Today in History
- R_P - May 13, 2024 - 10:07pm
Israel
- R_P - May 13, 2024 - 9:14pm
Congress
- Red_Dragon - May 13, 2024 - 8:22pm
NY Times Strands
- geoff_morphini - May 13, 2024 - 7:22pm
NYTimes Connections
- geoff_morphini - May 13, 2024 - 7:16pm
Wordle - daily game
- geoff_morphini - May 13, 2024 - 7:08pm
Ukraine
- R_P - May 13, 2024 - 5:50pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - May 13, 2024 - 5:41pm
The Obituary Page
- kurtster - May 13, 2024 - 4:14pm
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc.
- Red_Dragon - May 13, 2024 - 3:36pm
Song of the Day
- DaveInSaoMiguel - May 13, 2024 - 1:48pm
What The Hell Buddy?
- oldviolin - May 13, 2024 - 1:25pm
Surfing!
- KurtfromLaQuinta - May 13, 2024 - 1:21pm
What the hell OV?
- oldviolin - May 13, 2024 - 12:28pm
China
- R_P - May 13, 2024 - 12:11pm
Bad Poetry
- oldviolin - May 13, 2024 - 11:38am
What can you hear right now?
- dischuckin - May 13, 2024 - 11:24am
2024 Elections!
- kurtster - May 13, 2024 - 11:20am
What Did You See Today?
- kurtster - May 13, 2024 - 10:35am
Joe Biden
- R_P - May 13, 2024 - 9:59am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - May 13, 2024 - 9:42am
See This Film
- Red_Dragon - May 13, 2024 - 8:35am
Podcast recommendations???
- ColdMiser - May 13, 2024 - 7:50am
Radio Paradise Comments
- Coaxial - May 13, 2024 - 6:16am
News of the Weird
- Red_Dragon - May 13, 2024 - 5:05am
Mixtape Culture Club
- Lazy8 - May 12, 2024 - 10:26pm
May 2024 Photo Theme - Peaceful
- haresfur - May 12, 2024 - 8:32pm
Trump
- Steely_D - May 12, 2024 - 3:35pm
Those Lovable Policemen
- R_P - May 12, 2024 - 11:31am
Things You Thought Today
- oldviolin - May 12, 2024 - 10:22am
Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - May 12, 2024 - 9:16am
The All-Things Beatles Forum
- Steely_D - May 12, 2024 - 9:04am
Baseball, anyone?
- Red_Dragon - May 12, 2024 - 6:52am
Poetry Forum
- ScottN - May 12, 2024 - 6:32am
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- miamizsun - May 11, 2024 - 10:37am
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see
- oldviolin - May 11, 2024 - 8:43am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- KurtfromLaQuinta - May 11, 2024 - 7:29am
Beer
- ScottFromWyoming - May 10, 2024 - 8:58pm
It's the economy stupid.
- thisbody - May 10, 2024 - 3:21pm
Oh dear god, BEES!
- R_P - May 10, 2024 - 3:11pm
Tornado!
- miamizsun - May 10, 2024 - 2:49pm
The 1960s
- kcar - May 10, 2024 - 2:49pm
Climate Change
- R_P - May 10, 2024 - 10:08am
Name My Band
- GeneP59 - May 10, 2024 - 9:35am
Marko Haavisto & Poutahaukat
- thisbody - May 10, 2024 - 7:57am
Artificial Intelligence
- miamizsun - May 10, 2024 - 6:51am
Living in America
- Proclivities - May 10, 2024 - 6:45am
Virginia News
- Red_Dragon - May 10, 2024 - 5:42am
Outstanding Covers
- Steely_D - May 10, 2024 - 12:56am
Democratic Party
- R_P - May 9, 2024 - 3:06pm
RP on HomePod mini
- RPnate1 - May 9, 2024 - 10:52am
Interesting Words
- Proclivities - May 9, 2024 - 10:22am
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests
- islander - May 9, 2024 - 7:21am
Breaking News
- maryte - May 9, 2024 - 7:17am
Guns
- Red_Dragon - May 9, 2024 - 6:16am
Spambags on RP
- Steely_D - May 8, 2024 - 2:30pm
Suggestion for new RP Channel: Modern / Family
- Ruuddie - May 8, 2024 - 11:46am
Gaming, Shopping, and More? Samsung's Metaverse Plans for...
- alexhoxdson - May 8, 2024 - 7:00am
SLOVENIA
- novitibo - May 8, 2024 - 1:38am
Reviews and Pix from your concerts and shows you couldn't...
