and-3-and-4-and-1-and-2-and-3-and 4) you can more easily hear the backbeat.
By the way, consistently hitting the backbeat is difficult, especially when a song's tempo is as fast as this one is.
I find it amazing to hear the drum beat 1/2 beat off of the actual beat of the song. Very odd, off putting and if I didn't think it was electronically mixed, I would commend the drummer for being able to maintain that off-rhythm throughout the entire cut.
You're assuming the drumbeat is off, and the artist/producer/label released the song anyway?
Perhaps what you're hearing is the "backbeat" drum stroke. That's common in a lot of blues and some rock music. For example, in 4/4 time (1-2-3-4-1-2-3-4) emphasis is usually place on beats 1 and 3; but it does have to be.
If you count "ands" (1-and-2-and-3-and-4-and-1-and-2-and-3-and 4) you can more easily hear the backbeat.
By the way, consistently hitting the backbeat is difficult, especially when a song's tempo is as fast as this one is.
I love intelligent replies. I just learned something.
Dude, did you just respond snarkily to your own previous comment? Either way, let go of the hangups, man, crank up the RP and poop loudly.
Posted 2 years ago by geodesmo:
geodesmo wrote:
OK Bill.... you got your self out of the dog house, momentarily at least by
following Moby with the Rolling Stones this evening Dec 24/2017
Happy Holidays.
Just hit the mute button. First time ever. I'm inspired to go have a crap, in silence.
Posted 2 years ago by geodesmo:
geodesmo wrote:
OK Bill.... you got your self out of the dog house, momentarily at least by
following Moby with the Rolling Stones this evening Dec 24/2017
Happy Holidays.
Just hit the mute button. First time ever. I'm inspired to go have a crap, in silence.
Oh putain quelle merde !
I think that if one very sad day Moby and Manu Chao expulse a tune together, it will be the end of the World. Those "artists" should be locked in jail for the rest of their days so our planet can sound a better way.
I think that if one very sad day Moby and Manu Chao expulse a tune together, it will be the end of the World. Those "artists" should be locked in jail for the rest of their days so our planet can sound a better way.
unclehud wrote:
Isn't a 1/2 beat off the downbeat?
AhhtheMusic wrote:
You're assuming the drumbeat is off, and the artist/producer/label released the song anyway?
Perhaps what you're hearing is the "backbeat" drum stroke. That's common in a lot of blues and some rock music. For example, in 4/4 time (1-2-3-4-1-2-3-4) emphasis is usually place on beats 1 and 3; but it does have to be.
If you count "ands" (1-and-2-and-3-and-4-and-1-and-2-and-3-and 4) you can more easily hear the backbeat.
By the way, consistently hitting the backbeat is difficult, especially when a song's tempo is as fast as this one is.
I find it amazing to hear the drum beat 1/2 beat off of the actual beat of the song. Very odd, off putting and if I didn't think it was electronically mixed, I would commend the drummer for being able to maintain that off-rhythm throughout the entire cut.
You're assuming the drumbeat is off, and the artist/producer/label released the song anyway?
Perhaps what you're hearing is the "backbeat" drum stroke. That's common in a lot of blues and some rock music. For example, in 4/4 time (1-2-3-4-1-2-3-4) emphasis is usually place on beats 1 and 3; but it does have to be.
If you count "ands" (1-and-2-and-3-and-4-and-1-and-2-and-3-and 4) you can more easily hear the backbeat.
By the way, consistently hitting the backbeat is difficult, especially when a song's tempo is as fast as this one is.
Isn't a 1/2 beat off the downbeat?
I enjoyed this tune. Went and checked my phone to see who it was, and I was certainly surprised it was Moby. Has an 80s feel to it, it’s a decent driving diddy.
Is it me or is moby boring
AhhtheMusic wrote:
You're assuming the drumbeat is off, and the artist/producer/label released the song anyway?
Perhaps what you're hearing is the "backbeat" drum stroke. That's common in a lot of blues and some rock music. For example, in 4/4 time (1-2-3-4 1-2-3-4) emphasis is usually place on beats 1 and 3; but it does not have to be.
If you count "ands" (1-and-2-and-3-and-4-and-1-and-2-and-3-and 4) you can more easily hear the backbeat.
By the way, consistently hitting the backbeat is very difficult, especially when a song's tempo is as fast as this one is.
I find it amazing to hear the drum beat 1/2 beat off of the actual beat of the song. Very odd, off putting and if I didn't think it was electronically mixed, I would commend the drummer for being able to maintain that off-rhythm throughout the entire cut.
You're assuming the drumbeat is off, and the artist/producer/label released the song anyway?
Perhaps what you're hearing is the "backbeat" drum stroke. That's common in a lot of blues and some rock music. For example, in 4/4 time (1-2-3-4 1-2-3-4) emphasis is usually place on beats 1 and 3; but it does not have to be.
