[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

What Did You See Today? - ScottFromWyoming - May 10, 2024 - 11:54pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - May 10, 2024 - 10:51pm
 
Israel - R_P - May 10, 2024 - 10:09pm
 
Wordle - daily game - NoEnzLefttoSplit - May 10, 2024 - 10:02pm
 
Joe Biden - R_P - May 10, 2024 - 9:46pm
 
2024 Elections! - R_P - May 10, 2024 - 9:13pm
 
Beer - ScottFromWyoming - May 10, 2024 - 8:58pm
 
It's the economy stupid. - thisbody - May 10, 2024 - 3:21pm
 
What the hell OV? - thisbody - May 10, 2024 - 3:15pm
 
Oh dear god, BEES! - R_P - May 10, 2024 - 3:11pm
 
Tornado! - miamizsun - May 10, 2024 - 2:49pm
 
The 1960s - kcar - May 10, 2024 - 2:49pm
 
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see - thisbody - May 10, 2024 - 2:49pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - thisbody - May 10, 2024 - 2:31pm
 
NY Times Strands - geoff_morphini - May 10, 2024 - 12:28pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 10, 2024 - 11:38am
 
Climate Change - R_P - May 10, 2024 - 10:08am
 
NYTimes Connections - Bill_J - May 10, 2024 - 9:58am
 
Name My Band - GeneP59 - May 10, 2024 - 9:35am
 
Things You Thought Today - GeneP59 - May 10, 2024 - 9:28am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - GeneP59 - May 10, 2024 - 9:25am
 
Marko Haavisto & Poutahaukat - thisbody - May 10, 2024 - 7:57am
 
Artificial Intelligence - miamizsun - May 10, 2024 - 6:51am
 
Living in America - Proclivities - May 10, 2024 - 6:45am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - May 10, 2024 - 6:15am
 
Virginia News - Red_Dragon - May 10, 2024 - 5:42am
 
China - miamizsun - May 10, 2024 - 5:30am
 
Outstanding Covers - Steely_D - May 10, 2024 - 12:56am
 
May 2024 Photo Theme - Peaceful - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 9, 2024 - 4:31pm
 
Democratic Party - R_P - May 9, 2024 - 3:06pm
 
RP on HomePod mini - RPnate1 - May 9, 2024 - 10:52am
 
Interesting Words - Proclivities - May 9, 2024 - 10:22am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - May 9, 2024 - 9:40am
 
Surfing! - oldviolin - May 9, 2024 - 9:21am
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - islander - May 9, 2024 - 7:21am
 
Breaking News - maryte - May 9, 2024 - 7:17am
 
Guns - Red_Dragon - May 9, 2024 - 6:16am
 
Song of the Day - miamizsun - May 9, 2024 - 5:44am
 
The Obituary Page - Coaxial - May 8, 2024 - 6:46pm
 
Spambags on RP - Steely_D - May 8, 2024 - 2:30pm
 
Suggestion for new RP Channel: Modern / Family - Ruuddie - May 8, 2024 - 11:46am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - rgio - May 8, 2024 - 8:35am
 
Trump - ColdMiser - May 8, 2024 - 7:45am
 
Gaming, Shopping, and More? Samsung's Metaverse Plans for... - alexhoxdson - May 8, 2024 - 7:00am
 
SLOVENIA - novitibo - May 8, 2024 - 1:38am
 
Reviews and Pix from your concerts and shows you couldn't... - haresfur - May 7, 2024 - 10:46pm
 
Eclectic Sound-Drops - Manbird - May 7, 2024 - 10:18pm
 
Farts! - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 7, 2024 - 9:53pm
 
The RP YouTube (Google) Group - oldviolin - May 7, 2024 - 8:46pm
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - May 7, 2024 - 8:35pm
 
What Are You Going To Do Today? - Manbird - May 7, 2024 - 7:55pm
 
Russia - R_P - May 7, 2024 - 1:59am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 6, 2024 - 8:51pm
 
