Economix
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Apr 23, 2025 - 11:02pm
Wordle - daily game
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Apr 23, 2025 - 10:37pm
Trump
- kurtster - Apr 23, 2025 - 10:23pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Apr 23, 2025 - 10:00pm
Graphs, Charts & Maps
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 23, 2025 - 9:02pm
Musky Mythology
- islander - Apr 23, 2025 - 8:51pm
The Obituary Page
- ScottFromWyoming - Apr 23, 2025 - 7:49pm
NY Times Strands
- GeneP59 - Apr 23, 2025 - 7:30pm
NYTimes Connections
- GeneP59 - Apr 23, 2025 - 7:18pm
Radio Paradise Comments
- GeneP59 - Apr 23, 2025 - 7:15pm
Republican Party
- Red_Dragon - Apr 23, 2025 - 6:37pm
Mixtape Culture Club
- ColdMiser - Apr 23, 2025 - 5:39pm
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- winter - Apr 23, 2025 - 5:19pm
Artificial Intelligence
- R_P - Apr 23, 2025 - 5:01pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- dryan67 - Apr 23, 2025 - 3:58pm
Commercializing Facebook
- R_P - Apr 23, 2025 - 2:29pm
BRING OUT YOUR DEAD
- Isabeau - Apr 23, 2025 - 2:22pm
Business as Usual
- R_P - Apr 23, 2025 - 1:05pm
April 2025 Photo Theme - Red
- Antigone - Apr 23, 2025 - 11:16am
Vinyl Only Spin List
- Steely_D - Apr 23, 2025 - 9:38am
Radio Paradise Staion Break
- geoff_morphini - Apr 23, 2025 - 8:16am
Today in History
- Red_Dragon - Apr 23, 2025 - 8:09am
Geeky funny
- Proclivities - Apr 23, 2025 - 7:42am
Hockey + Fantasy Hockey
- dischuckin - Apr 23, 2025 - 7:13am
Things You Thought Today
- ScottFromWyoming - Apr 22, 2025 - 9:45pm
Real Time with Bill Maher
- R_P - Apr 22, 2025 - 1:51pm
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- Lazy8 - Apr 22, 2025 - 12:27pm
Happy Earth Day
- R_P - Apr 22, 2025 - 12:26pm
Tesla (motors, batteries, etc)
- islander - Apr 22, 2025 - 10:03am
Thimerosal Vaccines linked to neurological disorders
- islander - Apr 21, 2025 - 8:48pm
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote')
- JimTreadwell - Apr 21, 2025 - 4:23pm
Israel
- R_P - Apr 21, 2025 - 3:46pm
M.A.G.A.
- Proclivities - Apr 21, 2025 - 12:17pm
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing
- GeneP59 - Apr 21, 2025 - 8:40am
Freedom of speech?
- rgio - Apr 21, 2025 - 4:43am
Name My Band
- GeneP59 - Apr 20, 2025 - 7:45pm
::yesterday::
- Red_Dragon - Apr 20, 2025 - 3:35pm
Poetry Forum
- oldviolin - Apr 20, 2025 - 8:43am
Favourite Scriptures
- black321 - Apr 20, 2025 - 8:30am
Museum Of Bad Album Covers
- Proclivities - Apr 20, 2025 - 7:55am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Apr 19, 2025 - 10:23pm
YouTube: Music-Videos
- oldviolin - Apr 19, 2025 - 10:14pm
Song of the Day
- oldviolin - Apr 19, 2025 - 8:53pm
I Thought Earth Had Only One Moon
- Red_Dragon - Apr 19, 2025 - 5:06pm
The war on funk is over!
- R_P - Apr 19, 2025 - 4:02pm
China
- R_P - Apr 19, 2025 - 1:57pm
Other Medical Stuff
- kurtster - Apr 19, 2025 - 1:43pm
Quick! I need a chicken...
- Isabeau - Apr 19, 2025 - 1:00pm
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously
- R_P - Apr 19, 2025 - 12:45pm
Best Song Comments.
