Thimerosal Vaccines linked to neurological disorders
- Steely_D - Apr 21, 2025 - 7:33pm
Today in History
- R_P - Apr 21, 2025 - 7:10pm
NYTimes Connections
- geoff_morphini - Apr 21, 2025 - 6:27pm
Musky Mythology
- Lazy8 - Apr 21, 2025 - 5:34pm
Mixtape Culture Club
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 21, 2025 - 5:31pm
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote')
- JimTreadwell - Apr 21, 2025 - 4:23pm
Israel
- R_P - Apr 21, 2025 - 3:46pm
NY Times Strands
- rgio - Apr 21, 2025 - 3:27pm
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- winter - Apr 21, 2025 - 3:23pm
Trump
- Steely_D - Apr 21, 2025 - 2:37pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- jarro - Apr 21, 2025 - 2:27pm
Real Time with Bill Maher
- rgio - Apr 21, 2025 - 1:38pm
Wordle - daily game
- geoff_morphini - Apr 21, 2025 - 1:25pm
The Obituary Page
- rgio - Apr 21, 2025 - 12:24pm
April 2025 Photo Theme - Red
- Alchemist - Apr 21, 2025 - 12:21pm
M.A.G.A.
- Proclivities - Apr 21, 2025 - 12:17pm
Radio Paradise Comments
- GeneP59 - Apr 21, 2025 - 8:41am
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing
- GeneP59 - Apr 21, 2025 - 8:40am
Freedom of speech?
- rgio - Apr 21, 2025 - 4:43am
Name My Band
- GeneP59 - Apr 20, 2025 - 7:45pm
::yesterday::
- Red_Dragon - Apr 20, 2025 - 3:35pm
Things You Thought Today
- maryte - Apr 20, 2025 - 2:03pm
Poetry Forum
- oldviolin - Apr 20, 2025 - 8:43am
Favourite Scriptures
- black321 - Apr 20, 2025 - 8:30am
Museum Of Bad Album Covers
- Proclivities - Apr 20, 2025 - 7:55am
Radio Paradise Staion Break
- walterebaugh - Apr 20, 2025 - 7:33am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Apr 19, 2025 - 10:23pm
YouTube: Music-Videos
- oldviolin - Apr 19, 2025 - 10:14pm
Song of the Day
- oldviolin - Apr 19, 2025 - 8:53pm
I Thought Earth Had Only One Moon
- Red_Dragon - Apr 19, 2025 - 5:06pm
The war on funk is over!
- R_P - Apr 19, 2025 - 4:02pm
China
- R_P - Apr 19, 2025 - 1:57pm
Other Medical Stuff
- kurtster - Apr 19, 2025 - 1:43pm
Quick! I need a chicken...
- Isabeau - Apr 19, 2025 - 1:00pm
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously
- R_P - Apr 19, 2025 - 12:45pm
Republican Party
- Red_Dragon - Apr 19, 2025 - 11:40am
Best Song Comments.
- ScottFromWyoming - Apr 19, 2025 - 11:15am
Outstanding Covers
- oldviolin - Apr 19, 2025 - 9:59am
Mars
- oldviolin - Apr 19, 2025 - 9:53am
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone
- oldviolin - Apr 19, 2025 - 9:32am
Live Music
- Steely_D - Apr 19, 2025 - 7:30am
Immigration
- R_P - Apr 18, 2025 - 7:05pm
Dialing 1-800-Manbird
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2025 - 6:43pm
Need A Thread Killed?
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2025 - 6:25pm
BRING OUT YOUR DEAD
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2025 - 5:55pm
Music Videos
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2025 - 5:19pm
Commercializing Facebook
- R_P - Apr 18, 2025 - 4:49pm
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests
- Antigone - Apr 18, 2025 - 3:04pm
Fascism In America
- RedTopFireBelow - Apr 18, 2025 - 3:01pm
New Music
- black321 - Apr 18, 2025 - 1:24pm
Comics!
- Steely_D - Apr 18, 2025 - 11:04am
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see
- Steely_D - Apr 18, 2025 - 10:49am
One Partying State - Wyoming News
- ScottFromWyoming - Apr 18, 2025 - 8:58am
How's the weather?
- GeneP59 - Apr 18, 2025 - 8:40am
Breaking News
- Red_Dragon - Apr 18, 2025 - 6:07am
NASA & other news from space
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Apr 18, 2025 - 12:36am
Ask an Atheist
- Lazy8 - Apr 17, 2025 - 9:12pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Apr 17, 2025 - 8:22pm
Sorry Bill/Alanna
- powdapilot - Apr 17, 2025 - 5:10pm
Strips, cartoons, illustrations
- Red_Dragon - Apr 17, 2025 - 3:37pm
Cinema
- R_P - Apr 17, 2025 - 2:53pm
Words that should be put on the substitutes bench for a year
- Proclivities - Apr 17, 2025 - 1:44pm
Ukraine
- R_P - Apr 17, 2025 - 12:01pm
Things that are just WRONG
- GeneP59 - Apr 17, 2025 - 11:08am
the Todd Rundgren topic
- Steely_D - Apr 17, 2025 - 10:43am
Simpler Times????
- folkes.tom - Apr 17, 2025 - 6:46am
Little known information... maybe even facts
- Coaxial - Apr 17, 2025 - 5:47am
Philly
- Proclivities - Apr 17, 2025 - 4:47am
Flower Pictures
- MrDill - Apr 17, 2025 - 4:43am
Economix
- Lazy8 - Apr 16, 2025 - 8:48pm
Bad Poetry
- oldviolin - Apr 16, 2025 - 8:46pm
Canada
- R_P - Apr 16, 2025 - 6:19pm
Skeptix
- R_P - Apr 16, 2025 - 7:13am
NY Times Spelling Bee
- Proclivities - Apr 16, 2025 - 6:53am
News of the Weird
- GeneP59 - Apr 15, 2025 - 4:44pm
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
Trump
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 1149, 1150, 1151 ... 1299, 1300, 1301 Next |
haresfur

