[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Things You Thought Today - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 17, 2024 - 8:46am
 
NYTimes Connections - maryte - Jul 17, 2024 - 8:42am
 
Trump - Jiggz - Jul 17, 2024 - 8:14am
 
Wordle - daily game - maryte - Jul 17, 2024 - 8:10am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - Steely_D - Jul 17, 2024 - 7:51am
 
NY Times Strands - geoff_morphini - Jul 17, 2024 - 7:38am
 
Best Song Comments. - q4Fry - Jul 17, 2024 - 7:32am
 
Rhetorical questions - sunybuny - Jul 17, 2024 - 7:29am
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - black321 - Jul 17, 2024 - 6:49am
 
Musky Mythology - Red_Dragon - Jul 17, 2024 - 5:47am
 
The Republican Convention - Steely_D - Jul 17, 2024 - 5:47am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Coaxial - Jul 17, 2024 - 4:57am
 
Today in History - sunybuny - Jul 17, 2024 - 4:56am
 
Israel - R_P - Jul 16, 2024 - 9:21pm
 
What questions would you like to answer for the world? - oldviolin - Jul 16, 2024 - 5:43pm
 
Democratic Party - Red_Dragon - Jul 16, 2024 - 4:48pm
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Jul 16, 2024 - 4:35pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Jul 16, 2024 - 3:57pm
 
Song of the Day - oldviolin - Jul 16, 2024 - 3:53pm
 
Race in America - Red_Dragon - Jul 16, 2024 - 3:53pm
 
Live Music - skyguy - Jul 16, 2024 - 3:44pm
 
Guns - Red_Dragon - Jul 16, 2024 - 3:43pm
 
Joe Biden - islander - Jul 16, 2024 - 3:33pm
 
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 16, 2024 - 2:58pm
 
New Music - thisbody - Jul 16, 2024 - 2:26pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - thisbody - Jul 16, 2024 - 12:59pm
 
Gimmie 5 Kurt! - thisbody - Jul 16, 2024 - 12:30pm
 
China - thisbody - Jul 16, 2024 - 12:05pm
 
Project 2025 - thisbody - Jul 16, 2024 - 11:44am
 
Acoustic Guitar - thisbody - Jul 16, 2024 - 11:08am
 
Bear! - Beaker - Jul 16, 2024 - 6:43am
 
July 2024 Photo Theme - Summer - MrDill - Jul 16, 2024 - 6:05am
 
2024 Elections! - R_P - Jul 15, 2024 - 8:43pm
 
Favorite Quotes - Isabeau - Jul 15, 2024 - 3:43pm
 
kurtster's quiet vinyl - kurtster - Jul 15, 2024 - 1:56pm
 
Words that should be put on the substitutes bench for a year - Isabeau - Jul 15, 2024 - 12:25pm
 
The Truth About (Modern) Popular Music - Proclivities - Jul 15, 2024 - 8:18am
 
Please don't ban me, but: Taylor Swift... - sunybuny - Jul 15, 2024 - 4:55am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - Beaker - Jul 14, 2024 - 3:51pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Jul 14, 2024 - 12:52pm
 
Media Bias - Beaker - Jul 14, 2024 - 9:46am
 
what the hell, miamizsun? - oldviolin - Jul 14, 2024 - 7:51am
 
The Obituary Page - DaveInSaoMiguel - Jul 14, 2024 - 6:42am
 
AH! There's an elephant in the room! - Red_Dragon - Jul 13, 2024 - 3:42pm
 
Outstanding Covers - DaveInSaoMiguel - Jul 13, 2024 - 12:49pm
 
Evolution! - R_P - Jul 13, 2024 - 10:34am
 
Climate Change - R_P - Jul 13, 2024 - 10:28am
 
Eclectic Sound-Drops - oldviolin - Jul 13, 2024 - 10:23am
 
What the hell OV? - oldviolin - Jul 13, 2024 - 10:03am
 
Europe - thisbody - Jul 12, 2024 - 11:35pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Jul 12, 2024 - 9:59pm
 
RP on Mac Just Stopped Working - tourtelot - Jul 12, 2024 - 9:35pm
 
Are they married yet? YES THEY ARE! - Manbird - Jul 12, 2024 - 2:51pm
 
Tech & Science - Manbird - Jul 12, 2024 - 2:46pm
 
Classic TV Curiosities - Proclivities - Jul 12, 2024 - 12:50pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - simonchutchings - Jul 12, 2024 - 11:24am
 