- ScottFromWyoming - Apr 19, 2025 - 11:15am
Outstanding Covers
- oldviolin - Apr 19, 2025 - 9:59am
Mars
- oldviolin - Apr 19, 2025 - 9:53am
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone
- oldviolin - Apr 19, 2025 - 9:32am
Live Music
- Steely_D - Apr 19, 2025 - 7:30am
Immigration
- R_P - Apr 18, 2025 - 7:05pm
Dialing 1-800-Manbird
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2025 - 6:43pm
Need A Thread Killed?
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2025 - 6:25pm
Music Videos
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2025 - 5:19pm
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests
- Antigone - Apr 18, 2025 - 3:04pm
Fascism In America
- RedTopFireBelow - Apr 18, 2025 - 3:01pm
New Music
- black321 - Apr 18, 2025 - 1:24pm
Comics!
- Steely_D - Apr 18, 2025 - 11:04am
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see
- Steely_D - Apr 18, 2025 - 10:49am
One Partying State - Wyoming News
- ScottFromWyoming - Apr 18, 2025 - 8:58am
How's the weather?
- GeneP59 - Apr 18, 2025 - 8:40am
Breaking News
- Red_Dragon - Apr 18, 2025 - 6:07am
NASA & other news from space
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Apr 18, 2025 - 12:36am
Ask an Atheist
- Lazy8 - Apr 17, 2025 - 9:12pm
Sorry Bill/Alanna
- powdapilot - Apr 17, 2025 - 5:10pm
Strips, cartoons, illustrations
- Red_Dragon - Apr 17, 2025 - 3:37pm
Cinema
- R_P - Apr 17, 2025 - 2:53pm
Words that should be put on the substitutes bench for a year
- Proclivities - Apr 17, 2025 - 1:44pm
Ukraine
- R_P - Apr 17, 2025 - 12:01pm
Things that are just WRONG
- GeneP59 - Apr 17, 2025 - 11:08am
the Todd Rundgren topic
- Steely_D - Apr 17, 2025 - 10:43am
|
Index »
Regional/Local »
Europe »
Ukraine
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 114, 115, 116 ... 121, 122, 123 Next |
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 18, 2014 - 11:03am |
|
steeler wrote: Your post yesterday was at 12:07 p.m. ( PDT or 3:07 pm EDT ) This is what you said about Obama's initial statement (and all you said about Obama, period, in that post):
Obama has stated that finding out if any Americans on board was his first priority, while stating that this "may be a tragedy". Funny (not) how Obama is unsure that shooting down a commercial airliner is a tragedy . By any objective assessment, this is a gratuitous slap at Obama. The suggestion that he would find the shooting down of a commercial airliner resulting in 298 deaths not to be a tragedy is absurd.
Yes, a big slap at Obama, and an indictment regarding his handling of foreign affairs to date. You seem to be blinded by your particular ideology on this matter. Obama is allowing an invasion on our southern border. He does not deserve respect anymore. His office does, but he has forsaken any obligation towards any personal respect, imo. I don't live in your politically correct world, nor wish to. The emperor has no clothes, get over it.
|
|
steeler

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth 
|
Posted:
Jul 18, 2014 - 9:08am |
|
kurtster wrote: Just one minute please.
I never once said this was a deliberate attack on a commercial airliner. Please backscroll and show where I said this was deliberate. Plus, I have yet to see any mention that the Ukrainian government or anyone else for that matter, thinks that a commercial airliner was deliberately targeted.
I agree with you that this was an unfortunate accident and most likely the result of piss poor planning and incompetence. Maybe the missile crew was drunk, who knows ? I don't. To deliberately attack a commercial airliner is an act of terror and not good for those seeking sympathy for their cause. This event is a lot of things rolled into one, but I have yet to conclude that it was anything more than the assholes manning the missiles thought that they had a military flight in their sights and were not skilled enough to verify their target before firing.
I stand behind everything that I have so far posted on this event.
Edit: My "joke" as you term it was anything but. It was an indictment against Obama. Once again, Obama chose to vote "present" on a matter that matters, rather than take a stand and commit himself to anything.