- haresfur - May 7, 2024 - 10:46pm
Eclectic Sound-Drops
- Manbird - May 7, 2024 - 10:18pm
Farts!
- KurtfromLaQuinta - May 7, 2024 - 9:53pm
The RP YouTube (Google) Group
- oldviolin - May 7, 2024 - 8:46pm
Dialing 1-800-Manbird
- oldviolin - May 7, 2024 - 8:35pm
What Are You Going To Do Today?
- Manbird - May 7, 2024 - 7:55pm
Russia
- R_P - May 7, 2024 - 1:59am
Politically Uncorrect News
- oldviolin - May 6, 2024 - 2:15pm
Other Medical Stuff
- kurtster - May 6, 2024 - 1:04pm
Rock Mix not up to same audio quality as Main and Mellow?
- rp567 - May 6, 2024 - 12:06pm
Music Requests
- black321 - May 6, 2024 - 11:57am
NASA & other news from space
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - May 6, 2024 - 11:37am
Global Warming
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - May 6, 2024 - 9:29am
Tales from the RAFT
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - May 6, 2024 - 9:19am
Food
- DaveInSaoMiguel - May 6, 2024 - 4:17am
The Abortion Wars
- thisbody - May 5, 2024 - 3:27pm
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
Oh, The Stupidity
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 22, 23, 24 Next |
islander
Location: West coast somewhere Gender:
|
Posted:
Sep 5, 2018 - 4:34pm |
|
black321 wrote:
I still dont believe this is "mostly" a racist issue, but instead this rounds back to our political issues. too many want their way or the highway, without any willingness to compromise with opposing ideas. You stand, take your hat off, and put your hand on your heart during the anthem...
So where is the NFL policy on closing the beer stands and stopping the flow of nacho cheese during the anthem? What about locking the bathrooms, and electrifying the seats to ensure everyone is standing? Honestly, I see more reverence for our anthem from the visiting Cannuks during hockey season that I see from most of my fellow citizens during any of the other occasions. Maybe they just have better writers? True patriot love in all of us command. Their whole anthem talks about the land and duty to it, our talks about symbols and what can be seen, and the perils of those that might oppose us.
|
|
islander
Location: West coast somewhere Gender:
|
Posted:
Sep 5, 2018 - 4:23pm |
|
cc_rider wrote: Yeah, about that...
Protesters in Ferguson, for example, took a different approach. It didn't just make people angry, it brought out a highly-militarized police force.
Marchers try to march peacefully, and are set upon by counter-protesters. Protesters have been viciously beaten - by members of both (every) faction. Sometimes the police intervene, sometimes not. I'm sure race never enters into that equation...
The fact is, black folks live in a different world than white folks. Fact. White parents are not terrified their sons and daughters may not come home. White kids don't necessarily have 'The Talk' drilled into them. White folks do not suffer the daily casual indignities that black folks do. Oprah freakin' Winfrey was followed around a high-end store. The sales manager didn't see the most powerful woman in media, she saw a black woman: danger!
Black folks have protested in every possible other way. Peacefully, violently, sit-ins, strikes, you name it. When the Black Panthers decided to patrol their streets with long guns, perfectly legal, the laws were changed to make it illegal to carry long guns in certain (predominantly black) neighborhoods. Today white folks bring assault rifles to demonstrations with no repercussions. Say what you will about the 2nd amendment, but apply it uniformly. A black man was shot and killed in his car, after he told the officer he had a gun and a license to carry it. He did what the rules say he should, and was murdered anyway. And white folks wonder why some black folks are terrified of police officers?
Black folks have tried everything with little progress. In many ways conditions are getting worse for people of color. They have every right to protest by legal and peaceful means.
I disagreed with sitting on the bench: it's a sign of disrespect in any setting. But kneeling is silent, reflective, even reverential. Colin Kaepernick and Nate Boyer had a serious discussion about the issue, and kneeling was their compromise: respectful protest. And still people lost their minds. What do you suggest? Sing Kumbaya at halftime? What means of protest will satisfy you? What form of protest would get your attention, yet not offend you? I really would like to know, and I'm sure folks like Colin Kaepernick would like to know too.
The whole 'disrespecting the military' is a false narrative designed to denigrate the protest. Mr. Kaepernick and fellow protesters were specific about their reasons.