Ukraine - R_P - Jul 12, 2024 - 10:48am
 
Florida - miamizsun - Jul 12, 2024 - 7:05am
 
Regarding Birds - Jiggz - Jul 12, 2024 - 1:41am
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - thisbody - Jul 11, 2024 - 10:36pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - Antigone - Jul 11, 2024 - 2:36pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 11, 2024 - 2:05pm
 
Record Store Day - Proclivities - Jul 11, 2024 - 8:18am
 
What makes you smile? - Steely_D - Jul 11, 2024 - 5:12am
 
Derplahoma! - sunybuny - Jul 11, 2024 - 4:39am
 
Russia - thisbody - Jul 11, 2024 - 3:11am
 
France - thisbody - Jul 11, 2024 - 3:04am
 
Britain - thisbody - Jul 10, 2024 - 11:36pm
 
Good Idea / Bad Idea - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 10, 2024 - 4:39pm
 
How's the weather? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 10, 2024 - 4:35pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 10, 2024 - 2:56pm
 
SCOTUS - Red_Dragon - Jul 10, 2024 - 2:20pm
 
Twitter and democracy - R_P - Jul 10, 2024 - 8:40am
 
Baseball, anyone? - Bill_J - Jul 9, 2024 - 8:58pm
 
Is RP stuck in a loop? - thisbody - Jul 9, 2024 - 3:51pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 41, 42, 43  Next
Post to this Topic
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 16, 2024 - 2:58pm

 Lazy8 wrote:

Sabine Hossenfelder takes the gloves off.





 I looked for a :thumbsup:
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 16, 2024 - 2:43pm

Sabine Hossenfelder takes the gloves off.


R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 23, 2024 - 8:04pm

"The Economist latest cover story on solar energy is packed with interesting stats."


Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 14, 2024 - 6:42am

The cement that could turn your house into a giant battery
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: May 24, 2024 - 6:55am

 islander wrote:


Germany has too many solar panels, and it's pushed energy prices into negative territory



https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/commodities/solar-panel-supply-german-electricity-prices-negative-renewable-demand-green-2024-5

Headline is a little misleading. The negative pricing was only during peak production. Germany fails to store most of the energy produced in that window. But this shows that there is plenty of capacity available.


Especially since Germany isn't a particularly sunny place.
islander

islander Avatar

Location: West coast somewhere
Gender: Male


Posted: May 24, 2024 - 6:19am



Germany has too many solar panels, and it's pushed energy prices into negative territory



https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/commodities/solar-panel-supply-german-electricity-prices-negative-renewable-demand-green-2024-5

Headline is a little misleading. The negative pricing was only during peak production. Germany fails to store most of the energy produced in that window. But this shows that there is plenty of capacity available.
islander

islander Avatar

Location: West coast somewhere
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 8:00am

 Lazy8 wrote:

Wrong verb. Let people build them. Do away with zoning laws that prevent them from building solar roofs and they'll do it to save money. Stop trying to force the future and let the future happen.


We're also going to do away with arcane permitting rules that require people to have a grid connection too right?  There have been incentives and subsidies for all the traditional sources for decades to force their adoption. We now know (we knew then too) that there are substantial issues with those sources, but they were there supporting the right politicians, so the rules were made. 
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 7:59am

 Lazy8 wrote:

Wrong verb. Let people build them. Do away with zoning laws that prevent them from building solar roofs and they'll do it to save money. Stop trying to force the future and let the future happen.


Hmm, not having solar i wasnt aware there were zoning issues...though not surprised as trying to add even a 10x12 deck requires months of paperwork and thousands of $. 
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 7:58am

 Lazy8 wrote:

Wrong verb. Let people build them. Do away with zoning laws that prevent them from building solar roofs and they'll do it to save money. Stop trying to force the future and let the future happen.


now you're talking.
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 7:56am

 black321 wrote:
Well why not a decentralized hybrid approach?
Build more houses with solar/windmills?

Wrong verb. Let people build them. Do away with zoning laws that prevent them from building solar roofs and they'll do it to save money. Stop trying to force the future and let the future happen.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 7:52am

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 7:45am

 Lazy8 wrote:

No.