Your post yesterday was at 12:07 p.m. This is what you said about Obama's initial statement (and all you said about Obama, period, in that post): Obama has stated that finding out if any Americans on board was his first priority, while stating that this "may be a tragedy".Funny (not) how Obama is unsure that shooting down a commercial airliner is a tragedy . By any objective assessment, this is a gratuitous slap at Obama. The suggestion that he would find the shooting down of a commercial airliner resulting in 298 deaths not to be a tragedy is absurd.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 18, 2014 - 7:07am |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote: Driving home yesterday and listening to NPR, their reporter on the scene was being asked his opinion by the in-studio news host and the reporter (Noah Sneider?) seemed to be saying that there's no way this plane was singled out, and that there's no way any party on the ground would target a commercial airliner deliberately. The most likely scenario, he seemed to be saying, was simple incompetence. It takes more than one person to operate that missile system: one or more to locate incoming aircraft, a commander to give the order, and the missile itself has onboard systems that report back status such as signals received from the target aircraft. Apparently several systems that might have prevented this were available but obviously they failed or were ignored/misunderstood.
I was driving and making stops, in/out of the car so I apologize for the spotty summary, but like Kurt, I feel able to flesh out my own theories. Unlike Kurt (and the leadership of Ukraine), I am not able to immediately declare this to be a deliberate machination of Russia or the separatists. I do think the airline (and all the others) who didn't think changing their routes was necessary deserves a solid drubbing in the media. When we get on an airplane, we have no control of its route and we implicitly trust that we will not fly over active war zones, don't we? And Kurt: May/Might, that's not what anyone cares about. Your tone-deaf Obama "joke" before the wreckage was even cool is what set people off. But why should anyone expect you to understand that when you learned everything you need to know about class and good taste from Rush?
Just one minute please. I never once said this was a deliberate attack on a commercial airliner. Please backscroll and show where I said this was deliberate. Plus, I have yet to see any mention that the Ukrainian government or anyone else for that matter, thinks that a commercial airliner was deliberately targeted. I agree with you that this was an unfortunate accident and most likely the result of piss poor planning and incompetence. Maybe the missile crew was drunk, who knows ? I don't. To deliberately attack a commercial airliner is an act of terror and not good for those seeking sympathy for their cause. This event is a lot of things rolled into one, but I have yet to conclude that it was anything more than the assholes manning the missiles thought that they had a military flight in their sights and were not skilled enough to verify their target before firing. I stand behind everything that I have so far posted on this event. Edit: My "joke" as you term it was anything but. It was an indictment against Obama. Once again, Obama chose to vote "present" on a matter that matters, rather than take a stand and commit himself to anything.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming

Location: Powell Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 18, 2014 - 7:06am |
|
kurtster wrote:I think this parallels more with yesterday than the event you linked to. Of course you do. All of them seem to be the result of on-the-ground commanders being incompetent or otherwise unable to think rationally about what it is they're doing. A brief glance at some of these shows little or no indication of intent by any government and over-reaching by pilots or local command.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming

Location: Powell Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 18, 2014 - 6:45am |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote: Sounds to me like someone stuffed up big time. Awful.
Driving home yesterday and listening to NPR, their reporter on the scene was being asked his opinion by the in-studio news host and the reporter (Noah Sneider?) seemed to be saying that there's no way this plane was singled out, and that there's no way any party on the ground would target a commercial airliner deliberately. The most likely scenario, he seemed to be saying, was simple incompetence. It takes more than one person to operate that missile system: one or more to locate incoming aircraft, a commander to give the order, and the missile itself has onboard systems that report back status such as signals received from the target aircraft. Apparently several systems that might have prevented this were available but obviously they failed or were ignored/misunderstood. I was driving and making stops, in/out of the car so I apologize for the spotty summary, but like Kurt, I feel able to flesh out my own theories. Unlike Kurt (and the leadership of Ukraine), I am not able to immediately declare this to be a deliberate machination of Russia or the separatists. I do think the airline (and all the others) who didn't think changing their routes was necessary deserves a solid drubbing in the media. When we get on an airplane, we have no control of its route and we implicitly trust that we will not fly over active war zones, don't we? And Kurt: May/Might, that's not what anyone cares about. Your tone-deaf Obama "joke" before the wreckage was even cool is what set people off. But why should anyone expect you to understand that when you learned everything you need to know about class and good taste from Rush?