The fact White America is making such a big deal about this is proof his actions are having some effect. The problem for White America though, it is shining an unwelcome light on the more sordid aspects of US history. History that draws a straight line to the present-day situation. White America does not want to face up to the truth of that history, and certainly doesn't want to face up to how it affects everyday life for black folks.
Peace Y'all, c.
I would add that those who sit comfortably ensconced in the safety provided by society shouldn't really have a say in the method of peaceful protest of those fellow citizens who yearn for those same rights.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming
Location: Powell Gender:
|
Posted:
Sep 5, 2018 - 4:00pm |
|
black321 wrote:
You stand, take your hat off, and put your hand on your heart during the anthem...
Sure. To not do those things when you don't have a particular beef you need to draw attention to, but just because you don't feel like it, that's disrespectful. Or, if your grievance is great enough that it merits the sort of attention that this is getting, then I say go right ahead. If your grievance with the government is you don't like nacho cheese to be so yellow, then maybe the veterans have a point.
|
|
cc_rider
Location: Bastrop Gender:
|
Posted:
Sep 5, 2018 - 3:24pm |
|
black321 wrote: cc_rider wrote: Okay sure, some people don't like it. White, black, or plaid. But what is it going to take for good people, of all colors, to face the real history and make meaningful progress?
In the South there's a lot of talk, and actions, about removing Confederate statues, plaques, etc. There is a plaque in the Texas State Capitol that is particularly egregious. It denies slavery was the primary reason for the Civil War. It was placed circa 1959, in reaction to the social changes starting to happen. To put it in the vernacular, "Them damn n______ was gettin' uppity". And White America was then, and is now, terrified of 'Uppity N______'. That is the crux of the issue, then and now.
The sports pages are full of examples of backlash against athletes speaking up. When LeBron James spoke his mind, people said 'shut up and dribble'. Just one recent example. What they did to Ali was criminal, for an old example. As superstar athletes they have a unique platform to bring attention to important issues. Many sports figures have done great work and are rightly lauded. But one steps out of line, and all of a sudden they're branded a dumb jock, or fined, or blackballed. As soon as one becomes an Uppity N_____, they're out.
People do not want to be confronted by uncomfortable facts, I get it. That doesn't change the facts. Shooting the messenger does not change the message. America is deeply racist, period. Not necessarily by individuals. I agree there are plenty of white folks who can't be considered racist and still object to kneeling. But it's just those people who need to understand where he is coming from. Nate Boyer, the epitome of class, listened to Mr. Kaepernick, and agreed he made good points, which is why he suggested kneeling. What is so terrifying about listening to the man, and trying to understand his point of view?
c. I still dont believe this is "mostly" a racist issue, but instead this rounds back to our political issues. too many want their way or the highway, without any willingness to compromise with opposing ideas. You stand, take your hat off, and put your hand on your heart during the anthem...
I could not have said it better myself. Peace, c.
|
|
black321
Location: An earth without maps Gender:
|
Posted:
Sep 5, 2018 - 3:15pm |
|
cc_rider wrote:
Okay sure, some people don't like it. White, black, or plaid. But what is it going to take for good people, of all colors, to face the real history and make meaningful progress?
In the South there's a lot of talk, and actions, about removing Confederate statues, plaques, etc. There is a plaque in the Texas State Capitol that is particularly egregious. It denies slavery was the primary reason for the Civil War. It was placed circa 1959, in reaction to the social changes starting to happen. To put it in the vernacular, "Them damn n______ was gettin' uppity". And White America was then, and is now, terrified of 'Uppity N______'. That is the crux of the issue, then and now.
The sports pages are full of examples of backlash against athletes speaking up. When LeBron James spoke his mind, people said 'shut up and dribble'. Just one recent example. What they did to Ali was criminal, for an old example. As superstar athletes they have a unique platform to bring attention to important issues. Many sports figures have done great work and are rightly lauded. But one steps out of line, and all of a sudden they're branded a dumb jock, or fined, or blackballed. As soon as one becomes an Uppity N_____, they're out.
People do not want to be confronted by uncomfortable facts, I get it. That doesn't change the facts. Shooting the messenger does not change the message. America is deeply racist, period. Not necessarily by individuals. I agree there are plenty of white folks who can't be considered racist and still object to kneeling. But it's just those people who need to understand where he is coming from. Nate Boyer, the epitome of class, listened to Mr. Kaepernick, and agreed he made good points, which is why he suggested kneeling. What is so terrifying about listening to the man, and trying to understand his point of view?
c.