The big problem with renewables is the ratio of power generated to resources (land, material, labor, energy, capital) required to build them. You can think of this as cost, which greenies tend to think of as irrelevant, but it represents real resources. If the power generated doesn't justify the investment it's a net loss. A step backward. Coal burnt and labor spent that shouldn't have been.

Some projects make sense, some don't. The ones that make sense will happen because those building them can see a return; the ones that don't make sense get subsidized—propped up as a huge virtue signal measurable in tons of CO2, cubic miles of earth dug up, and years wasted.

Yes, there are technical problems, but they're solvable. The problem of humans deluding themselves that they're making progress by building windmills that spend most of their lives idle has proved a lot more intractable.


ok, when I have time, I'll look into the energy budget of windmills. I do know they are technically challenging and high maintenance. But I am still surprised at the sheer scale of wind energy output. I live here and it is not like the entire landscape is littered with the damn things, not more than any other major infrastructure.

I know you hate the distortion of government incentives (for good reason) but renewables are certainly not the only energy sector to have benefited from them. Nuclear, coal and oil & gas have too over the years. 

Anyways,  a cursory look at solar shows that a panel assuming an  average daily generation of 2kW will have produced more power than was needed to build it within the first 1000 hours of operation and will keep running pretty well maintenance free for years to come.   Sounds like a winning formula to me.

So it's not all chasing windmills or unicorns.
And the oil&gas lobby has been strangely quiet on the opportunity cost of their particular business for, how long now, um, maybe forever. It is not just climate change, but land use, air quality, radiation in the tailings, environmental impact, high fatality and accident rates, etc. 
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 7:39am

Well why not a decentralized hybrid approach?
Build more houses with solar/windmills? 
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 26, 2024 - 7:31am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
The big problem with renewables is securing the base load. This is why gas-fired plants are still so important, as you can fire them up at short notice to meet peak demand. 
the only renewable source with that kind of flexibility is hydro and pumped storage, but there is nowhere enough of it to meet the baseload.

No.

The big problem with renewables is the ratio of power generated to resources (land, material, labor, energy, capital) required to build them. You can think of this as cost, which greenies tend to think of as irrelevant, but it represents real resources. If the power generated doesn't justify the investment it's a net loss. A step backward. Coal burnt and labor spent that shouldn't have been.

Some projects make sense, some don't. The ones that make sense will happen because those building them can see a return; the ones that don't make sense get subsidized—propped up as a huge virtue signal measurable in tons of CO2, cubic miles of earth dug up, and years wasted.

Yes, there are technical problems, but they're solvable. The problem of humans deluding themselves that they're making progress by building windmills that spend most of their lives idle has proved a lot more intractable.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 24, 2024 - 9:16pm

 haresfur wrote:


One of my big frustrations with energy policy in Australia is the lack of support for gas generation to support peak demand. The environmentalists take a "build it and they will come" attitude to renewables and think that the problem of peak demand will somehow be solved if non-renewable options are off the table. Meanwhile labor and liberals tacitly support continued coal generation because the union jobs are joined at the hip to big business mining. The opportunities for pumped hydro storage are limited by the lack of suitable rivers. Locally, there was an initial assessment that showed the promise for pumped hydro using the maze of mine shafts beneath the town, going down well over a kilometer in depth (no evaporation loss). The catch is that the next study needed would be a quite expensive demonstration that they could keep the upper zone in one mine trend isolated from the deep zone in another and no one wants to spend that. So they will turn off the pumps and flood the deep zone to the point where it will be impossible to reverse.

So that leaves battery storage, which has had some success in South Australia but will be hard to scale up to the level needed. And there is a growing opposition to the impacts of lithium mining. Don't get me started on the limitations put on wind generation by nimbys on the right and left. 


tbh, 20 years ago as the whole wind thing was starting to stoke investor interest here (because of tax breaks) I was thinking, yeah, good to have, but, you know, unicorns. 

I am actually surprised  that so much of Germany's power now comes from renewables. Never thought it would happen at that scale or so quickly. 
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 24, 2024 - 4:18pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

of course, but that is the great virtue of a continent-wide grid: for instance, excess wind power from Germany and the Netherlands on windy days is used to pump water into hydrostorage in, say, Norway, (and because Norway can buy it cheaply due to oversupply on such days), then when spot prices rise, Norway can ramp up their hydropower plants to generate power that it can then sell at a premium.  It's actually a win-win situation.
In fact there is a lot more granularity than that, as providers can respond almost immediately to spot prices. Our residential development has a small gas-fired co-gen plant that only fires up during peak demand. We get the waste heat to warm our houses and hot water. Again, a win-win. 