Location: The Golden Triangle Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 30, 2016 - 3:52pm |
|
kurtster wrote: Exactly. Trump ran on a non interventionist foreign policy. Something we haven't seen since Monroe. One reason I supported him.
The US had non-interventionist foreign policies for the first halves of WWI and WWII. I won't say much about the first, but the second was despicable.
|
|
haresfur

Location: The Golden Triangle Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 30, 2016 - 3:47pm |
|
kcar wrote: snip...
The Soviet Union is not reconstituted nor will it likely ever be even partially. Russia revived in the aughts mostly due to the rising price of oil and its hydrocarbon reserves. Outside of the petrochemical sector it does not have a robust economy, hence its struggles with falling oil and gas prices.
Russia has defended its traditional territorial interests with interventions in Georgia, Ukraine and Syria (a longtime client state and home to a strategic Russian naval base in Tartus), but it has nowhere near the military might of the former USSR. The People's Republic of China is a far, far greater economic and military power.
... snip
The Soviet Union is being partially reconstituted exactly as you say, under the guise of "traditional territorial interests". If you consider effectively taking over half of Ukraine as merely defending traditional interests, then you are saying the traditional interests are the SU.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 30, 2016 - 3:10pm |
|
kurtster wrote: Exactly. Trump ran on a non interventionist foreign policy. Something we haven't seen since Monroe. One reason I supported him.
To everyone else ... To those who say Trump has no clue regarding foreign policy ... Just exactly how much experience did the present occupant of the WH have going in ? Was he conducting business in 20 countries prior to taking office ? Just how many countries did he visit as an adult before taking office ? For that matter, just what experience did he have going in in anything that qualified him for POTUS more than Trump ? What did Obama run or operate ?
So we (the USA) are going to throw the Baltic States under the bus and give them back to Russia ? Says who ? And just why is it the responsibility of the USA (only) ? Can't the EU defend itself without the help of again, the USA ? If so why not ?
Its time that everyone starts pulling their own weight. The USA spent the entire 20th Century saving the world from itself and what have we got in return ? Hate is all.
The NWO and all the Globalists can go eff themselves.
Ya know, I addressed everyone's thoughts expressed below regarding Trump's potential foreign policy and not one response was directed at that. Not one. Instead its a complete redirect to something different. I'll be happy to share my thoughts regarding those redirects, if my thoughts above are responded to.
|
|
steeler

