R_P wrote:

Can you say: World War III?

Again probably promising the Kurdish useful idiots that independence is just around the corner if you help us ignite a civil war.

 R_P wrote:

That is "old news". Perhaps months old.

Here's another Aussie but with a working brain

Trigger warning: RT

"for what he called" FUD

Probably exaggerated relief

 R_P wrote:

As I said, I fully support Albanese's statement because it wasn't really stupid. You on the other hand apparently support anyone and anything that is anti-American. Yet another extremist.

As to my  post history, I'm not going to even bother looking at it (apparently you don't really care to, either). However, in a nutshell, my position is what the fuck did Hamas expect with their terrorist attack on Israel? The gave the current Israeli government license to harden their positions, stifle the dissent that was building in the country at the time, and an excuse for the extreme and abhorrent use of force in Gaza. 

 haresfur wrote:
There was no claim about Albanese other than that he's a Commonwealth cretin (for saying something really stupid). You're both free to say stupid things though. It's helpful.

If anyone cares they can examine your post history. Pretty sure it's in the Israel thread.

 R_P wrote:
a) not obvious and not relevant to your claim that Albanese should not have condemned morning the Ayatollah. My  point stands

2) you are making a weird claim with no basis  that I condone Gaza genocide. Once again my point stands that you lack reading comprehension

 haresfur wrote:
That was obviously a reference to the condoned Gaza genocide. Tu quoque.

 R_P wrote:
That is blatantly bullshit. I would have thought you had better reasoning powers. 

Somehow, not morning a religious zealot for the reasons I set out becomes condoning genocide? Get real.

You are the architype us vs them guy

 haresfur wrote:
You're the hysterical us vs. them guy condoning genocide. Makes perfect sense.