The big problem with renewables is securing the base load. This is why gas-fired plants are still so important, as you can fire them up at short notice to meet peak demand. 
the only renewable source with that kind of flexibility is hydro and pumped storage, but there is nowhere enough of it to meet the baseload. 



One of my big frustrations with energy policy in Australia is the lack of support for gas generation to support peak demand. The environmentalists take a "build it and they will come" attitude to renewables and think that the problem of peak demand will somehow be solved if non-renewable options are off the table. Meanwhile labor and liberals tacitly support continued coal generation because the union jobs are joined at the hip to big business mining. The opportunities for pumped hydro storage are limited by the lack of suitable rivers. Locally, there was an initial assessment that showed the promise for pumped hydro using the maze of mine shafts beneath the town, going down well over a kilometer in depth (no evaporation loss). The catch is that the next study needed would be a quite expensive demonstration that they could keep the upper zone in one mine trend isolated from the deep zone in another and no one wants to spend that. So they will turn off the pumps and flood the deep zone to the point where it will be impossible to reverse.

So that leaves battery storage, which has had some success in South Australia but will be hard to scale up to the level needed. And there is a growing opposition to the impacts of lithium mining. Don't get me started on the limitations put on wind generation by nimbys on the right and left. 
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 24, 2024 - 3:15pm

 Lazy8 wrote:

Net imports. There are a lot more days when Germany imports power than exports, and on those days it's a lot more than 2%.


of course, but that is the great virtue of a continent-wide grid: for instance, excess wind power from Germany and the Netherlands on windy days is used to pump water into hydrostorage in, say, Norway, (and because Norway can buy it cheaply due to oversupply on such days), then when spot prices rise, Norway can ramp up their hydropower plants to generate power that it can then sell at a premium.  It's actually a win-win situation.
In fact there is a lot more granularity than that, as providers can respond almost immediately to spot prices. Our residential development has a small gas-fired co-gen plant that only fires up during peak demand. We get the waste heat to warm our houses and hot water. Again, a win-win. 

The big problem with renewables is securing the base load. This is why gas-fired plants are still so important, as you can fire them up at short notice to meet peak demand. 
the only renewable source with that kind of flexibility is hydro and pumped storage, but there is nowhere enough of it to meet the baseload. 

Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 24, 2024 - 2:24pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
oh I agree with the stupidity of shutting down perfectly good nuclear stations that had already 1) amortised themselves and 2) were good to go for a few years yet and 3) were pretty much carbon neutral.    but see page 6 of this for more on Germany's net electricity imports/exports. IIRC we were exporting lots of electricity to France in 2021 in the middle of their drought as they had no cooling water.

Here's a nice breakdown for you. imports only accounted for about 2% in 2023.

Net imports. There are a lot more days when Germany imports power than exports, and on those days it's a lot more than 2%.

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 24, 2024 - 11:08am

 Lazy8 wrote:

See the demand load, mostly in excess of native production? That's imported power, mostly nuclear from France. That could have been done in-country but for colossally stupid decisions driven by superstition.
oh I agree with the stupidity of shutting down perfectly good nuclear stations that had already 1) amortised themselves and 2) were good to go for a few years yet and 3) were pretty much carbon neutral.    but see page 6 of this for more on Germany's net electricity imports/exports. IIRC we were exporting lots of electricity to France in 2021 in the middle of their drought as they had no cooling water.

Here's a nice breakdown for you. imports only accounted for about 2% in 2023.

Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 24, 2024 - 8:54am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
The German energy charts are fascinating.  

Renewables are really making a massive impact with the share of coal constantly declining. And this was a week at the end of winter/beginning of spring. 
The cloudy days of no wind are still the issue (see March 20) But otherwise,  renewables are performing brilliantly. Now all we need is more pumped storage to cover those gaps.

See the demand load, mostly in excess of native production? That's imported power, mostly nuclear from France. That could have been done in-country but for colossally stupid decisions driven by superstition.

Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 41, 42, 43  Next