I still dont believe this is "mostly" a racist issue, but instead this rounds back to our political issues. too many want their way or the highway, without any willingness to compromise with opposing ideas. You stand, take your hat off, and put your hand on your heart during the anthem...
|
|
cc_rider
Location: Bastrop Gender:
|
Posted:
Sep 5, 2018 - 3:06pm |
|
black321 wrote: cc_rider wrote: very well said, but i cant say i completely agree. despite the headlines, which are effective at bringing to light the significant issues black people still face, i would argue the conditions, or more accurately the access to improved conditions are better then ever in this country. as a white person, i have no problem with the light being shone on this issue, or facing the truth of our history. but i'm sure you didnt mean all of white america. yet, there are still those white people who are not racist in any way who object to the kneeling. Okay sure, some people don't like it. White, black, or plaid. But what is it going to take for good people, of all colors, to face the real history and make meaningful progress? In the South there's a lot of talk, and actions, about removing Confederate statues, plaques, etc. There is a plaque in the Texas State Capitol that is particularly egregious. It denies slavery was the primary reason for the Civil War. It was placed circa 1959, in reaction to the social changes starting to happen. To put it in the vernacular, "Them damn n______ was gettin' uppity". And White America was then, and is now, terrified of 'Uppity N______'. That is the crux of the issue, then and now. The sports pages are full of examples of backlash against athletes speaking up. When LeBron James spoke his mind, people said 'shut up and dribble'. Just one recent example. What they did to Ali was criminal, for an old example. As superstar athletes they have a unique platform to bring attention to important issues. Many sports figures have done great work and are rightly lauded. But one steps out of line, and all of a sudden they're branded a dumb jock, or fined, or blackballed. As soon as one becomes an Uppity N_____, they're out. People do not want to be confronted by uncomfortable facts, I get it. That doesn't change the facts. Shooting the messenger does not change the message. America is deeply racist, period. Not necessarily by individuals. I agree there are plenty of white folks who can't be considered racist and still object to kneeling. But it's just those people who need to understand where he is coming from. Nate Boyer, the epitome of class, listened to Mr. Kaepernick, and agreed he made good points, which is why he suggested kneeling. What is so terrifying about listening to the man, and trying to understand his point of view? c.
|
|
black321
Location: An earth without maps Gender:
|
Posted:
Sep 5, 2018 - 2:22pm |
|
cc_rider wrote:
Yeah, about that...
Protesters in Ferguson, for example, took a different approach. It didn't just make people angry, it brought out a highly-militarized police force.
Marchers try to march peacefully, and are set upon by counter-protesters. Protesters have been viciously beaten - by members of both (every) faction. Sometimes the police intervene, sometimes not. I'm sure race never enters into that equation...
The fact is, black folks live in a different world than white folks. Fact. White parents are not terrified their sons and daughters may not come home. White kids don't necessarily have 'The Talk' drilled into them. White folks do not suffer the daily casual indignities that black folks do. Oprah freakin' Winfrey was followed around a high-end store. The sales manager didn't see the most powerful woman in media, she saw a black woman: danger!
Black folks have protested in every possible other way. Peacefully, violently, sit-ins, strikes, you name it. When the Black Panthers decided to patrol their streets with long guns, perfectly legal, the laws were changed to make it illegal to carry long guns in certain (predominantly black) neighborhoods. Today white folks bring assault rifles to demonstrations with no repercussions. Say what you will about the 2nd amendment, but apply it uniformly. A black man was shot and killed in his car, after he told the officer he had a gun and a license to carry it. He did what the rules say he should, and was murdered anyway. And white folks wonder why some black folks are terrified of police officers?
Black folks have tried everything with little progress. In many ways conditions are getting worse for people of color. They have every right to protest by legal and peaceful means.
I disagreed with sitting on the bench: it's a sign of disrespect in any setting. But kneeling is silent, reflective, even reverential. Colin Kaepernick and Nate Boyer had a serious discussion about the issue, and kneeling was their compromise: respectful protest. And still people lost their minds. What do you suggest? Sing Kumbaya at halftime? What means of protest will satisfy you? What form of protest would get your attention, yet not offend you? I really would like to know, and I'm sure folks like Colin Kaepernick would like to know too.
The whole 'disrespecting the military' is a false narrative designed to denigrate the protest. Mr. Kaepernick and fellow protesters were specific about their reasons.