If you count "ands" (1-and-2-and-3-and-4-and-1-and-2-and-3-and 4) you can more easily hear the backbeat.
By the way, consistently hitting the backbeat is very difficult, especially when a song's tempo is as fast as this one is.
WardM wrote:
I don't think I want to know.
Exiting song!
I don't think I want to know.
I find it amazing to hear the drum beat 1/2 beat off of the actual beat of the song. Very odd, off putting and if I didn't think it was electronically mixed, I would commend the drummer for being able to maintain that off-rhythm throughout the entire cut.
lizardking wrote:
*3rd Edit*
This track hits me differently each time you spin it BillG. Today, home from the desk job, starting to do yard work and listening (with the neighbors hehehe) on the BT speaker, following the Massive Attack cut, and preceding BillG's playlist-ending "station identification" (still got some FM in ya!) whatchamacallit-thingamajig, I'll go +1 to the 6 rating I skipped before.
Not hearing it on headphones helped a bit. And for sure, being home, in the sun, and legally attitude-adjusted, that helped too.
And I'm still laughing about Richard Melville Hall choosing Moby as his stage name. Good one, Moby Dick!
Long Live RP!!
New and Moby?
8 for now, long live RP!
*EDIT* My 2nd listening of this track (on headphones this time) and I'm only at a 7 now. Sorry Richard Melville (Moby, ha!) Hall, but your new tune is getting downgraded to a 7 by me...you still get props for inventing your own choir; that's crazy and cool.
*2ND EDIT* I'm double-downgrading to a 5 now. Something jarring about this track and how it "fits" into the regular Awesome RP mix.
8 for now, long live RP!
*EDIT* My 2nd listening of this track (on headphones this time) and I'm only at a 7 now. Sorry Richard Melville (Moby, ha!) Hall, but your new tune is getting downgraded to a 7 by me...you still get props for inventing your own choir; that's crazy and cool.
*2ND EDIT* I'm double-downgrading to a 5 now. Something jarring about this track and how it "fits" into the regular Awesome RP mix.
*3rd Edit*
This track hits me differently each time you spin it BillG. Today, home from the desk job, starting to do yard work and listening (with the neighbors hehehe) on the BT speaker, following the Massive Attack cut, and preceding BillG's playlist-ending "station identification" (still got some FM in ya!) whatchamacallit-thingamajig, I'll go +1 to the 6 rating I skipped before.
Not hearing it on headphones helped a bit. And for sure, being home, in the sun, and legally attitude-adjusted, that helped too.
And I'm still laughing about Richard Melville Hall choosing Moby as his stage name. Good one, Moby Dick!
Long Live RP!!
A bit thumpy.
This after the Vitamin C Quartet, Everloving, off the album, Tribute to Moby Album = Brilliant!
Bill, 62% of those that have rated this song have rated it 7 or higher. You're not in the minority.
The first several seconds I thought it was an old Wall of Voodoo track...
This just came on after a magnificent Sonny Landreth tune and all the hair on the back of my neck went into spasm.....so I came over to the computer to express myself, and started reading the comments below and suddenly realized that I have puked about this tune half a dozen times already......... at least I'm consistent ~ this sucks.
Bill, thank you for introducing me to this album and song. I listen to RP for my own entertainment and to find new music to share with my ecstatic dance tribe. I played this one last week and it got the room moving wildly. Complete success!
jmsmy wrote:
Is your apparent dislike of Jack White actually relevant to this song?
Moby is the opposite of Jack White - Underrated - opps i said it
Is your apparent dislike of Jack White actually relevant to this song?
Moby is the opposite of Jack White - Underrated - opps i said it
Exiting song !
I'm gonna buck the comment trend by saying I think this song isn't bad...not awesome, but quite ok...it has a slight Sisters of Mercy flavor, to me... I really don't love a lot of Moby's stuff, but I definitely appreciate his willingness to try different stuff, expand his range, etc. He's creative, even if not everyone's taste, including my own sometimes...
'Bill' who?
geodesmo wrote:
OK Bill.... you got your self out of the dog house, momentarily at least by following Moby with the Rolling Stones this evening Dec 24/2017
Happy Holidays.
How magnanimous of you.
If Bill feels the need to play to any part of the audience, it's probably to the majority that's rated this 6.something, rather than just those who've commented negatively. Fortunately, it seems (to me anyway) that Bill feels no such need, and plays what he likes. Thankfully.
OK Bill.... you got your self out of the dog house, momentarily at least by following Moby with the Rolling Stones this evening Dec 24/2017
Happy Holidays.
How magnanimous of you.