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 18, 2014 - 6:37am |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote: Yep, that was mentioned in the coverage I watched. So was this ... I think this parallels more with yesterday than the event you linked to. Make no mistake, all are indeed terrible events. Obama's reaction will be measured against Reagan's reaction.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 18, 2014 - 4:25am |
|
steeler wrote: I have been thinking about that from soon after I heard about the Malaysian airliner being shot down. Interesting to see which parallels are being drawn — and which are not being drawn.
Sounds to me like someone stuffed up big time. Awful.
|
|
steeler

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth 
|
Posted:
Jul 18, 2014 - 3:04am |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote: I have been thinking about that from soon after I heard about the Malaysian airliner being shot down. Interesting to see which parallels are being drawn — and which are not being drawn.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 17, 2014 - 11:34pm |
|
kurtster wrote: I did so because of what is going to be a direct confrontation with Russia over this This is going straight to Putin. It was his missile that brought the plane down. Either the Russians pushed the button or the separatists did, but its still Putin's missile. My money as I already said is on the rebels pushing the button. I think that we can safely eliminate the Ukraine gov itsekf, because who would they be shooting at ? The rebels don't have jets that fly at 30k feet.
Obama will have to deal with Putin on this, no matter what. I have little faith in Obama standing up and looking Putin in the eye on this, based upon Obama's performance in foreign policy so far. Obama by his comments and lack of anything further than the two sentences he uttered so far is showing his fear of dealing with Putin. Obama's red lines mean absolutely nothing. His words mean nothing. He has zero cred internationally. He's cut Israel loose and left them to defend and decide for themselves. Israel has zero confidence in Obama.
Part of participating in the poly threads is commenting on things as they happen and drawing conclusions. I want to see if I'm reading things right before the spin and talking points starts. One cannot trust their sources implicitly. This is not about a set up for an I told you so down the road. It about feeling sure enough about things based upon personal observations and the willingness to put them out as correct, not misinforming or deliberately misleading or biased.
I don't know how Obama is going to deal with this. However, my money is on him hoping to sweep it under the rug and avoid a scene with Putin. It will be investigated like everything else and the investigation will last indefinitely providing an out for having to comment on it and go on the record with anything, because its an ongoing investigation and I cannot comment about it until the never ending investigation is over.
And if I wait to offer a comment after things become "official", then I'm just parroting some partisan pundit. I try to speak for myself and avoid copy / paste as much as possible.
hmm...
|
|
islander

Location: West coast somewhere Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 17, 2014 - 9:55pm |
|
Red_Dragon wrote:wow. just wow. forgive me, SFW
|
|
Red_Dragon

Location: Gilead 
|
Posted:
Jul 17, 2014 - 8:51pm |
|
wow. just wow.
forgive me, SFW
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 17, 2014 - 8:48pm |
|
ScottN wrote:kurtster wrote:.... I drew a conclusion based upon the facts that I saw presented. I didn't shoot from the hip. .... You had no way of knowing what the facts actually were when you posted this morning. I criticized your early conclusion and the early/quick assumptions leading to it. As I scan news reporting now, there is some difference on what constitutes facts (of responsibility) even now, in the evening.Of course you're not sorry you find fault in everything Obama does, and then say so. To walk any of that back now, well... My first post on this wasn't this morning. The jet was shot down in the morning. I knew about it within the first hour it was shot down. I took a nap at about 11 am and woke up at 1 pm to find the markets going nuts. I didn't post until after 3 pm this afternoon, at least 4 hours after the plane was shot down. I paid close attention to the news from 1 pm til the time I posted, watching the markets go nuts reacting in the process. My current endeavors are extremely geopolitically sensitive. I'm not watching this through a political or emotional filter. I need to figure things out, ASAP and correctly. I trusted my sources. I was sure enough to say so. I was right about a missile. I said it was either the rebels or the Russians themselves that launched it, with my money on the rebels. Obama, meh ... he's just the sad sideshow that enables all the crazy people in the world to do as they wish in the leadership vacuum he has created, because it is too well known that he will do nothing of substance other than screw the citizens he governs. The only threat he poses is to Americans, not the rest of the world. He can't even stop an invasion of our country. He is useless and worthless as a president. The markets are already settling down, reflecting a confidence that Obama will do nothing about today's tragedy. Even Gaza isn't affecting the markets much. By the middle of next week, the only one's who will be still talking about it will be the Republicans and Fox News. Everyone else will have moved along, just as Obama already has. He didn't cancel his two fundraisers tonight. Every time there is a tragedy, he goes to fundraisers. That's how Obama gets over tragedies. That's what he did the day after Benghazi and so many others. I saw the list this afternoon. Its an obscenely shameless pattern of behaviour. Party on Garth ! Party on Barrack ! Goodnight ...