Politically Uncorrect News - oldviolin - May 6, 2024 - 2:15pm
 
What can you hear right now? - maryte - May 6, 2024 - 2:01pm
 
Other Medical Stuff - kurtster - May 6, 2024 - 1:04pm
 
Rock Mix not up to same audio quality as Main and Mellow? - rp567 - May 6, 2024 - 12:06pm
 
Music Requests - black321 - May 6, 2024 - 11:57am
 
NASA & other news from space - NoEnzLefttoSplit - May 6, 2024 - 11:37am
 
Global Warming - NoEnzLefttoSplit - May 6, 2024 - 9:29am
 
Tales from the RAFT - NoEnzLefttoSplit - May 6, 2024 - 9:19am
 
Food - DaveInSaoMiguel - May 6, 2024 - 4:17am
 
The Abortion Wars - thisbody - May 5, 2024 - 3:27pm
 
Those Lovable Policemen - R_P - May 5, 2024 - 3:12pm
 
Ukraine - thisbody - May 5, 2024 - 12:33pm
 
volcano! - geoff_morphini - May 5, 2024 - 9:55am
 
Tesla (motors, batteries, etc) - miamizsun - May 5, 2024 - 6:16am
 
Favorite Quotes - Isabeau - May 4, 2024 - 5:21pm
 
Anti-War - R_P - May 4, 2024 - 3:24pm
 
Iran - Red_Dragon - May 4, 2024 - 12:03pm
 
Live Music - oldviolin - May 4, 2024 - 11:18am
 
SCOTUS - Steely_D - May 4, 2024 - 8:04am
 
The Dragons' Roost - GeneP59 - May 3, 2024 - 3:53pm
 
RightWingNutZ - islander - May 3, 2024 - 11:55am
 
Poetry Forum - oldviolin - May 3, 2024 - 9:46am
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Sex Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 22, 23, 24 ... 164, 165, 166  Next
Post to this Topic
winter

winter Avatar

Location: in exile, as always
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:45am

 oldslabsides wrote:

Depends on your local laws, I think.

 


What if he doesn't use adult diapers? Not sexually, anyway.
Zep

Zep Avatar

Location: Funkytown


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:44am

 hippiechick wrote:
People this is sex
.....
You may feel like you're getting fucked, but there is definitely a difference
 
My corp firewall is blocking those, and for that, perhaps I should feel grateful.
 
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:42am

 winter wrote:

Say, if I tip a sex worker after he performs for a potential client, is that deductible as a business expense?

 
Depends on your local laws, I think.


sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:41am

 winter wrote:

Say, if I tip a sex worker after he performs for a potential client, is that deductible as a business expense?

 

As your attorney I advise you, yes. 
winter

winter Avatar

Location: in exile, as always
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:33am

 sirdroseph wrote:


Quite.

 


Say, if I tip a sex worker after he performs for a potential client, is that deductible as a business expense?
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:30am

 winter wrote:

Yes.

 

Quite.
winter

winter Avatar

Location: in exile, as always
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:27am

 oldslabsides wrote:


indeed.

 


Yes.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:26am

 winter wrote:

Tax policy is weird.

 

indeed.
winter

winter Avatar

Location: in exile, as always
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:22am

 Lazy8 wrote:
 oldslabsides wrote:
Those particular tax laws probably date to a time when marriage was considered something the state had a "compelling interest" in because the morality of the day stipulated that only married couples could breed.  It's an example not only of legislating morality but of social engineering via taxation.

It goes the other way too: a two-earner household can pay higher rates married than single because they get bumped to a higher bracket (the "marriage penalty"). With one earner making substantially more than the other it works the other way.
 


Tax policy is weird.
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:41am

People this is sex



This is not



You may feel like you're getting fucked, but there is definitely a difference
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:37am

 oldslabsides wrote:
Those particular tax laws probably date to a time when marriage was considered something the state had a "compelling interest" in because the morality of the day stipulated that only married couples could breed.  It's an example not only of legislating morality but of social engineering via taxation.

It goes the other way too: a two-earner household can pay higher rates married than single because they get bumped to a higher bracket (the "marriage penalty"). With one earner making substantially more than the other it works the other way.

hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:34am

 oldslabsides wrote:

Those particular tax laws probably date to a time when marriage was considered something the state had a "compelling interest" in because the morality of the day stipulated that only married couples could breed.  It's an example not only of legislating morality but of social engineering via taxation.
 
