Mike Huckabee’s son hanged a dog. Sarah Palin’s son stood on one. Tomi Lahren kicks hers. Mitt Romney drove with his on the roof of his car. Ted Cruz abandoned his. Kristi Noem shot hers. In conclusion, Republicans are a bunch of dog-hating sociopaths. Thank you for coming to my TEDTalk.
And Obama had one for dinner. He clearly loves dog (on a stick that he had to fetch).
Mike Huckabeeâs son hanged a dog.
Sarah Palinâs son stood on one.
Tomi Lahren kicks hers.
Mitt Romney drove with his on the roof of his car.
Ted Cruz abandoned his.
Kristi Noem shot hers.
In conclusion, Republicans are a bunch of dog-hating sociopaths.
Thank you for coming to my TEDTalk.
Mike Huckabeeâs son hanged a dog.
Sarah Palinâs son stood on one.
Tomi Lahren kicks hers.
Mitt Romney drove with his on the roof of his car.
Ted Cruz abandoned his.
Kristi Noem shot hers.
In conclusion, Republicans are a bunch of dog-hating sociopaths.
Thank you for coming to my TEDTalk.
Ken Chesebro used a secret Twitter account to aggressively promote the use of fake electors, supported by state legislators. He did this well before election day and continued doing so after that. He then LIED to investigators that he didn't have a secret Twitter account. But he got caught and his plea deal may be sunk.
I'm just trying to get you to explain how you think that legal concept relates to the Bidens.
You could'a just asked liked you did above instead of the way you did. Like I said we would have had a completely different conversation.
kcar wrote:
WTF is this supposed to even mean?
Kurt, when the dope clears from your mind, try reading Steely_D's post placed just below yours. Come back to reality, Kurt, and stay out of the pumpkin patch.
kcar wrote:
For my part, I just shrug my shoulders when you hype the latest Democratic "scandal."
I feel the same way when you parrot the latest democratic talking points.
kcar wrote:
Maybe we should stop sparring with each other for a while.
Good idea. I'm thinking that I need a drink in order to understand you anymore.
So what part of the very well known legal doctrine of The Fruit Of The Poisonous tree do you not understand ?
When I see an expression I do not understand, I usually highlight it and search google for that term and find out what it means.
You could have done the same and had a completely different conversation.
You chose a different path just to be obstinate.
Yes dear, I do understand that concept. I also remember that you posted
"Try the fruit of the poisonous tree argument ? Didn't work for Trump, should not work for Biden either."
I'm just trying to get you to explain how you think that legal concept relates to the Bidens. If you want to go for extra credit, you might remind me when and how Trump tried to use that concept as a defense (but please don't feel compelled—one lunacy at a time, thanks).
I think you're trying to claim that the Bidens can't use Smirnov's indictment to argue that "fruits of a poisonous tree" fatally taints all other and further investigation into their activities. If that's your claim, you seem to have a far greater belief in their guiltiness than...well, just about everyone right now. Comer and Gym Jordan excepted perhaps.
Maybe we should stop sparring with each other for a while. This is getting pretty tired. For my part, I just shrug my shoulders when you hype the latest Democratic "scandal."
We can all thank your cowardice and stupidity for the need of borking the thread by posting the full url.
Diddums, all you had to do was explain your screed a little more fully. When it comes to politics I don't have much faith in your ability to do the written equivalent of simple arithmetic so your mere presentation of Google search results doesn't further persuade me that you have anything to say that's acquainted with facts or logic.
So what part of the very well known legal doctrine of The Fruit Of The Poisonous tree do you not understand ?
It is not something that you smoke.
When I see an expression I do not understand, I usually highlight it and search google for that term and find out what it means.
You could have done the same and had a completely different conversation.
We can all thank your cowardice and stupidity for the need of borking the thread by posting the full url.
Diddums, all you had to do was explain your screed a little more fully. When it comes to politics I don't have much faith in your ability to do the written equivalent of simple arithmetic so your mere presentation of Google search results doesn't further persuade me that you have anything to say that's acquainted with facts or logic.
I've given you far more respect and leeway than most people posting here.
kcar wrote:
Kurt, when the dope clears from your mind, try reading Steely_D's post placed just below yours. Come back to reality, Kurt, and stay out of the pumpkin patch.
kcar wrote:
The URL displayed by hovering can be faked very easily.
I guess when Ronald is your IT guy I have to cut you a little slack.
For the last time ... here's the link that scares you and Ronald so much. I don't know how to fake anything like this ...
edit out borking link
Do you even know how to figure out the question being searched for ? Hint it starts with q= and has some + signs. We can all thank your cowardice and stupidity for the need of borking the thread by posting the full url.
And all of this because you were upset that a post not directed at you was beyond your comprehension.
It's really gonna mess with everyone's minds when Trump gets fined out of existence/maybe jailed which drains the GOP coffers and Biden agrees to bow out at the last minute due to a flare up of something or another. It's gonna look like musical chairs when the music stops playing.
kurtster wrote:Why don't you simply put your cursor over the hyperlink and look at what shows up in your toolbar. That is if you have that skill. I always do that before clicking on anyone's links.
Saves a lot of time and trouble.
Perhaps I might be responding to you a little differently if you hadn't started out this current exchange by insulting my intelligence. Didja ever think about that ?
Nobody is as stupid as you are pretending to be.
The URL displayed by hovering can be faked very easily. I did hover on your CLICKY and saw IIRC that it was a google.com page. At that point I figured that you could simply state your thought and explain your previous posted gibberish if you wanted to have a conversation. For the most part, I think you just want to yell (often repeating some idiotic pundtry you've read or watched) and proclaim once again that you've been Insulted! Patronized! Ignored and Dismissed!
Lord you can be such a delicate flower.
I've given you far more respect and leeway than most people posting here. I keep encouraging you to provide evidence for your opinions so that people will take you more seriously. Recently you pretty much rejected that possibility and effectively declared yourself a believer in truthiness. I thought this country got over that with Dubya's reign of error but no it seems like Trumpers are willing to swill the Kool=Aid that Donnie is selling them.