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth 
|
Posted:
Nov 30, 2016 - 12:32pm |
|
Here is the thing about the whole "drain the swamp" promise and other promises like that: They are born out of a need to vilify those in power with whom you have policy differences (or, in some cases, to vilify those who are contending for the office or power you are seeking, even when there might not be significant policy differences). It is not enough to attack an opponent's policies. So, you have the recurring theme (from this year's campaign especially) of being someone who is not part of the "establishment." Someone who will "fix" what is wrong in Washington, D.C., and stand up to the Washington, D.C. "cartel." Some billionaires are not part of the establishment. Some incumbent Senators are not part of the establishment. Some members of the media are part of the establishment, but others are not Trump is not alone in making these types of claims, but he did up the ante on using vilification as a campaign strategy. Candidates for all kinds of offices are no longer just not the best choice, they actually are evil devils who need to be locked up. This is all smoke and mirrors. Us against Them stuff. And it works.
|
|
Steely_D

Location: The foot of Mount Belzoni Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 30, 2016 - 10:32am |
|
islander wrote: I'm not sure which is more ridiculous, the shifting rationales, or the outright denial. Of course, given the candidate, neither is really surprising.
I think that's it. The idea that someone can be completely untested, caught in documentable severe contradictions or episodes of flagrant ignorance, be morally suspect (including being tone deaf to incest), and then beginning his term by picking the same people he'd vilified... Then I have to stop and sincerely ask myself: The folks at FOX and other alt-right sites frothed mightily and incessantly about how Obama was this or that. And from my perspective they were so totally confabulating and caught up their own echo chamber. It was pathetic. And now, the folks talking about Trump are using the same emotive dismay and anger. But...this time it's legit, isn't it?
|
|
Red_Dragon

Location: Gilead 
|
Posted:
Nov 30, 2016 - 10:09am |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote: I had a couple of Cuba Libres last night and will probably repeat the process tonight. ¡Viva!
|
|
ScottFromWyoming

Location: Powell Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 30, 2016 - 10:02am |
|
Red_Dragon wrote: I had a couple of Cuba Libres last night and will probably repeat the process tonight. ¡Viva!
|
|
Red_Dragon

Location: Gilead 
|
Posted:
Nov 30, 2016 - 9:52am |
|
|
|
islander

Location: West coast somewhere Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 30, 2016 - 7:51am |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote: kurtster wrote: Exactly. Trump ran on a non interventionist foreign policy. Something we haven't seen since Monroe. One reason I supported him.
To everyone else ... To those who say Trump has no clue regarding foreign policy ... Just exactly how much experience did the present occupant of the WH have going in ? Was he conducting business in 20 countries prior to taking office ? Just how many countries did he visit as an adult before taking office ? For that matter, just what experience did he have going in in anything that qualified him for POTUS more than Trump ? What did Obama run or operate ?
So we (the USA) are going to throw the Baltic States under the bus and give them back to Russia ? Says who ? And just why is it the responsibility of the USA (only) ? Can't the EU defend itself without the help of again, the USA ? If so why not ?
Its time that everyone starts pulling their own weight. The USA spent the entire 20th Century saving the world from itself and what have we got in return ? Hate is all.
The NWO and all the Globalists can go eff themselves.
Aren't you the guy who thought trump was going to drain the swamp? your feet kindly ask you to put away the gun. I'm not sure which is more ridiculous, the shifting rationales, or the outright denial. Of course, given the candidate, neither is really surprising.
|
|
aflanigan

Location: At Sea Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 30, 2016 - 7:45am |
|
|
|
Red_Dragon