The fact White America is making such a big deal about this is proof his actions are having some effect. The problem for White America though, it is shining an unwelcome light on the more sordid aspects of US history. History that draws a straight line to the present-day situation. White America does not want to face up to the truth of that history, and certainly doesn't want to face up to how it affects everyday life for black folks.
Peace Y'all, c.
very well said, but i cant say i completely agree. despite the headlines, which are effective at bringing to light the significant issues black people still face, i would argue the conditions, or more accurately the access to improved conditions are better then ever in this country. as a white person, i have no problem with the light being shone on this issue, or facing the truth of our history. but i'm sure you didnt mean all of white america. yet, there are still those white people who are not racist in any way who object to the kneeling.
|
|
cc_rider
Location: Bastrop Gender:
|
Posted:
Sep 5, 2018 - 1:52pm |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote: cc_rider wrote: Yeah, about that...
Protesters in Ferguson, for example, took a different approach. It didn't just make people angry, it brought out a highly-militarized police force.
Marchers try to march peacefully, and are set upon by counter-protesters. Protesters have been viciously beaten - by members of both (every) faction. Sometimes the police intervene, sometimes not. I'm sure race never enters into that equation...
The fact is, black folks live in a different world than white folks. Fact. White parents are not terrified their sons and daughters may not come home. White kids don't necessarily have 'The Talk' drilled into them. White folks do not suffer the daily casual indignities that black folks do. Oprah freakin' Winfrey was followed around a high-end store. The sales manager didn't see the most powerful woman in media, she saw a black woman: danger!
Black folks have protested in every possible other way. Peacefully, violently, sit-ins, strikes, you name it. When the Black Panthers decided to patrol their streets with long guns, perfectly legal, the laws were changed to make it illegal to carry long guns in certain (predominantly black) neighborhoods. Today white folks bring assault rifles to demonstrations with no repercussions. Say what you will about the 2nd amendment, but apply it uniformly. A black man was shot and killed in his car, after he told the officer he had a gun and a license to carry it. He did what the rules say he should, and was murdered anyway. And white folks wonder why some black folks are terrified of police officers?
Black folks have tried everything with little progress. In many ways conditions are getting worse for people of color. They have every right to protest by legal and peaceful means.
I disagreed with sitting on the bench: it's a sign of disrespect in any setting. But kneeling is silent, reflective, even reverential. Colin Kaepernick and Nate Boyer had a serious discussion about the issue, and kneeling was their compromise: respectful protest. And still people lost their minds. What do you suggest? Sing Kumbaya at halftime? What means of protest will satisfy you? What form of protest would get your attention, yet not offend you? I really would like to know, and I'm sure folks like Colin Kaepernick would like to know too.
The whole 'disrespecting the military' is a false narrative designed to denigrate the protest. Mr. Kaepernick and fellow protesters were specific about their reasons.
The fact White America is making such a big deal about this is proof his actions are having some effect. The problem for White America though, it is shining an unwelcome light on the more sordid aspects of US history. History that draws a straight line to the present-day situation. White America does not want to face up to the truth of that history, and certainly doesn't want to face up to how it affects everyday life for black folks.
Peace Y'all, c.
Thanks; I wasn't being clear and I don't have enough patience with people who think Kaepernick is doing something/anything wrong to figure out how to state my case more better. No worries. I have lived in the South all my life, and I am still appalled at the virulent racism. It is so widespread, so insidious, most people never even realize it. Even governmental policies and institutions are shot through with racist intent. Austin is easily the most segregated city I've ever lived in. MUCH worse than: Houston, Dallas, Richmond VA, even Montgomery AL. To be fair, 'segregated' is not the same as 'racist'. The policies that made Austin so segregated definitely were racist, however. c.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming
Location: Powell Gender:
|
Posted:
Sep 5, 2018 - 1:01pm |
|
cc_rider wrote:
Yeah, about that...
Protesters in Ferguson, for example, took a different approach. It didn't just make people angry, it brought out a highly-militarized police force.
Marchers try to march peacefully, and are set upon by counter-protesters. Protesters have been viciously beaten - by members of both (every) faction. Sometimes the police intervene, sometimes not. I'm sure race never enters into that equation...
The fact is, black folks live in a different world than white folks. Fact. White parents are not terrified their sons and daughters may not come home. White kids don't necessarily have 'The Talk' drilled into them. White folks do not suffer the daily casual indignities that black folks do. Oprah freakin' Winfrey was followed around a high-end store. The sales manager didn't see the most powerful woman in media, she saw a black woman: danger!
