That's pretty cool, but I'm not sure the world is ready for having beta sources floating around everywhere. Nickel-63 is a good choice, though. Wonder how they are separating out the nickel-63. I know how I'd look at doing it but I ain't telling.
When the Department of Justice announced its China Initiative in 2018, it said protecting national security was a goal.
But a new study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggests the initiativeâs investigations may have caused valuable researchers of Chinese descent to leave the U.S. for China.
The paper, âCaught in the crossfire: Fears of Chinese-American scientists,â doesnât confirm causation between the initiative and the departures. Its data, from 2010 to 2021, shows that the annual number of Chinese-descent scientists leaving the U.S. was steadily increasing before 2018.
But the trend greatly accelerated that year, the study found.
âThe migration has increased during those 12 years, from 900 scientists in 2010 to 2,621 in 2021, with an accelerated departure rate (75 percent higher) in the last three years ⦠coinciding with the launch of the China Initiative in 2018,â the authors wrote.
The Justice Department, which didnât comment for this story, ended the initiative in early 2022. The authors wrote that there are questions over how much âthe formal dropping of the âChina Initiativeâ name has been accompanied by substantive changes in the governmentâs practices that address the chilling effects.â (...)
âPowerful countries collecting intelligence on other powerful countries (including their own allies) is a universal and banal feature of international relations, and it only becomes a danger to national security if the other country is a committed enemy,â said Jake Werner, who specializes in U.S.-China relations as a Research Fellow at the Quincy Institute. âChina is not today a U.S. enemy, but feverishly hyping supposed threats from China is driving a confrontational approach to U.S.âChina relations that risks turning China into such an enemy.â
Werner added, referring to the Times article, âtreating China as an enemy encourages the exaggeration of differences between the two countries and blindness to similarities.â
Exaggerating those differences and engaging in China threat-inflation is also good for business, whether that means selling more newspapers, getting reelected, giving more money to the defense industry, and getting funding directly from it. Indeed, any company involved in âthreat intelligence,â as Recorded Future apparently is, certainly has an interest in seeing that those threats exist, real or imagined.
not sure why the ccp would want to erase/hide this
blatant intentional censorship by the ccp obviously destroys trust and credibility
not a wise move on their/xi's part
Pretty awkward wording: "stop selling advanced microchip sales". Seems like it was written by a bot or a translator program. Then again, I'm not used to the Twitter-sphere - maybe a lot of tweets read like that.
as i understand it one of the wrinkles is that micron pulled out of an IPO three days before scheduled
someone in power probably felt slighted/upset so micron gets investigated
probably more nuanced than that
there are legit analyses/conversations regarding this and similar topics
the china power project is pretty good (listen/read here)
or paul triolo's work too (over at csis) he has a twitter account that pings some tech news as well
regards
Pretty awkward wording: "stop selling advanced microchip sales". Seems like it was written by a bot or a translator program. Then again, I'm not used to the Twitter-sphere - maybe a lot of tweets read like that.
Pretty awkward wording: "stop selling advanced microchip sales". Seems like it was written by a bot or a translator program. Then again, I'm not used to the Twitter-sphere - maybe a lot of tweets read like that.