Location: Gilead 
|
Posted:
Nov 30, 2016 - 6:15am |
|
|
|
Red_Dragon

Location: Gilead 
|
Posted:
Nov 30, 2016 - 6:13am |
|
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 30, 2016 - 5:54am |
|
kurtster wrote: Exactly. Trump ran on a non interventionist foreign policy. Something we haven't seen since Monroe. One reason I supported him.
To everyone else ... To those who say Trump has no clue regarding foreign policy ... Just exactly how much experience did the present occupant of the WH have going in ? Was he conducting business in 20 countries prior to taking office ? Just how many countries did he visit as an adult before taking office ? For that matter, just what experience did he have going in in anything that qualified him for POTUS more than Trump ? What did Obama run or operate ?
So we (the USA) are going to throw the Baltic States under the bus and give them back to Russia ? Says who ? And just why is it the responsibility of the USA (only) ? Can't the EU defend itself without the help of again, the USA ? If so why not ?
Its time that everyone starts pulling their own weight. The USA spent the entire 20th Century saving the world from itself and what have we got in return ? Hate is all.
The NWO and all the Globalists can go eff themselves.
Aren't you the guy who thought trump was going to drain the swamp? your feet kindly ask you to put away the gun.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 30, 2016 - 5:39am |
|
sirdroseph wrote:If Russia was doing exactly what the US has been doing so close to our borders, we would have none of it. Remember the Cuban missile crisis? We just need to quit meddling in the worlds affairs. Screw NATO
Exactly. Trump ran on a non interventionist foreign policy. Something we haven't seen since Monroe. One reason I supported him. To everyone else ... To those who say Trump has no clue regarding foreign policy ... Just exactly how much experience did the present occupant of the WH have going in ? Was he conducting business in 20 countries prior to taking office ? Just how many countries did he visit as an adult before taking office ? For that matter, just what experience did he have going in in anything that qualified him for POTUS more than Trump ? What did Obama run or operate ? So we (the USA) are going to throw the Baltic States under the bus and give them back to Russia ? Says who ? And just why is it the responsibility of the USA (only) ? Can't the EU defend itself without the help of again, the USA ? If so why not ? Its time that everyone starts pulling their own weight. The USA spent the entire 20th Century saving the world from itself and what have we got in return ? Hate is all. The NWO and all the Globalists can go eff themselves.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 30, 2016 - 4:57am |
|
sirdroseph wrote: If Russia was doing exactly what the US has been doing so close to our borders, we would have none of it. Remember the Cuban missile crisis? We just need to quit meddling in the worlds affairs. Screw NATO
absolutely no comparison. Russia now wants to be part of the global marketplace so it should respect international rules. Back then you had two completely different systems that were antagonistic and fighting for world hegemony.
|
|
sirdroseph

Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 30, 2016 - 4:53am |
|
 kcar wrote: Are you trying to snark at Bush I, Clinton, Bush II and Obama with that comment? It may not really matter because either in terms of past events or future possibilities, your statement doesn't apply to reality.Â
The Soviet Union is not reconstituted nor will it likely ever be even partially. Russia revived in the aughts mostly due to the rising price of oil and its hydrocarbon reserves. Outside of the petrochemical sector it does not have a robust economy, hence its struggles with falling oil and gas prices. Â
Russia has defended its traditional territorial interests with interventions in Georgia, Ukraine and Syria (a longtime client state and home to a strategic Russian naval base in Tartus), but it has nowhere near the military might of the former USSR. The People's Republic of China is a far, far greater economic and military power. Â
And if you blame the US for the decline of NATO, you'd be better off looking at the lack of contribution and cooperation from its European member states. As for the "renewed arms race" bit...what are you basing that on?
But here: let's turn the tables on you, Scott. Do you seriously think Trump has the background knowledge, advisors or detailed policy to counter any increase in Russia's influence over Europe? Beyond making noises about forcing European partners to contribute to NATO, what are Trump's plans for the organization? Is Trump seriously going to hang Estonia out to dry as he suggested in his campaign comments?
Hope you don't mind waiting for answers to those questions from the incoming administration because right now Trump has no f#$^ing clue. This emperor doesn't even have a loincloth when it comes to foreign policy. Â
Â
If Russia was doing exactly what the US has been doing so close to our borders, we would have none of it. Remember the Cuban missile crisis? We just need to quit meddling in the worlds affairs. Screw NATO
|
|
kcar