|
|
ScottN

Location: Half inch above the K/T boundary Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 17, 2014 - 7:36pm |
|
kurtster wrote:.... I drew a conclusion based upon the facts that I saw presented. I didn't shoot from the hip. .... You had no way of knowing what the facts actually were when you posted this morning. I criticized your early conclusion and the early/quick assumptions leading to it. As I scan news reporting now, there is some difference on what constitutes facts (of responsibility) even now, in the evening. Of course you're not sorry you find fault in everything Obama does, and then say so. To walk any of that back now, well...
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 17, 2014 - 7:15pm |
|
kurtster wrote:ScottFromWyoming wrote: Context: "Obviously, the world is watching reports of a downed passenger jet near the Russia/Ukraine border, and it looks like it might be a terrible tragedy..." He's saying it "might be" a tragedy because he's not confirming the news, only mentioning it. He could have added some more words like "if the reports are accurate, it is a terrible tragedy" but he didn't need to. Only people who take snippets of speeches and see how they can be manipulated (and those who see/hear the manipulated result) got his meaning wrong.
FWIW, I saw Obama speak live. Because I substituted may for might and omittedterrible makes me substantively wrong, eh ? I was working from my memory of the live event.Once again, I am totally wrong about everything I commented on due to technicalities. I guess that I owe the community an apology for illegal use of quotation marks with the intent to mislead and deceive. So y'all can debate grammar and I'll pay attention to the more important parts of all of this. I just saw a tape of his speech again ... Obama said the word MAY not MIGHT. I was correct. The only thing I did wrong was omit the word terrible. I even rewound it to make sure. So you got it wrong, not me. You need to check the sources you quoted.
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 17, 2014 - 6:31pm |
|
kurtster wrote:My cat's name is Tobin.  I am not a neocon nor is my cat. I'll take your word for the cat. Perhaps you just happen to walk and quack like one...
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 17, 2014 - 6:30pm |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote: What you said that is appalling is kurtster wrote:Funny (not) how Obama is unsure that shooting down a commercial airliner is a tragedy. Which several people pointed to as being out of line (although not out of character for you) and you refuse to address it. That you came to this conclusion yourself is not something to be especially proud of; I gave you the benefit of the doubt that you'd only heard an edit of the speech that had been pre-spun for your consumption, but you actually did it all by your lonesome and somehow thought you'd be given a pass. A) it is unseemly, at best, to be taking a dig at our president for simply making a statement, phrased very carefully so as not to cause further unrest. B) If your takeaway was, in fact, that he was unsure—it's a revealing insight into your (in)ability to listen with anything approaching an open mind. Ya, I came up with it all by my lonesome. I have no remorse. I meant it. I will have the most transparent administration ever ... You can keep you doctor ... The Cambridge Police acted stupidly ... It was because of a video ... There isn't a smidgen of corruption at the IRS ... I learned about it first from news reports ... Tell Vlad that I can be more flexible after the election ... This is a red line and if crossed I will act ... The border is secure ... How much crap am I supposed to swallow ? Sorry, I'm not sorry.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 17, 2014 - 6:11pm |
|
RichardPrins wrote: This appeared in Commentary — the bible of the neoconservatives — and was written by its editor, Jonathan S. Tobin. Tobin, although not well known, is a leading voice in the "Israel can do no wrong" chorus.
The policy (along with the State Dept. noise) hasn't changed much since then. Maybe nothing but a full-on invasion of U.S. troops into Gaza could satisfy some warmongers... My cat's name is Tobin.  I am not a neocon nor is my cat.
|
|
Red_Dragon

Location: Gilead 
|
Posted:
Jul 17, 2014 - 6:10pm |
|
THANKS OBAMA!
|
|
ScottFromWyoming

Location: Powell Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 17, 2014 - 6:07pm |
|
kurtster wrote: I did so because of what is going to be a direct confrontation with Russia over this This is going straight to Putin. It was his missile that brought the plane down. Either the Russians pushed the button or the separatists did, but its still Putin's missile. My money as I already said is on the rebels pushing the button. I think that we can safely eliminate the Ukraine gov itsekf, because who would they be shooting at ? The rebels don't have jets that fly at 30k feet.
