kurtster wrote: 
OTOH:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/1669/general-mood-country.aspx

	Satisfied	Dissatisfied	No opinion
	%	%	%
2017 Jan 4-8	26	72	2
2016 Dec 7-11	27	71	2
2016 Nov 9-13	27	70	3
2016 Nov 1-6	37	62	1

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/direction_of_country-902.html

Poll	Date	Sample	Right Direction	Wrong Track	Spread
RCP Average	1/12 - 2/16	—	35.0	55.4	-20.4
Rasmussen Reports	2/12 - 2/16	2500 LV	46	48	-2
Reuters/Ipsos	2/10 - 2/14	1774 A	31	52	-21
Economist/YouGov	2/12 - 2/14	1100 RV	31	52	-21
IBD/TIPP	1/27 - 2/2	885 A	50	48	+2
CBS News	1/13 - 1/16	1257 A	29	61	-32
ABC News/Wash Post	1/12 - 1/15	1005 A	29	63	-34
NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl	1/12 - 1/15	1000 A	37	52	-15
Monmouth	1/12 - 1/15	708 RV	27	67	-40

 

 kurtster wrote: 
I am!  It's like Christmas everyday! That is an impressive report and very telling of where we were and where we're heading.

Anyone else sleeping better at night ?  I know I am ...  Best in nearly 8 years ...

 46% Say U.S. Heading in Right Direction

That’s up a point from the previous week. This is the fourth week in a row that this finding has been in the mid-40s after running in the mid- to upper 20s for much of 2016. The latest finding is higher that any week during the Obama presidency.

The complete list of all 80 false things Donald Trump has said in his first 4 weeks as president
The Star’s running tally of the bald-faced lies, exaggerations and deceptions the president of the United States of America has said, so far.

 ScottFromWyoming wrote: 
Zero chance I'm gonna read all of that. Does this excerpt sum up the piece?:

Trump the loser, the outsider, the hot mess, the pathetic joke, embodies this duality. Trump represents both the alpha and the beta. He is a successful person who, as the left often notes, is also the exact opposite — a grotesque loser, sensitive and prideful about his outsider status, ready at the drop of a hat to go on the attack, self-obsessed, selfish, abrogating, unquestioning of his own mansplaining and spreading, so insecure he must assault women. In other words, to paraphrase Truman Capote, he is someone with his nose pressed so hard up against the glass he looks ridiculous. And for this reason, (because he knows he is substanceless) he must constantly re-affirm his own ego. Or as Errol Morris put it, quoting Borges, he is a “labyrinth with no center”.

But, what the left doesn’t realize is, this is not a problem for Trump’s supporters, rather, the reason why they support him.

Trump supporters voted for the con-man, the labyrinth with no center, because the labyrinth with no center is how they feel, how they feel the world works around them. A labyrinth with no center is a perfect description of their mother’s basement with a terminal to an endless array of escapist fantasy worlds.

 

If that's what Trump's younger supporters are all about, they haven't realized that self-destructive rejection of the status quo just makes matters worse. 

I think he's just reality-TV entertainment to them with a whiff of punk-rock middle-finger anger at social niceties and fake PC conventional BS. You have to wonder how happy his supporters will be when they realize Trump isn't making their lives better, he's actually making them worse. 

 Red_Dragon wrote: 
 
Mine too. I try so hard not to be judgy. Lord knows, I try. But these boys - yes, BOYS are f*cking "Lord of the Flies" morons. Their parents should drag them out of the basements they waste away in and ship them off to a third world country (with NO Internet) where they are made to do some good, backbreaking work helping people with crops or wells or building town libraries....living on simple, substantial diets and going to sleep exhausted each night. Let them know what it actually feels like to make productive use of their time...that actually contributes to the wellbeing of others. Then maybe they'd take life more seriously and not squander it on hours spent in fantasy and other such bullshit.
 
 

 
 

 ScottFromWyoming wrote: 
That made my head hurt.