If you want to talk taxes, go find another thread. Marriage has nothing to do with sex (all too often, unfortunately). But I think someone here doesn't know that.

Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:30am

 sirdroseph wrote:


According to the GOP, that time is now.{#Rolleyes}

 
Well, some people...

sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:29am

 oldslabsides wrote:

Those particular tax laws probably date to a time when marriage was considered something the state had a "compelling interest" in because the morality of the day stipulated that only married couples could breed.  It's an example not only of legislating morality but of social engineering via taxation.
 

According to the GOP, that time is now.{#Rolleyes}
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:26am

 rosedraws wrote:

Just yesterday I was talking with my business partner about marrying her life partner of 15+ years.  They didn't want to get married, they feel committed enough without the paper.  But we opened up the Turbo Tax, and plugged in the numbers comparing filing separately as singles, and filing jointly as a married couple.  Their tax savings were at least $2,000 per year.

Then we started wondering why the government would offer incentives for marriage?  What's in it for them?
 
Those particular tax laws probably date to a time when marriage was considered something the state had a "compelling interest" in because the morality of the day stipulated that only married couples could breed.  It's an example not only of legislating morality but of social engineering via taxation.

Alexandra

Alexandra Avatar

Location: PNW
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:15am

 rosedraws wrote:

Just yesterday I was talking with my business partner about marrying her life partner of 15+ years.  They didn't want to get married, they feel committed enough without the paper.  But we opened up the Turbo Tax, and plugged in the numbers comparing filing separately as singles, and filing jointly as a married couple.  Their tax savings were at least $2,000 per year.

Then we started wondering why the government would offer incentives for marriage?  What's in it for them?


 

Maybe the conservatives (who are religious) feel better about people not living in "sin?"   {#Ask} Good question.
rosedraws

rosedraws Avatar

Location: close to the edge
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:13am

 Alexandra wrote:


I often think to myself that some people should just live together and quit making it legal. All they do is make attorneys rich. I also think (and I know this sounds horrible) that if people do have marriages, there can be renewal period every 5 years to stay or go without any legals becoming involved. That is just the nature of marriage these days...many people settle/choose too quickly....or a partner changes drastically on them...or worse things....and then find that they really don't want to have to pay for the mistake with the rest of their lives. If the "for life" stigma/burden is removed, maybe it would be easier for people to decide to find happiness.

/2 cents

 
Just yesterday I was talking with my business partner about marrying her life partner of 15+ years.  They didn't want to get married, they feel committed enough without the paper.  But we opened up the Turbo Tax, and plugged in the numbers comparing filing separately as singles, and filing jointly as a married couple.  Their tax savings were at least $2,000 per year.

Then we started wondering why the government would offer incentives for marriage?  What's in it for them?

Alexandra

Alexandra Avatar

Location: PNW
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:13am

 buzz wrote:

maybe people should think a little longer and harder before making a commitment.

 

I agree, but shit does happen sometimes, even if they do. I dodged two bullets in the past. If I'd married them, I'd probably be divorced now. It really does pay (literally) to be picky. {#Lol}


oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:12am

 buzz wrote:

maybe people should think a little longer and harder before making a commitment.

 

Thanks. I'll remember that next time around.


buzz

buzz Avatar

Location: up the boohai


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:11am

 Alexandra wrote:


I often think to myself that some people should just live together and quit making it legal. All they do is make attorneys rich. I also think (and I know this sounds horrible) that if people do have marriages, there can be renewal period every 5 years to stay or go without any legals becoming involved. That is just the nature of marriage these days...many people settle/choose too quickly....or a partner changes drastically on them...or worse things....and then find that they really don't want to have to pay for the mistake with the rest of their lives. If the "for life" stigma/burden is removed, maybe it would be easier for people to decide to find happiness.

/2 cents

 
maybe people should think a little longer and harder before making a commitment.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 22, 23, 24 ... 164, 165, 166  Next