Obama will have to deal with Putin on this, no matter what. I have little faith in Obama standing up and looking Putin in the eye on this, based upon Obama's performance in foreign policy so far. Obama by his comments and lack of anything further than the two sentences he uttered so far is showing his fear of dealing with Putin. Obama's red lines mean absolutely nothing. His words mean nothing. He has zero cred internationally. He's cut Israel loose and left them to defend and decide for themselves. Israel has zero confidence in Obama.
Part of participating in the poly threads is commenting on things as they happen and drawing conclusions. I want to see if I'm reading things right before the spin and talking points starts. One cannot trust their sources implicitly. This is not about a set up for an I told you so down the road. It about feeling sure enough about things based upon personal observations and the willingness to put them out as correct, not misinforming or deliberately misleading or biased.
I don't know how Obama is going to deal with this. However, my money is on him hoping to sweep it under the rug and avoid a scene with Putin. It will be investigated like everything else and the investigation will last indefinitely providing an out for having to comment on it and go on the record with anything, because its an ongoing investigation and I cannot comment about it until the never ending investigation is over.
And if I wait to offer a comment after things become "official", then I'm just parroting some partisan pundit. I try to speak for myself and avoid copy / paste as much as possible.
Let's just say all this is true. Okay. I'm not challenging you on any of your prognostications; we're all entitled to think out loud. What you said that is appalling is kurtster wrote:Funny (not) how Obama is unsure that shooting down a commercial airliner is a tragedy. Which several people pointed to as being out of line (although not out of character for you) and you refuse to address it. That you came to this conclusion yourself is not something to be especially proud of; I gave you the benefit of the doubt that you'd only heard an edit of the speech that had been pre-spun for your consumption, but you actually did it all by your lonesome and somehow thought you'd be given a pass. A) it is unseemly, at best, to be taking a dig at our president for simply making a statement, phrased very carefully so as not to cause further unrest. B) If your takeaway was, in fact, that he was unsure—it's a revealing insight into your (in)ability to listen with anything approaching an open mind.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 17, 2014 - 6:03pm |
|
ScottN wrote:kurtster wrote:.......... And if I wait to offer a comment after things become "official", then I'm just parrotingsome partisan pundit. I try to speak for myself and avoid copy / paste as much as possible. CNN a partisan pundit? You opined on this before the wreckage had stopped burning.You may or not be right on whatever conclusion you draw. But you draw conclusions before facts are gathered, or even given a high degree of credibility. Why not wait a few hours and be more surely correct instead of looking like a shoot-from-the-hip foregone conclusion maker? But then it's your credibility at stake as a poster, so...Your shots at Obama are taken for granted. You are obviously free to express your very well known and repeated ad nauseam opinion. Why don't you reread what you responded to. And if I wait to offer a comment after things become "official", then I'm just parroting some partisan pundit.That wasn't directed at you or anyone else. It says, if I wait , then I'm ... It doesn't say ScottN or SFW or mutepoint, or steeler or anyone else. How you try and make this into a personal attack on yourself is beyond me. I drew a conclusion based upon the facts that I saw presented. I didn't shoot from the hip. If I had, then I would have been wrong, correct ? Why is it that one is not allowed to draw their own conclusions anymore ? More of the government knows what is best for you, because you aren't smart enough to know what's best for you or think for yourself ? I held back on my snark on Obama in my initial post. I did however answer steeler's question directly. I didn't mince words or evade the question. Credibility ? I assume that I have none in the first place. Doesn't my position on chem trails kill all of my cred before I get started ? Doesn't my support of the Tea Party kill all my cred, too ? Doesn't my position on illegal immigration kill my cred as well ? Oh and let's not forget my position on Global Warming. I am a convicted denier afterall ... Worst of all, I voted for Romney. Hell, I even worked for Romney during the election. The horror ! Long ago I decided that I wasn't going to wait for someone to say "Duck" for when the shit hits the fan. I'm doing my homework so that I will have a clue before it happens.
|
|
|