Black folks have protested in every possible other way. Peacefully, violently, sit-ins, strikes, you name it. When the Black Panthers decided to patrol their streets with long guns, perfectly legal, the laws were changed to make it illegal to carry long guns in certain (predominantly black) neighborhoods. Today white folks bring assault rifles to demonstrations with no repercussions. Say what you will about the 2nd amendment, but apply it uniformly. A black man was shot and killed in his car, after he told the officer he had a gun and a license to carry it. He did what the rules say he should, and was murdered anyway. And white folks wonder why some black folks are terrified of police officers?
Black folks have tried everything with little progress. In many ways conditions are getting worse for people of color. They have every right to protest by legal and peaceful means.
I disagreed with sitting on the bench: it's a sign of disrespect in any setting. But kneeling is silent, reflective, even reverential. Colin Kaepernick and Nate Boyer had a serious discussion about the issue, and kneeling was their compromise: respectful protest. And still people lost their minds. What do you suggest? Sing Kumbaya at halftime? What means of protest will satisfy you? What form of protest would get your attention, yet not offend you? I really would like to know, and I'm sure folks like Colin Kaepernick would like to know too.
The whole 'disrespecting the military' is a false narrative designed to denigrate the protest. Mr. Kaepernick and fellow protesters were specific about their reasons.
The fact White America is making such a big deal about this is proof his actions are having some effect. The problem for White America though, it is shining an unwelcome light on the more sordid aspects of US history. History that draws a straight line to the present-day situation. White America does not want to face up to the truth of that history, and certainly doesn't want to face up to how it affects everyday life for black folks.
Peace Y'all, c.
Thanks; I wasn't being clear and I don't have enough patience with people who think Kaepernick is doing something/anything wrong to figure out how to state my case more better.
|
|
maryte
Location: Blinding You With Library Science! Gender:
|
Posted:
Sep 5, 2018 - 12:59pm |
|
Who the f*ck decided that the US Military = US flag? I've never been part of the military - can I get my own damned flag?
|
|
cc_rider
Location: Bastrop Gender:
|
Posted:
Sep 5, 2018 - 12:52pm |
|
sirdroseph wrote: ScottFromWyoming wrote: sirdroseph wrote: Does it? How much discussion is about what they are protesting as opposed to those upset about the anthem and I would submit that with the medias "help" is only to stoke the fires of anger and division because ratings are where the fire is. Sure, but you're advocating letting those people change the definition of the protest, and then wherever the dust settles, that's what the protest was about. Unless you're just one of those nuts who thinks any flag-related protest is abhorrent. I don't. If it's germane to the thing that flag represents, protest away. I guess my point is that I am not really advocating anything other than a better way to protest because in my opinion this one has run its course and is not working in addition to just making everyone more angry and anger is rarely productive. Seems like a simple gesture for an extremely complex issue and those that think the issue of social justice is not much more complicated in 2018 as opposed to 1968 are just not going to get very far with their opinions outside of the social media echo chamber, they are just not. Now this is my opinion. Yeah, about that... Protesters in Ferguson, for example, took a different approach. It didn't just make people angry, it brought out a highly-militarized police force. Marchers try to march peacefully, and are set upon by counter-protesters. Protesters have been viciously beaten - by members of both (every) faction. Sometimes the police intervene, sometimes not. I'm sure race never enters into that equation... The fact is, black folks live in a different world than white folks. Fact. White parents are not terrified their sons and daughters may not come home. White kids don't necessarily have 'The Talk' drilled into them. White folks do not suffer the daily casual indignities that black folks do. Oprah freakin' Winfrey was followed around a high-end store. The sales manager didn't see the most powerful woman in media, she saw a black woman: danger! Black folks have protested in every possible other way. Peacefully, violently, sit-ins, strikes, you name it. When the Black Panthers decided to patrol their streets with long guns, perfectly legal, the laws were changed to make it illegal to carry long guns in certain (predominantly black) neighborhoods. Today white folks bring assault rifles to demonstrations with no repercussions. Say what you will about the 2nd amendment, but apply it uniformly. A black man was shot and killed in his car, after he told the officer he had a gun and a license to carry it. He did what the rules say he should, and was murdered anyway. And white folks wonder why some black folks are terrified of police officers? Black folks have tried everything with little progress. In many ways conditions are getting worse for people of color. They have every right to protest by legal and peaceful means.