Maybe this should go in favorite quotes

Look, having nuclear—my uncle was a great professor and scientist  and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, 
OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart 
—you know, if you're a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, 
like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I'm one of the 
smartest people anywhere in the world—it's true!—but when you're a 
conservative Republican they try—oh, do they do a number—that's 
why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went 
there, went there, did this, built a fortune—you know I have to give my 
like credentials all the time, because we're a little disadvantaged—but 
you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me—it would 
have been so easy, and it's not as important as these lives are (nuclear 
is powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the 
power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of 
what's going to happen and he was right—who would have thought?), 
but when you look at what's going on with the four prisoners—now it 
used to be three, now it's four—but when it was three and even now, I 
would have said it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, 
you know, they don't, they haven't figured that the women are smarter 
right now than the men, so, you know, it's gonna take them about 
another 150 years—but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians  are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4546796/donald-trump-sentence

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote: 

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote: 
 
I know, from talking to friends and, yes, family members who voted for him that they are/were hoping the Republicans could get done the stuff they felt Obama didn't—no matter who was put in the White House. Some of them still could not get affordable healthcare, especially when self-employed. Some of them were single-issues voters (abortion) and don't really like Trump, but feel the GOP would be the only ones to support their beliefs. Some despised Hillary and her emails so much that they felt the other side deserved the vote. I know that a cousin really does want to see more immigration control (not contempt toward anyone, but something to make him feel safer from terrorism). But what my sister asked some of them was—-don't you realize the insanity you're aligning yourselves with, in the process?? There is nothing Trump can say or do that's bad enough for them to withdraw support. More than anything, they just want the GOP to have a turn.
 
What are they missing? The big picture of the consequences putting such an inept, inexperienced person in charge. The ripple effect on the rest of the world and the interconnection of it all.
 
IMHO

 Red_Dragon wrote: 
Tragi what happened over there... Ppppfffftttttt

je suis Sweden

As Trump appears to be proving his ineptitude for the office, this piece about his voting base rung bells with me. 

The question is, what happens when "even" DT fails to deliver to this pretty large segment of the population?

I think there is a huge crisis in western values/economies going on at the moment, despite the unprecedented living standards a lot of us (most of us?) now enjoy. Something very fundamental to what makes us tick as a species has gotten lost along the way. When overt tribalism rears its ugly head around what is basically a modern version of a witch doctor who incessantly incants an entire litany of what, when it comes down to it, is pure bullshit and then prances about in a deranged manner on the world stage then it makes me a tad worried about the future of civilisation.
I think we should move the focus away from Trump. We should focus instead on the people who look to him as some kind of answer. What exactly are these people looking for? What are they missing? Is the public sector simply failing to invest in the infrastructure that serves the people? Is that the acid eroding our social cohesion? A lack of opportunity? Illusory benchmarks? What is it?

 Red_Dragon wrote: 

Trump family’s elaborate lifestyle is a ‘logistical nightmare’ — at taxpayer expense

Barely a month into the Trump presidency, the unusually elaborate lifestyle of America’s new first family is straining the Secret Service and security officials, stirring financial and logistical concerns in several local communities, and costing far beyond what has been typical for past presidents — a price tag that, based on past assessments of presidential travel and security costs, could balloon into the hundreds of millions of dollars over the course of a four-year term.

...

Trump’s three Mar-a-Lago trips since the inauguration have probably cost the federal treasury about $10 million, based on figures used in an October government report analyzing White House travel, including money for Coast Guard units to patrol the exposed shoreline and other military, security and staffing expenses associated with moving the apparatus of the presidency.

...

In New York, the city is paying $500,000 a day to guard Trump Tower, according to police officials’ estimates, an amount that could reach $183 million a year.

...


Trump’s frequent travel belies his repeated criticism of Obama as a “habitual vacationer” enjoying taxpayer-funded golf getaways. It also comes after his own promises: He told the Hill newspaper in 2015, “I would rarely leave the White House because there’s so much work to be done.”

Presidential families have for decades been guaranteed round-the-clock protection, no matter the expense or destination. Every presidency has brought new operational challenges and lifestyle habits, from George W. Bush’s frequent stays at his remote ranch in Texas to Obama’s annual trips to Martha’s Vineyard and his native state of Hawaii. Judicial Watch estimated that Obama-related travel expenses totaled nearly $97 million over eight years.

 

This from the guy who has traveled to Florida what - every damn weekend since he's been in office?

Less than 24 hours left in the 30 days Trump promised to give "the generals" to get their plan to defeat ISIS to his desk.

 Red_Dragon wrote: 
Yes, that's how it starts.  It's also ironic how often he likes to use the term "fake news", since fake news substantially contributed to his being elected.

“The news is fake because so much of the news is fake,” 

This is some seriously fascist demagoguery folks.