If Bill feels the need to play to any part of the audience, it's probably to the majority that's rated this 6.something, rather than just those who've commented negatively. Fortunately, it seems (to me anyway) that Bill feels no such need, and plays what he likes. Thankfully.
geodesmo wrote:
OK Bill.... you got your self out of the dog house, momentarily at least by following Moby with the Rolling Stones this evening Dec 24/2017
Happy Holidays.
Just hit the mute button. First time ever. I'm inspired to go have a crap, in silence.
OK Bill.... you got your self out of the dog house, momentarily at least by following Moby with the Rolling Stones this evening Dec 24/2017
Happy Holidays.
Just hit the mute button. First time ever. I'm inspired to go have a crap, in silence.
geodesmo wrote:
OK Bill.... you got your self out of the dog house, momentarily at least by following Moby with the Rolling Stones this evening Dec 24/2017
Happy Holidays.
SO, Bill - I don't see any positive comments at all. I thought maybe I was alone out there, but seems like consensus is that this is crap. I know you read these comments, you make remarks about them sometimes. Are you just poking us in the eye with a stick or is there some contrarian editorial reason you feel compelled to keep playing it?
Geo.
Geo.
OK Bill.... you got your self out of the dog house, momentarily at least by following Moby with the Rolling Stones this evening Dec 24/2017
Happy Holidays.
Oh dear this is just ...bad...
SO, Bill - I don't see any positive comments at all. I thought maybe I was alone out there, but seems like consensus is that this is crap. I know you read these comments, you make remarks about them sometimes. Are you just poking us in the eye with a stick or is there some contrarian editorial reason you feel compelled to keep playing it?
Geo.
Geo.
crappy is an understatement
How can the person who gave us Play also produce this dross?
Well, I clearly understand that intolerance is not a virtue. But...
...but...
...but...
...this is sooooooooooooooo crappy!!!
...but...
...but...
...this is sooooooooooooooo crappy!!!
Each beat of this "thing" sounds like a PSD appeal!
Upbeat Moby, no better upbeat. Man does not live by porcelain alone.
Wow it was so bad the first time I heard it a month ago it prompted me to write my first comment..... it got worse! Drew me to comment again!
This cacophony is horrible!
This cacophony is horrible!
smackiepipe wrote:
same.
I've always liked Moby, and most of Moby's output. But I'm not sure what he was going for with this one. First Moby song I actually don't like on first listen. YMMV.
same.
ziggytrix wrote:
I was thinking Covenant (United States of Mind/Northern Light sort of sound).
So I guess Moby has been listening to a lot of Bauhaus?
I was thinking Covenant (United States of Mind/Northern Light sort of sound).
geodesmo wrote:
Even Deadmaus wasn't this bad........ but hope it also gets out of RP rotation soon.
This is the first song ever on RP that I felt compelled to comment on.
BAD Moby, BAD boy.....BAD BAD!
GeoDesmo
BAD Moby, BAD boy.....BAD BAD!
GeoDesmo
Even Deadmaus wasn't this bad........ but hope it also gets out of RP rotation soon.
This is the first song ever on RP that I felt compelled to comment on.
BAD Moby, BAD boy.....BAD BAD!
GeoDesmo
BAD Moby, BAD boy.....BAD BAD!
GeoDesmo
listenin to this pale, pale synthesized riff makes me yearn for BLACK SABBATH
Boy, he's angry!
An unusually jarring transition (for RP) from the smoothness of Jonathan Wilson - Desert Raven. OUCH! I thought an output valve had blown. 
smackiepipe wrote:
likewise
I will pass this one
I've always liked Moby, and most of Moby's output. But I'm not sure what he was going for with this one. First Moby song I actually don't like on first listen. YMMV.
likewise
I will pass this one
new music from Moby....my ears are happy
Definitely works for me...
Deadmau5 and then, "theess"...
From an big 7 to a deserved 2.
IMHO, Moby is SO overrated!!!
From an big 7 to a deserved 2.
IMHO, Moby is SO overrated!!!
For a liker of both 'Porcelain' and 'Extreme Ways' this satisfies!
I've always liked Moby, and most of Moby's output. But I'm not sure what he was going for with this one. First Moby song I actually don't like on first listen. YMMV.
So I guess Moby has been listening to a lot of Bauhaus?
More. Moby that's a bit un-Moby, but really catchy.
He seems to like cover photos of him underwater.
He seems to like cover photos of him underwater.
New and Moby?
8 for now, long live RP!
*EDIT* My 2nd listening of this track (on headphones this time) and I'm only at a 7 now. Sorry Richard Melville (Moby, ha!) Hall, but your new tune is getting downgraded to a 7 by me...you still get props for inventing your own choir; that's crazy and cool.
*2ND EDIT* I'm double-downgrading to a 5 now. Something jarring about this track and how it "fits" into the regular Awesome RP mix.