I disagreed with sitting on the bench: it's a sign of disrespect in any setting. But kneeling is silent, reflective, even reverential. Colin Kaepernick and Nate Boyer had a serious discussion about the issue, and kneeling was their compromise: respectful protest. And still people lost their minds. What do you suggest? Sing Kumbaya at halftime? What means of protest will satisfy you? What form of protest would get your attention, yet not offend you? I really would like to know, and I'm sure folks like Colin Kaepernick would like to know too.
The whole 'disrespecting the military' is a false narrative designed to denigrate the protest. Mr. Kaepernick and fellow protesters were specific about their reasons. The fact White America is making such a big deal about this is proof his actions are having some effect. The problem for White America though, it is shining an unwelcome light on the more sordid aspects of US history. History that draws a straight line to the present-day situation. White America does not want to face up to the truth of that history, and certainly doesn't want to face up to how it affects everyday life for black folks. Peace Y'all, c.
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Sep 5, 2018 - 12:29pm |
|
kcar wrote: Discussion of those issues is far more important than pointless debates about respecting the flag or national anthem. Why do you think I chose 1968? And I couldn't agree more with the highlighted point you made above, I even said this is one of the primary reasons of why I am against this method of protest. As far as the right to stand or sit, I still have yet to encounter anyone who has an opinion on the matter that disagrees with this point.
|
|
kcar
|
Posted:
Sep 5, 2018 - 12:20pm |
|
Public reaction to the issue of kneeling/linking arms during the national anthem is a lot more nuanced than you think, sirdroseph. I agree with you that kneeling has largely lost its effectiveness or run its course. It did a good job or raising public awareness about social injustice, police violence, etc. Interesting that you bring up 1968 in your post. Perhaps you remember US Olympians Tommie Smith and John Carlos raising their fists in a black power salute while on the medal stand during the 1968 summer Olympics. That was a big deal and engendered the same kinds of hostile response that kneeling did. My take is: welcome to democracy. People have a right to express their opinions. Athletes don't take an oath of respect to the flag, the national anthem or the regime currently in power. And the American flag is not some sacred symbol that must always, always be revered. The Republicans love to wrap themselves in the flag to deflect/disrupt discussion of issues that caused the symbolic protests in the first place. Discussion of those issues is far more important than pointless debates about respecting the flag or national anthem.
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Sep 5, 2018 - 12:00pm |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote: sirdroseph wrote: Does it? How much discussion is about what they are protesting as opposed to those upset about the anthem and I would submit that with the medias "help" is only to stoke the fires of anger and division because ratings are where the fire is. Sure, but you're advocating letting those people change the definition of the protest, and then wherever the dust settles, that's what the protest was about. Unless you're just one of those nuts who thinks any flag-related protest is abhorrent. I don't. If it's germane to the thing that flag represents, protest away. I guess my point is that I am not really advocating anything other than a better way to protest because in my opinion this one has run its course and is not working in addition to just making everyone more angry and anger is rarely productive. Seems like a simple gesture for an extremely complex issue and those that think the issue of social justice is not much more complicated in 2018 as opposed to 1968 are just not going to get very far with their opinions outside of the social media echo chamber, they are just not. Now this is my opinion.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming
Location: Powell Gender:
|
Posted:
Sep 5, 2018 - 11:48am |
|
sirdroseph wrote:
Does it? How much discussion is about what they are protesting as opposed to those upset about the anthem and I would submit that with the medias "help" is only to stoke the fires of anger and division because ratings are where the fire is.
Sure, but you're advocating letting those people change the definition of the protest, and then wherever the dust settles, that's what the protest was about. Unless you're just one of those nuts who thinks any flag-related protest is abhorrent. I don't. If it's germane to the thing that flag represents, protest away.
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Sep 5, 2018 - 11:44am |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote: sirdroseph wrote: Good for you, but not caring what someone cares about the protest is not exactly a way to achieve goals that require understanding from non bigots who would otherwise be sympathetic to the social struggles of the poor and minorities with the legal system and police. That's not what I said and you're demonstrating my point. "Why are they kneeling?" "To protest government violence against citizens, they're not taking part in the ceremony that celebrates the flag, which is a symbol of the nation doing that violence." "Well I don't like them. They wet their nests." It's a total non sequitur. Why give in to it? Why let fucking morons set the bar? It's as inoffensive as it can be, and if you refuse to let its meaning be changed by racists, it delivers its message well. Does it? How much discussion is about what they are protesting as opposed to those upset about the anthem and I would submit that with the medias "help" is only to stoke the fires of anger and division because ratings are where the fire is.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming
Location: Powell Gender:
|
Posted:
Sep 5, 2018 - 11:38am |
|
sirdroseph wrote:
Good for you, but not caring what someone cares about the protest is not exactly a way to achieve goals that require understanding from non bigots who would otherwise be sympathetic to the social struggles of the poor and minorities with the legal system and police.