|
Posted:
Nov 29, 2016 - 9:52pm |
|
ScottN wrote: Howzabout the reconstitution of the Soviet Union in light of a weakened NATO, followed by a renewed arms race? Would that qualify?
Are you trying to snark at Bush I, Clinton, Bush II and Obama with that comment? It may not really matter because either in terms of past events or future possibilities, your statement doesn't apply to reality. The Soviet Union is not reconstituted nor will it likely ever be even partially. Russia revived in the aughts mostly due to the rising price of oil and its hydrocarbon reserves. Outside of the petrochemical sector it does not have a robust economy, hence its struggles with falling oil and gas prices. Russia has defended its traditional territorial interests with interventions in Georgia, Ukraine and Syria (a longtime client state and home to a strategic Russian naval base in Tartus), but it has nowhere near the military might of the former USSR. The People's Republic of China is a far, far greater economic and military power. And if you blame the US for the decline of NATO, you'd be better off looking at the lack of contribution and cooperation from its European member states. As for the "renewed arms race" bit...what are you basing that on? But here: let's turn the tables on you, Scott. Do you seriously think Trump has the background knowledge, advisors or detailed policy to counter any increase in Russia's influence over Europe? Beyond making noises about forcing European partners to contribute to NATO, what are Trump's plans for the organization? Is Trump seriously going to hang Estonia out to dry as he suggested in his campaign comments? Hope you don't mind waiting for answers to those questions from the incoming administration because right now Trump has no f#$^ing clue. This emperor doesn't even have a loincloth when it comes to foreign policy.
|
|
ScottN

Location: Half inch above the K/T boundary Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 29, 2016 - 5:54pm |
|
kcar wrote: Trump talked a lot of smack.....
........ . We are still paying the price for their mistakes. Trump is so ignorant of international affairs and so lazy that we're bound to see another foreign policy disaster.
Howzabout the reconstitution of the Soviet Union in light of a weakened NATO, followed by a renewed arms race? Would that qualify?
|
|
kcar


|
Posted:
Nov 29, 2016 - 4:57pm |
|
islander wrote: What happened to "drain the swamp", and "change washington" and "he may not be the best, but I'm ready to blow things up" (that last one is a paraphrase of stuff you put out over the last year)? Do you not care now that "your guy" has won?
I can't wait to see what comes about this time next year or 2019, when you are realizing that you got played. You'll have more of the same - people in power enriching themselves while the little guy continues to get screwed. I'm sure you'll find a way to say you are better off, but in your heart you'll know that nothing really changed.
Trump talked a lot of smack about building a Wall and bringing jobs back, but I think some of the more outlandish promises were so much hot air. Trump figured out that he could say crazy, reckless things and not lose supporters. Kurtster also has a point: Trump hasn't been sworn in yet. He's already waffling on issues like adherence to environmental agreements. He may not be as disastrous as his campaign rhetoric indicated simply because he'll walk towards more moderate positions.
But I agree with you, islander. Trump's promises to areas hit by declines in the manufacturing and coal industries are not going to be kept. Presidents have a tough time protecting industries since governmental actions like tariffs don't work long-term and generally don't save that many jobs. Manufacturing and coal production have become much less labor-intensive due to market forces, not government regulations.
It also appears that Trump isn't interested in guarding against the influence of lobbyists and the prevalence of cronyism. The rich are definitely going to get richer. I'm sure we'll see a lot of flag-waving and fear-mongering to keep populist anger at bay.
I see the biggest risks from Trump flowing from his lack of preparedness and attention to detail. WaPo is reporting that he's already blown off many daily intelligence briefings. Dubya and his advisers refused to believe that Al Qaeda was a serious threat and allowed Islamic terrorists to kill Americans on US soil. Rather than secure Afghanistan, they invaded Iraq—a family-run dictatorship with no real attachment to Islamic fundamentalism or terrorism. We are still paying the price for their mistakes. Trump is so ignorant of international affairs and so lazy that we're bound to see another foreign policy disaster.
|
|
Red_Dragon

Location: Gilead 
|
Posted:
Nov 29, 2016 - 3:52pm |
|
|
|
|