That's not what I said and you're demonstrating my point. "Why are they kneeling?" "To protest government violence against citizens, they're not taking part in the ceremony that celebrates the flag, which is a symbol of the nation doing that violence." "Well I don't like them. They wet their nests." It's a total non sequitur. Why give in to it? Why let fucking morons set the bar? It's as inoffensive as it can be, and if you refuse to let its meaning be changed by racists, it delivers its message well.
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Sep 5, 2018 - 11:08am |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote: sirdroseph wrote: This is not a position, it is how people will perceive this act and that in it of itself makes it a fact. I understand what they are doing, but my opinion is irrelevant and not one of the people they are trying to reach. Perception is everything, the flag and the national anthem is a personal thing to each individual and what you and I think will not change that or their individualized reaction to it. You tell a Vet who raises and salutes that flag everyday that the act of kneeling or rejecting that flag and anthem is not rejecting what he feels about that flag and how he should separate them, some may understand, many more will not and I am not going to force this rejection down their throat and tell them how they should decipher the action. The fact that you interpreted what I said as a mandate is what those against this act or seeing the protest as, a mandate that they are only protesting their injustices and you are not allowed to see anything else and that the flag and the anthem can represent nothing else.
I care fuckall for people who apply their own definition to a protest. Kneeling for the Anthem? Clearly, that's a rejection of Bird Watchers and all the Gannets they've ever counted. Good for you, but not caring what someone cares about the protest is not exactly a way to achieve goals that require understanding from non bigots who would otherwise be sympathetic to the social struggles of the poor and minorities with the legal system and police. That is unless you really don't care whether anything actually gets done however for myself I would like to see us progress socially to live up to the words of the Bill of Rights and Constitution and treat everyone equally and these protest seem to be a distraction from that goal at best and it is time to move on to the next phase now that the red flag has been waved and national attention has been achieved.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming
Location: Powell Gender:
|
Posted:
Sep 5, 2018 - 11:02am |
|
sirdroseph wrote:
This is not a position, it is how people will perceive this act and that in it of itself makes it a fact. I understand what they are doing, but my opinion is irrelevant and not one of the people they are trying to reach. Perception is everything, the flag and the national anthem is a personal thing to each individual and what you and I think will not change that or their individualized reaction to it. You tell a Vet who raises and salutes that flag everyday that the act of kneeling or rejecting that flag and anthem is not rejecting what he feels about that flag and how he should separate them, some may understand, many more will not and I am not going to force this rejection down their throat and tell them how they should decipher the action. The fact that you interpreted what I said as a mandate is what those against this act or seeing the protest as, a mandate that they are only protesting their injustices and you are not allowed to see anything else and that the flag and the anthem can represent nothing else.
I care fuckall for people who apply their own definition to a protest. Kneeling for the Anthem? Clearly, that's a rejection of Bird Watchers and all the Gannets they've ever counted.
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Sep 5, 2018 - 10:40am |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote: sirdroseph wrote:The protesters intention is lost by rejecting the entire national anthem and all that it stands for, to reject that is to also reject those that fight for the flag, Bullshit. I am on deadline or I'd be more eloquent. But if you insist on taking this position, then so be it. Just understand that it's you, not me, who's mandating that it's a rejection of Apple Pie and Puppies. This is not a position, it is how people will perceive this act and that in it of itself makes it a fact. I understand what they are doing, but my opinion is irrelevant and not one of the people they are trying to reach. Perception is everything, the flag and the national anthem is a personal thing to each individual and what you and I think will not change that or their individualized reaction to it. You tell a Vet who raises and salutes that flag everyday that the act of kneeling or rejecting that flag and anthem is not rejecting what he feels about that flag and how he should separate them, some may understand, many more will not and I am not going to force this rejection down their throat and tell them how they should decipher the action. The fact that you interpreted what I said as a mandate is what those against this act are seeing the protest as, a mandate that they are only protesting their injustices and you are not allowed to see anything else and that the flag and the anthem can represent nothing else.
|
|
|